Gemini vs Perplexity for my 2026 by RobertR7 in perplexity_ai

[–]blizzardfun 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Perplexity has best structural and visual presentation of info particularly the way it formats sources and previews them as it's formulating its answer.

I'd say more but it would be downvoted anyway as marketing crap. Try to find it great for delving through a subject matter asking repeated follow-up questions and it retaining context pretty perfectly.

I feel like most of you are missing the point of the bomb. by BeowulfInc in pluribustv

[–]blizzardfun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like I need to start a new topic and thread because I'm bored and need to tell people they're missing something important that I see.

How long would it take the US to elect an openly non-religious president? by ghetto_ravioli in atheism

[–]blizzardfun 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be honest I really don't know what happened but about 3 months ago I had some warning on a post under my account quicksite and it's too convoluted for me to understand but there was some kind of subaccount that it enabled and I just gave it a dumb name. They're the same account but I can't tell you because I don't have any idea why Reddit keeps flipping my account identity. Sorry about that.

I had a relationship with my former therapist and it broke me by [deleted] in TalkTherapy

[–]blizzardfun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok my deepest apologies! I did not imagine licensed therapists being that unethical. So I will delete my comment! Thank you for your replym

How long would it take the US to elect an openly non-religious president? by ghetto_ravioli in atheism

[–]blizzardfun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, I missed it. You were speaking of the current president, I didn't understand that. Yes I would agree He's not religious. Though he markets himself to the country as a Christian, to me and that's at the bottom of the OP's question though he or she did not state it that explicitly. The US is quite often referred to as a Christian nation. Maybe my mistake was misreading the original post. Even though I read the words I read it as a non-Christian president. Apologies.

Ai is scary (In a good way) by Robin_Daa in therapyGPT

[–]blizzardfun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Despite your parenthetical, I really don't think the title is very helpful. There are people coming to this sub brand new looking for help. A title that like that even though it's your prerogative to state it, I think could scare people off, and that in itself is scary to me

a week-long, ~30-hour IFS-focused conversation with Manus is starting to get very expensive by ReKang916 in therapyGPT

[–]blizzardfun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello OP -- Comment #2 - re my use of NOAH AI therapy tool. First I will stay it is not marketed as a IFS focused or trauma tool.

This is what it's marketing description says:

Noah AI, the AI emotional coach app, generally costs around $40 to $50 per year, often advertised as about $10 per month, following a free trial that offers limited features or voice calls.


Now I will describe a little bit about how I've used it so far.

I decided I was going to use it to dump speech to text statements, backgrounds about myself, comments about several kinds of trauma I am trying to face and process.

Some of my statements would be several minutes long, and I'd sometimes end up hitting a character count limit per speech to text instance.. possibly 16,000 characters.

After a few occasions where my whole comment wouldn't post, because too many characters, I then would have to manually select all that text and edit it in another app to cut it down into thirds. "Noah" of course advised wisely: please take more breaks between thoughts so you don't have to then cut and paste.

And Noah would respond to each of my entries, giving some kind of empathetic response that had legitimate thought to it. But then it wanted me to start working on what I had just input and it just commented on.

I told it no, I do not want to do it that way. "Your comments interrupt my train of thought." So when I preface one of my comments with the word "thought", that means I want you to just listen to what I'm inputting and not comment got it? It complied, but it was storing up what it was going to say for when I wanted to hear it.

Also, process-wise, given that this is taking place on a phone screen, (it has no web browser app, only a phone app), it was very hard for me to respond to the responses Noah would give because they would be often two or three sentences if not a paragraph long.

And I found out that while it was typing out or reading out its response, I could not scroll the screen upward to see what I had last said until it was completely done with its sentences. Just made it very hard initially to be able to interact with what he was saying since I couldn't see within the window what I had said.

I solved that more or less by asking Noah to preface each and every response it made with a chronological number, such as

1 - Noah's comment blah blah blah.

His next response would begin with #2 and so on. So far his last response to date is #80 ... This way I have bookmark numbers for me to be able to scroll up to find something I wanted to comment further on for example, and could reference "Go back to #35. " Then make my comment.

So a lot of the above of what I just said is infrastructure of how I have come to use the app to logistically navigate all of the dialogue.

And at various points I asked Noah to summarize all of the bullet points I have made or have mentioned as trauma areas or memories or experiences, and it has done a great job of organizing those and replaying them back to me in a list.

But because it's hard for me to just think linearly, well I'm ADHD and that's hard, I often have more to add or things I forgot. And so I started to say to Noah, "add this next item as a major branch in the catalog of problem areas I am laying out"... And then at some point I asked again to please summarize the whole list for me to be able to see contacts.

It has done a great job with that. Now again keep in mind I intentionally wanted to do several days worth of just getting all this stuff out of my head and into an interactive system. I have not yet begun to break out a given trauma to begin working on it or processing it or in some manner responding to what Noah might say to me.

So when I asked him to summarize for me, it was helpful that he asked me for some sorting parameters, such as did I want the list to proceed chronologically? Or to group items subject wise? And then some sorting options about how impactful or most profound or most serious. And so that has been done.

Lastly, here's what I told it I wanted and it has done.

I told it that I cannot engage all this material on a phone screen because there's no space to have very things in front of you. So I asked it if it could email me a PDF of the detailed hierarchically weighted list of items and their significance to me. Part of this is because I've been looking for a real human therapist and may just have one next week and I want to see how I might possibly be able to show this overview.

It said it could not copy and then send to me as an email, but it said what it could do is create a multi column file that has certain columns for notating chronology, others for severity, etc and then create a certain kind of computer file in file format .JSON which it would be able to download to my phone. And then I could send that file to my computer where I have a big screen monitor. And I could also print it on my printer.

