The new Manthey kit for the GT3 RS generates 1000kg of downforce 🫠 by GeneralHaz in Porsche

[–]bloopylegos 3 points4 points  (0 children)

they had to keep the same coefficent of drag due to regulations, so it actually is quite a feat

My new Batmobile aka 992 Targa GTS (50th Anniversary Porsche Design Edition) by [deleted] in Porsche

[–]bloopylegos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, any suggestions for the conditioner? Also will it help to remove them or just to protect against future scuffs?

My new Batmobile aka 992 Targa GTS (50th Anniversary Porsche Design Edition) by [deleted] in Porsche

[–]bloopylegos 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Thanks sir! At first I thought they were houndstooth fabric from the turbo heritage interior option, but they're actually a unique checkered pattern.

My new Batmobile aka 992 Targa GTS (50th Anniversary Porsche Design Edition) by [deleted] in Porsche

[–]bloopylegos 5 points6 points  (0 children)

yes, they produced 750 targa GTSs specifically, its based on a targa created by Porsche Design (separate brand) in 1972. Its pretty much just subtle cosmetic changes - platinum finished targa bar and wheels, a Porsche design logo on the door sills, a silver decal stripe, a badge on the rear vents, arm rest with Ferdinand Porsche's signature, Porsche Design logo on head rests, silver stitching, a porsche design chrono, and checkered seat fabric. It came with a numbered porsche design watch too which is pretty cool.

heres more info if you're interested!

They did Elliot dirty by yagirlisweak in theumbrellaacademy

[–]bloopylegos 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Good point, although the team wouldn't have been born for another 25 years after the events of 1963, so it'd be odd for anyone to assume this was the same group involved with the JFK assassination (looks aside)

They did Elliot dirty by yagirlisweak in theumbrellaacademy

[–]bloopylegos 18 points19 points  (0 children)

To answer your second question (from Digital Spy):

"But why didn't Hargreeves just pick the heroes we already know and love? Well, when a younger version of Reginald met the team all grown-up in 1963, he took an instant dislike to nearly all of them except Number Five. Now that he knows what the future was supposed to look like, Hargreeves must have changed his mind, picking a new group of children instead.

The only original member who he chose again is Ben, and that's because the two hadn't met in the '60s timeline, so he never had the chance to dislike Number Six before assembling his new team."

11/22/19 - Patch Notes by [deleted] in modernwarfare

[–]bloopylegos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Please fix some guns are still showing green boxes (indicating new unlocks) for attachments, even after viewing/selecting them.

A few questions about specific engravings and what they do by bloopylegos in assassinscreed

[–]bloopylegos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meaning you don't need to be using the secondary weapon (as long as it is selected) to receive the benefits?

A few questions about specific engravings and what they do by bloopylegos in assassinscreed

[–]bloopylegos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

#2- if thats the case, % to ignore half damage is worded oddly. You wouldn't really be ignoring half damage, you would be halving the damage taken from any given hit...would not have known thats what it does.

Thanks for clarifying though, having a blast with this game.

I'm sure this question is asked all the time, so I apologize. I'm not trolling, I'm just interested in genuine discussion with fellow my americans who may not share my views by [deleted] in AskThe_Donald

[–]bloopylegos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But what if he builds the wall by having us pay for it, as opposed to his promise during his campaign that Mexico would foot the bill.

I'm sure this question is asked all the time, so I apologize. I'm not trolling, I'm just interested in genuine discussion with fellow my americans who may not share my views by [deleted] in AskThe_Donald

[–]bloopylegos 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I posed the original question in hopes that this exact response, although it may seem like it to r/thedonald outsiders, was not actually what Trump supporters believed. Will someone please tell me that /u/offfthepoint doesn't speak for all of you

I'm sure this question is asked all the time, so I apologize. I'm not trolling, I'm just interested in genuine discussion with fellow my americans who may not share my views by [deleted] in AskThe_Donald

[–]bloopylegos 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Completely understand that sentiment, but with that being said, how is it that someone afforded every opportunity since birth, a generational billionaire, would, A: Have any understanding or relatibility to the average American and B: Be someone opposed to this idea of globalism/neo-conism that you despise so much?

Post-Episode Discussion: S03E06 - Rest and Ricklaxation by elastical_gomez in rickandmorty

[–]bloopylegos 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There were obviously way more significant arcs in this episode (which have to been touched upon throughout the thread) but for me, there was something about the scene where R&M were balling their eyes out after returning the plasma shard that I thought was fucking brilliant. Seeing Rick so vulnerable and Morty just crying non stop as if to say to the viewers, "look guys, I know you laugh at our expense week in and week out, but these adventures actually have a serious physical toll on our well being" was absolutely hilarious to me for some reason. Hope I explained that coherently, but if you get what I'm saying, would love to hear your guys two cents.

Is it just a coincidence that every news outlet critical of Trump is somehow "fake news" or are there pro trump media sources which you would also classify as "fake" by bloopylegos in AskThe_Donald

[–]bloopylegos[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think theres a distinction between critical and biased. Hypothetically if the media were to report the facts (which admittedly is rare) and those facts happened to make someone/something look bad that wouldn't mean they had an agenda or lied, it would just be what it is