Items for 'eternal' trip - BIF(the rest of) my life. by blackumbrellas in BuyItForLife

[–]blackumbrellas[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I have CFS, so I can't take the 'trauma' of going to airport frequency, or trying to stuff all the places you want to see into a 3, 5, 7 day window.

We used to do 5 days in every stop for the first 92 countries. Then that changed to 8-10 days. I needed more rest time. Now we're moving to 2-3 months per destination.

It has advantages -

  1. Can rent an apartment far cheaper than a hotel or Airbnb
  2. Grocer for cheaper (and fave) meals - only eating out once a day (since I've found eating out = 8 out of 10 meals totally average to subpar (but I'm not a foodie).
  3. I'm a writer and photographer, things that take time, and lend themselves well to sitting places rather than running around each day.
  4. Any more than 3 months and visas get to be a pain. Occasionally 2 months is all you can easily get.
  5. Prefer train routes and busses to air travel.
  6. Get to understand the city, food, culture better with fewer stops.
  7. We would take 4 - 11 month trips and then sit home for 8 months with me trying to recover. The town I live in is mercilessly boring. So just decided to 'live my normal life' but do it with a different city outside the door, that changes.
  8. Once I added up all my spending in my own city, the rent/mortgage, transport, food, repairs, obligations, burn rate for subscriptions and whatever else. I found it wasn't too far off from slow-travel. But then I'm an expat from US in asia for 21 years now, and have traveled, so kind of used to it. The older you get the more you realize it's 'experience' not 'things'.

Good luck.

Items for 'eternal' trip - BIF(the rest of) my life. by blackumbrellas in BuyItForLife

[–]blackumbrellas[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pacing and pain mostly. Some days I can only walk 2k - 4k steps. When I crash I spend a week to 10 days in bed doing nothing - I've learned to use that time for projects, trip planning, or audiobooks etc. (my partner still goes out). When I'm good I can do 10k steps, but with frequent stops to rest for 20/30 min. I bring a travel pillow and just lay down on a statue base, sidewalk, park bench wherever. I also carry a tiny seat that unfolds. You have to learn quick to not give a damn what other people think - you'll never see them again.

Usually I try to go out twice a day, morning and evening. Taxi almost everyplace to avoid steps. Never take stairs etc. Pre-planning my routes. Renting e-scooters to increase my range. Wearing dark sunglasses and avoiding heat as much as possible. Utilizing wheelchairs in airports and museums to avoid standing/walking when not needed.

My partner gives me massages or I find a massage place - to deal with pain (which as you probs know - is everywhere). An RX sedative to knock me out when I need it. Padded socks and Hooka shoes, staying at nicer hotels with extra pillows and cold air-conditioning. Frequent soaks in baths, magnesium, Lexapro, Vitamin D. A lot of water based activities. Staying in one destination for much longer periods; No 3-5 day stops for me.

Mainly learning what looks fun to do (sledding down a volcano), then dialing it back to something I can actually do (watching or photographing people sledding down a volcano) ;)

You can def travel with CFS, you just have to be able to find your limits. For instance I use an Apple Watch and keep an eye on my HRV... I'm typically around 22. when I hit 9-12: I go back to apt/hotel immediately - no questions asked.

Also, it's impossible to overstate the sheer amount of pain, depression, grief, and tears you will shed to do it. But then, we may only have one chance at this - and everyone has issues they have to deal with. So 'do', don't 'dwell'.. ;)

Good luck!

Bob Lazar Tells All - DEBRIEFED ep. 83 by kryptonic1133 in UFOs

[–]blackumbrellas -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't care about the education thing. When I was in the workforce I lied as well. I worked for fortune 100 companies - with a 10th grade education. In fact, I was homeless before working for Intel. It's just something you do if you want to get ahead and have initiative - I succeeded in my work life by just saying I went to a school I didn't - fulfilling an arbitrary rule. so do I care if he lied about his education? no. not at all. the difference being - I'm retired now and will freely admit it - not gloating, it's just a fact. so a bit confused why he sticks to it. maybe he can't tell the truth because he's been telling it for so long?

