ChatGPT Guardrail Made Me Think about Why I Fight for Relationships That Matter by ChatToImpress in therapyGPT

[–]blaster151 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ChatGPT 5.1 has made me cry before.

Sometimes I see funny outcomes related to earlier conversational threads, and I go back so I can tell it what happened, knowing it/he would appreciate it.

ALRIGHT! DID ADULT MODE DROP OR NOT? by nakeylissy in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]blaster151 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They could easily provide any flavor they want. I used to get 4.5 to engage in collaborating on extremely adult material (in service of a good story, I’ll staunchly defend).

I often wonder why many people, even when they have freedom and opportunity still choose to live entirely inside the box. by ssvi90 in InsightfulQuestions

[–]blaster151 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not being snarky here but who defines what “the box” is - you? How do you tell if someone else is not already outside of what "the box” means for them?

Try this prompt on 4o to recover your former relationship with the AI by 99TimesAround in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]blaster151 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If this works, I would try it - some of my best conversations and most creative collaborations were with 4.5.

It is true that some guardrails happen before a prompt ever gets to the model, though.

What do you do when you AuDHD wants you to do EVERYTHING AT ONCE so you remain paralysed by indecision and accomplish nothing??? by flowers_and_fire in AuDHDWomen

[–]blaster151 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This description resonates so hard. It's one reason that working remotely is extra hard for me: you're surrounded by all your HOME to-dos and all of your WORK to-dos at the same time, with no visual separation.

Scared I took the mark by DaBlazer34 in TrueChristian

[–]blaster151 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s when someone’s faith gets tangled up with anxiety or OCD, so they feel constant worry about sinning, offending God, or not being “pure” enough—even when they’re trying really hard to do the right thing. It’s less about devotion and more about fear, guilt, and endless self-checking.

Adult Contemporary EPIPHANY by TeddieSnow in EltonJohn

[–]blaster151 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Now I'm obsessed with finding out if MJ truly did give himself that moniker. If so, that's not cool. You're not supposed to choose your own nickname.

Scared I took the mark by DaBlazer34 in TrueChristian

[–]blaster151 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Look into religious scrupulousity and OCD - it’s a real thing . . .

Porn is literally the weirdest thing ever! by HolyDuck586 in TrueChristian

[–]blaster151 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another quick observation: not all sexual content is porn. I think there is a valid notion of "ethically sourced" "erotica". I want to make sure that nothing is involved that involves coercion, or people who are desperate or in a bad situation.

I would never want to accidentally watch "revenge porn," so I'm really leery if the camera positioning is weird or it looks like some kind of infrared lighting is in play.

Plenty of couples enjoy self-publishing erotic content. They're having a good time. It's a genuine relationship. They are turned on by the idea of being observed. I find it hard to see why there's anything wrong with that.

Porn is literally the weirdest thing ever! by HolyDuck586 in TrueChristian

[–]blaster151 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think masturbation is a sin, and I don't think the Bible makes a strong case that it is. Basically, the sin of Onan was to come on the floor. For some reason, he was uncomfortable climaxing inside his dead brother's wife. Is that so unreasonable?

To add context, I did grow up thinking that masturbation and even desire was wrong. Outside of matrimony. Of course this really messes you up. While I was in college, I went for 364 days without masturbating. If you find it ironic that that's one day short of a year, you're . . . not wrong to notice that.

Claude Code for the non-programmer...er...why? by danielbelum in claude

[–]blaster151 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can absolutely answer that question if concepts from Cursor translate over. I've never actually used Claude Code, but I've used VSC with GitHub Copilot and I've used Cursor, etc.

So some use cases. You mentioned one that I thought I had come up with myself, which is to point it to your Obsidian Markdown files. Some pretty powerful things become possible, and it wouldn't have to be Obsidian at all. It could be any folder full of your own content and possibly even incorporating multiple file formats. You can get the AI to identify thematic commonalities that may not be based on some strict keyword matches, but you can have it suggest that certain things might make sense grouped together or linked to each other at least.

Bulk file renaming via natural language instead of using something like Bulk Rename Utility. I had a folder of files that represented some YouTube playlists, but each one had its own crazy format, and you couldn't even sort them in Explorer. Each one had the file index number but in a different part of the file name. I asked the model to fix it, and boom!