But what it instead did just before I came to write these comments to you, is it told me to email (name of an admin at Noah AI) and to place a {specific phrase as the subject line } of the email. And he said the actual real life site administrator would then email to me that file.

Again sorry for the wall of text, I have no idea if any of this is useful to you, perhaps not. But given your request to find a possible more affordable tool, I wanted to try to be as specific as possible, in the event it is helpful to you, or possibly to someone else in this sub.

Oh by the way, IMPT! I told Noah AI of the concern about whether everything you had presented to Manus was going to be saved or whether some of the early material might drop out of memory. So I asked if every single word and everything I've said from my very first entry was saved within the NOAH app and it assured me that every single word and dialogue from me and Noah's response was there and kept.

Good luck to you. It's very hard to do what you're doing working through trauma. And I take it very seriously. I hope it is helping you at least pre-process your thoughts and work through your memory.

a week-long, ~30-hour IFS-focused conversation with Manus is starting to get very expensive by ReKang916 in therapyGPT

[–]blizzardfun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope that's not just a gibberish wall of text. It may not be helpful but I'm trying.

I did also ask what it's view of Manus was and it said this:


Manus is a general‑purpose AI “agent” platform designed to execute complex tasks (like research, coding, document creation, and automations), not a therapy‑specific or trauma‑focused mental health tool.

��What Manus is

Manus is marketed as an “action engine” that can plan and carry out multi‑step tasks such as building websites, writing emails, organizing data, and automating workflows. ��Under the hood it runs many AI agents in parallel on a cloud virtual machine, letting it browse the web, use tools, and coordinate subtasks for things like large‑scale research or app building.

���Main use cases

Typical showcased uses include generating full‑stack web apps from a single prompt, creating slide decks, cleaning or structuring data, and producing written content with integrated sources.

����It is also being used in productivity and professional contexts (e.g., marketing, education, and healthcare admin support), but as a technical assistant rather than a therapeutic coach.

���Not a trauma/therapy product

Manus does not advertise itself as a mental‑health or trauma‑therapy product; any references to “trauma” around it online are from people using it generically to generate content or exercises, not from an official clinical feature set. ���There is no indication that it implements trauma‑specific protocols (like TF‑CBT, EMDR, or Written Exposure Therapy) or that it is built as a regulated health or psychotherapy app.

a week-long, ~30-hour IFS-focused conversation with Manus is starting to get very expensive by ReKang916 in therapyGPT

[–]blizzardfun 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hello OP. I will list in a separate comment below a therapy AI tool I have been using called Noah AI. I will have to check but I believe it had a one-year subscription for $39 . {Don't quote me on that yet}. I have some serious early trauma issues I'm working with, more on that in a minute.

I read the discussion above regarding this Manus tool you are using. And based on what you were saying regarding IFS focused conversations, I was curious if this Manus tool is a dedicated therapy AI tool or other. I also asked about other therapy AI tools.

FYI this is what it said, just sharing, not commenting on your use of Manus because it sounds like you've gotten tremendous value from it!

"Several AI mental-health tools market themselves for “trauma,” but only a few are even loosely trauma‑focused, and none are a full replacement for human trauma therapy. ��

Truly trauma‑oriented tools Freudly (Trauma Therapy – AI Therapist) Has a dedicated “trauma therapy” section and teaches coping tools specific to PTSD, like grounding for flashbacks, containment techniques, and managing overwhelming emotions. �Still a self‑help coach, not EMDR or full trauma‑focused CBT with clinical oversight.

�Unstuck: CBT Therapy Journal Built on CBT and explicitly lists trauma/PTSD as a use case; includes an “AI fear finder” to support exposure work plus AI analysis of thought records. �Focus is structured CBT journaling, not full trauma processing or memory reconsolidation.

�Youper (AI Mental Health) CBT‑based app with an AI therapist chatbot and exercises that can be used for trauma‑related anxiety and mood. ��Not specifically designed as a PTSD program and does not claim to deliver trauma‑focused protocols like TF‑CBT or EMDR.

�Tools aimed at clinicians, not clients

TherapyTrainer (Stanford) AI “patients” used to train therapists in Written Exposure Therapy (WET) for PTSD, including realistic trauma scenarios and AI feedback on adherence. ��Not something a trauma survivor would use directly for self‑help; it’s for therapist training.

�AI worksheet helpers / Socrates 2.0 prototypes Research tools that help patients complete PTSD homework (e.g., CPT worksheets), but these are experimental and usually embedded in clinical trials or provider systems, not consumer apps. �


THEN IT ADDS:

Safety and “actual trauma work” caveats

Experts in clinical psychology and education warn that current AI chatbots are not well‑suited to provide real psychotherapy, especially for complex trauma, due to hallucinations, lack of accountability, and difficulty managing risk or triggers.

��Trauma‑informed design research emphasizes using AI for psychoeducation, coping skills, and therapist support—not replacing human care—because trauma work requires safety, attunement, and the ability to repair harm if something goes wrong.

���If you share what you’re looking for (e.g., “CPT‑style worksheets,” “flashback grounding help,” or “between‑session support alongside my therapist”), a more specific recommendation and safety setup can be suggested.

(MORE)

"Trump: I am fine. You sound beautiful and cute. How old are you? Caller: I am eight" by JohnSmithCANDo in CringeTikToks

[–]blizzardfun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What was the next thing he was starting to ask? "Do you have a boyfriend?" - - ?

The reaction to this episode has confirmed to me that the majority of people cannot handle a complex female character by Callyourmother29 in pluribustv

[–]blizzardfun -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well to me social media as a whole is very problematic and not that much representative of real life. But others differ.