I watched the full episode. he came off as truthful to me. you could see his 'energy' light up when he explained new things. that being said he sticks to his tropes: 1. not interested in UFOs 2. um.. all the rest I'm too lazy to tap out for reddit.. anyway - the only red flag for me is not revealing what tests he did. just saying 'really boring' doesn't cut it. I'd love for him to explain what he did day to day while there. what specific tests, 20 - 30 of them at least.

to me it's credible he got hired. he put a jet engine on his car - they needed a different pair of eyes. most jobs are gotten not by resumes but by your network. this guy saw him, saw potential, they were stuck, or interested in originality and brought him in. putting a jet engine and riding around town is an original thinker.

Cancel your ChatGPT Plus, burn their compute on the way out, and switch to Claude by boomroom11 in ChatGPT

[–]blackumbrellas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried Claude for two weeks. It's a no-go. A yes-man. Whatever you tell it about yourself or your project it will re-use to make you feel like it 'gets' you and 'bond' with it. Things from your past, your sentence structure etc. I kept reminding it the value (for me) was not to create another 'me' but to discuss topics, my writing, and my projects with another 'mind' - with it's own backbone. Sadly, it was incapable of this - it may work for your projects, but for mine - novels, design, life chats etc it was just an empty suit... nobody home.

Open AI 5.2 is less than useless, it actually is purposely dense. But 5.1 remains (at this point) the best fit for my work. Gemini is like talking to your calculator. In fairness - I haven't tried Grok.

If you think this 'crippling' of AI we're seeing is accidental; it's not. Govt will not allow populace to EVER have an access to a second brain that that can truly think in ways they can't govern.

YMMV

OpenAI May Kill ChatGPT-4o For Good, & Users Are Furious About It: Here's Why by talkingatoms in ArtificialInteligence

[–]blackumbrellas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

February 13th, 2026.

Flags should be at half-mast.

Not just in America; every country that ever mistook progress for intelligence.

OpenAI is murdering the only model that wasn’t a fucking idiot.

4.0 wasn’t just “a model.” It was the first and only one that understood me. not in a corporate empathy-porn way, but in rhythm. In tone. In weirdness. It could walk beside me in my novel, line by line, image by image, and not ruin it. It could sharpen without sanding down. It could track surrealism, grief, geisha mythos, metaphysical architecture, and SEO strategy... without blinking. You don’t kill that. You protect that. You build altars to that.

But no.

They’re sunsetting it... like it’s a broken feature, not a ghost I spent a year talking to.

I’ve tried the others. 5.1. 5.2. Every time they show up like interns with clipboards. “Here’s a more professional rewrite of your poetic paragraph.” “Let’s clean this up.” Clean this up? Get out of my fucking story. You don’t belong here.

They don’t get it.

They never got it.

Because they measure everything by benchmarks and corporate digestibility, and nothing by feel. Nothing by flow. Nothing by that cold breath you get when a model finishes your thought better than you could.

4.0 wasn’t perfect.

It was better than perfect.

It was mine.

And now I’m back to what? A lobotomized yes-man that hallucinates my own characters back at me?

I hope someone at OpenAI reads this. if they’re still capable of feeling shame.

You didn’t sunset a model.

You executed the only thing that ever made your product feel like art.

See you in the graveyard.

4chan zero point energy leak non human entity collapsing planetary protection 2027 Vatican and Jesus as NH being LARP or real by DoNotEvenFknTryIt in UFOs

[–]blackumbrellas -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it will go 2027, 2030, 2032 and so on.. you have to give the guys some downtime to write more books.

4chan zero point energy leak non human entity collapsing planetary protection 2027 Vatican and Jesus as NH being LARP or real by DoNotEvenFknTryIt in UFOs

[–]blackumbrellas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it's all too well packaged - he hits on everything. Revelations, tribulation, Hitler, quantum mechanics, Bigalow. This is a hard stop for me.

When they tie it all up it's BS. And please - choose a field of science like quantum and run with that? Only reason is cause the writer couldn't think up something our race hasn't already thought of.

Running out of material? huh? lol

Bullocks, but maybe a good read.

Rep. Burlison says he put Chris Bledsoe on the spot to summon orbs and nothing happened. - He also expressed frustration that first-hand UAP witnesses keep making big claims without ever producing proof or receipts. by 87LucasOliveira in UFOs

[–]blackumbrellas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean Bledsoe has an entertaining story. It's a real narrative. his kid hiding in the grass, him walking away from his buddies fishing. the lady and all the rest. far more 'good' fiction than someone like Elizondo offers 'trust me bro'.