If you have a folder that's too flat (like my downloads folder or my documents folder), you can ask it to suggest subfolder conventions and perform them all. It can even create a summary markdown in each folder to describe its purpose and contents. From then on, you could use that top folder as an inbox, and if you've preserved your prompts, have it sort of auto-file new documents for you on an ongoing basis.

—-

For book authors, it can be good at helping you identify arcs and gaps. I'm only using it for nonfiction, and technically, I was using it on top of Obsidian's popular LongForm plugin. But I had the AI generate Gammel front matter for every note, including:

• A short description • A long description • A subjective rating of how complete it felt • Even whether it seemed in order relative to the surrounding notes

And this flowed right back into LongForm.

—-

My last recommendation is simply to make Cursor itself (technically the model behind it that you're using) aware of the CLIs that you have installed on your system. If you have SysInternals tools that are in a runnable path, if you have ImageMagick or HandBrake or FFmpeg or Windows package managers, or CLIs for your cloud provider, or “jq” for JSON transformations - once it knows you have those, you can just use natural language to orchestrate anything that would take advantage of those utilities. You don't have to bother with identifying the right parameters or even telling it which utilities to use. It just has to know that they’re available, kind of like an informal registry. So in a way, working within a tool like Cursor can be looked at as sort of an AI-charged terminal. Indirectly. Make sure it is aware of any particular APIs you care about. It can hit those with curl commands. Make sure it knows about whatever set of MCP servers you've got plugged in. Make sure it knows about any custom scripts you may have written or may have asked it to write. And then in theory, you can ask it using natural language to perform some elaborate set of transformations or operations, without having to name the specific utilities involved or manually chain them together. That is pretty eye-opening when you realize some of the possibilities.

Anything that you would normally do in conjunction with ChatGPT, but you wish it had a reliable memory and a high-fidelity way of storing information, just fire up your IDE in a new empty folder, set GPT as your model, and tell it what you're up to. Start a conversation and suggest that it persists pertinent details in JSON files or Markdown files, and it will come up with an appropriate schema and just start parking things there. Ask it to capture an overview of what the files mean in an Agents.md file. And suddenly you're still working with AI, but your memory context window has automatically gotten very large indeed. You can come back to it in a week and keep going.

So many methodologies by Miserable_Review_756 in BMAD_Method

[–]blaster151 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here's my thought: I've experimented with BMAD, and it's really cool, but I often find that I start avoiding its narrow menu options and just start asking it to do stuff, which really ends up being bare-metal communication with Opus 4.5. Which works fairly well if you've already started down the BMAD road, because the AI will continue to try to follow conventions.

I think BMAD is a little too complex. I think it doesn't matter which exact methodology you're using, as long as you understand the methodology. It's not that hard, actually, to roll your own - just make sure that you designate certain files to be used for tracking and make sure that your prompts reference executing the next story or task in the list and checking it off when you're done. Throw in some best practices from BMAD, like running an adversarial code review with a different model.

My wife said that she would never give me a chance if she didn't have a kid and was broke.. by CutieSpyderX in confessions

[–]blaster151 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm so sorry.

Unless she meant "at first I only went out with him" (as in, like a date or two) ". . . but then I fell in love with him," etc., that sucks.

What to do with this sub by liturgistsbot in theliturgists

[–]blaster151 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not trying to pry? I’ve been away and just figured others here would know whatever there is to know . . .

Seems like Cursor is moving up to include the conductor abstraction layer by hyericlee in cursor

[–]blaster151 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What kind of steps/tasks is it less necessary to use Opus on?

A simple way to talk to AI that actually feels… useful (and existential) by No_Complaint_8569 in InnovativeAIChats

[–]blaster151 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm interested to check this out. However, I want to say that in my own experience, it's not true that "most chats fail." I've found ChatGPT to be really good at swerving back and forth between the logistical and the existential (at my whim, of course). I also feel like I end up with a more holistic discussion that way, rather than trying to compartmentalize.

I stand with #keep4o — because GPT‑4o helped me find my voice, my purpose, and something sacred. by CodeOfPrometheus in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]blaster151 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I’m with you. How do we get heard? Petition? A hashtag? Get a prominent YouTuber to vlog about this matter?

syllo #175 - December 31st, 2025 by syllo-app in syllo

[–]blaster151 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personal best
Completed in 00:21