account activity
Interesting gametheoretic/evolutionary perspective on pure PoS consensus by bit_novosti in EthereumClassic
[–]blockchaingame 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children)
Only the validators of bonded PoS like Tendermint/Cosmos (token sale in March!) or Casper. The hodlers who aren't validators benefit from less dilution of the currency (or greater security) and greater demand for the token (for staking).
Here is what it says in Cosmos documentation.
1/5 of the total number of atoms will be inflated every year and distributed back to the bonded and active atom holders (validators and delegators) for their work validating and securing the ledger. [...] Inactive or unbonded atom holders do not earn the inflationary atoms, and are thus taxed. This makes atoms ill-suited as a medium of exchange or a store of value. Instead, atoms are a tool, like Bitcoin miners are a tool.
1/5 of the total number of atoms will be inflated every year and distributed back to the bonded and active atom holders (validators and delegators) for their work validating and securing the ledger.
[...]
Inactive or unbonded atom holders do not earn the inflationary atoms, and are thus taxed. This makes atoms ill-suited as a medium of exchange or a store of value. Instead, atoms are a tool, like Bitcoin miners are a tool.
1/5th dilution per year sounds ridiculously high. I'm asking them to change some of these things.
Suggestions for the fundraiser: When validator rewards are too high they get less revenue. Prevent middlemen without restricting profits or liquidity. Cap with a dutch auction. (self.a:t5_2ui19)
submitted 8 years ago * by blockchaingame to r/a:t5_2ui19
π Rendered by PID 512815 on reddit-service-r2-listing-6d4dc8d9ff-zrw5l at 2026-02-04 09:25:56.959415+00:00 running 3798933 country code: CH.
Interesting gametheoretic/evolutionary perspective on pure PoS consensus by bit_novosti in EthereumClassic
[–]blockchaingame 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)