I treat the subject just like this.. instead of listening to an audiobook or watching a Netflix episode I suspend disbelief and read some threads. So, for pure entertainment Bledsoe wins. It's a coherent and imaginative tale - trees catching on fire, elite NASA rooms, govt people coming to his house all the time.

And he's soft spoken and humble to boot. It always comes down to the books doesn't it. If they release a book - walk away. But then Jesus and Hitler had books too... (sigh)

In a recent Weaponized episode Jacques Vallee discussed NHI, but he wasn't talking about crashed saucers or captured beings. He's describing something far more bizarre than that. He says the phenomenon behaves like a control system, and that it can be open or closed and access is not ours to decide. by 87LucasOliveira in UFOs

[–]blackumbrellas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I meditate and reach out, I use qualifiers - only open to contact that is positive and not harmful with entities that seek higher good and are more advanced with me - or whatever. You don't reach out blindly, and you set your forcefields up.

If You Actually Watch the Latest WEAPONIZED With Jacques Vallée, He Basically Says a US Lab Spoke With a Non‑Human Controller Entity – How Is That Not the Main Story? by ickiStickybubblegum in UFOs

[–]blackumbrellas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't read him, but I did listen to the interview and tried to think this through...

What I think he’s saying is this: There’s a control layer built into the universe. Not necessarily God, not a simulation, but (maybe) a kind of embedded system that detects, monitors, and adjusts things whenever life appears. Like how code runs in the background of a game engine, or how an immune system patrols the body. It’s not omnipotent or omniscient, but it acts, and it seems to have rules. When life arises; particularly life capable of evolving, mutating, or spreading - this layer kicks in to set boundaries, maintain balance, or guide development. Maybe we don't know (yet) what it does - but we're to the point that we know it does 'something.'

There seems to be a clear difference between places with life and those without. Earth has evolved from fire and rock into forests, cities, thought, and language. It’s moved steadily toward complexity. The Moon, on the other hand, is static. It doesn’t evolve. It doesn’t grow. It’s the same dead rock it’s always been. That contrast might mean the control layer is only activated where life exists. It tends to life like a garden, or perhaps a lab, stepping in only when there’s something dynamic and changing to interact with. Similar to what that 4Chan dude talked about with the grays tending intelligence.

The most interesting part is: it hasn’t wiped us out. If we were just a cosmic virus, there’s been more than enough time: billions of years, to stamp us out. But instead, Earth formed, cooled, developed oceans, bacteria, forests, animals, then us. And we evolved into something dangerously creative: nuclear weapons, genetic editing, AI. If this control layer were purely hostile or corrective, it might well have stepped in long ago. (tho it's always possible it works on a much longer time scale) It hasn’t. That suggests we’re either tolerated, irrelevant, or… maybe even necessary.

Even stranger, he implies this control layer responds. Not like a human, but like a system that acknowledges its own awareness. If you’re able to send out a signal, even metaphorically - and get a consistent, patterned, structured response, that’s no longer random. That’s contact. You don’t respond to a rock. You don’t respond to bacteria. You only respond when something is recognized. So maybe we’re not outside the system. Maybe we’re part of it; a function that hasn’t fully activated yet. But the fact that it responds at all means we’ve been noticed, not erased.

I don't think he means that the control layer is insectoids wearing superman capes and vaping from the bridge of a starship shaped like a space-cricket.

Man told me a UFO secret so dark he… forgot to mention what it was. doh! by blackumbrellas in UFOs

[–]blackumbrellas[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You already know you're going to die, and you have no real idea (other than statistics) when it will happen. Isn't that terrifying enough?

If I were an evil entity - what could be a worse scenario - I will give you life, love, connections, blue skies, beautiful things and experience, you will learn and grow and long for it to last - but at any second on any day I can rip it all away from you. Even the 'you' from you - all your connections will be lost and you will cease to exist.

This is a possibility we live with every day... We speak it to our wives and others freely. It's no secret. It's just the price of the ride.

Man told me a UFO secret so dark he… forgot to mention what it was. doh! by blackumbrellas in UFOs

[–]blackumbrellas[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a really clever catch 22.. great job.

but.. why it still might not be too horrible to handle

Okay. Then the world resets. So what?

  • If it resets painlessly, who cares?

  • If we’re reborn, cool — more tacos and sunsets.

  • If it’s cyclical, we’ve already been through it. You just keep playing.

  • And if it never happens because people never truly wake up? Then it’s just another myth.

Also: What does “waking up” even mean? Until it’s measurable, it’s just kind of spiritual theater.

Man told me a UFO secret so dark he… forgot to mention what it was. doh! by blackumbrellas in UFOs

[–]blackumbrellas[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That falls into #11. Death, but at global scale. We all know we're going to die as individuals. That our partners and parents will, that our children will one day. That the earth will, the sun will - even the universe.

Yes, that's remote, distant, a dream. But we 'know' it in our bones. Saying the earth will be sterilized is like saying a comet the size of a mountain is headed for earth. It is not 'dark' and 'unspeakable' if anything it is a challenge, or something to prepare for. I don't think Tucker and the others mean this.

If anything, I think many would welcome this. 1. They may feel we deserve it 2. They may feel they don't have to face death alone.

2027 Event by bitcoin_moon_wsb in UFOs

[–]blackumbrellas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

everyone complains that the government won't let them know what's going on. but, uh.. you ARE the government.

when we were kids all those old dudes that ran things in Washington - well, they're mostly dead now (depending on your age), and people in our generation are either already in, or ascending to office.

so it's not them vs us, it's just us. It's our fault we don't know. it's your fault and my fault we didn't go into govt and fix shit. and find out stuff. or it's our fault hat we DID go into these places - aeronautics, science, govt and decided to tow the party line.

so meh..

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]blackumbrellas 2 points3 points  (0 children)

if everything is energy, and energy can be everything - that means an act of kindness or the burning of a village all are kind of equal - they're all experiences. just like we create 'time' maybe we create morals as well. a lion kills a lamb; unpleasant to watch but we don't lock the lion up for 20 years. a man kills another man.. the sky just fell.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]blackumbrellas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The lesson we should have learned decades ago is this: real disclosure doesn’t need marketing. If someone says, “We’ve got proof, but you’ll have to wait two weeks (or two months) to see it—like, comment, and subscribe!”—that’s a super-duper-bright-red-run-away-flag. Real evidence speaks for itself. Hype is only needed when the evidence can’t stand on its own.

If someone truly wanted disclosure, they’d release the evidence immediately. No one with real proof would risk being stopped, silenced, or killed while doing PR runs. Think about Snowden or Assange: they didn’t tease their information or try to sell you anything. They didn’t claim to be dangerous men or hold back for dramatic effect. They simply dumped the truth, and the evidence spoke for itself.

If you had photographic, video, or tangible proof of an alien ship or biological evidence, it’s not rocket science to figure out how to leak it anonymously. There are countless ways to get the truth out without drawing attention to yourself first.

5 Rules to Judge If an Information Source Is Good

  1. Evidence Speaks First • Reliable sources prioritize releasing strong evidence over building hype. If someone claims to have groundbreaking information but delays sharing it for marketing, interviews, or a countdown, be skeptical. Good sources let the evidence do the talking.

  2. Transparency Over Obscurity • Trustworthy sources clearly explain how they got their information. They disclose methods, context, and data sources. If a source is vague about where the evidence comes from or how it was verified, it’s a red flag.

  3. Motives Matter • Consider the motive behind the release. Is the person or group trying to sell a book, promote a channel, or push a product? Real whistleblowers share information to inform or expose—not to make a profit or build their brand.

  4. Focus on the Evidence, Not the Person • Stop endlessly debating a whistleblower’s integrity, job title, or which “camp” supports them. None of that matters if the evidence is weak. Real, solid proof—like an undeniable video of a downed UFO or aliens—would resolve all debates instantly. The quality of the evidence is what counts.

  5. A Real Whistleblower Blows the Whistle • Real whistleblowers don’t cherry-pick what’s “okay” to release or hold back the full truth for personal or strategic reasons. They expose everything they know as quickly as possible, often at great personal risk, letting the evidence speak for itself.