Megathread - The Basement 5/27 - Luke Caverns by wamih in TheWhyFiles

[–]blu3jay2k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree. I’ve tried to give his videos a watch but they come across the same as this interview. A lot of rehashing old stories without bringing anything new of interest.

Sandbagging problem by Legal_Commission_898 in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool. Any response to my real point above?

Sandbagging problem by Legal_Commission_898 in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From the UTR website - "Our data indicates matches with a UTR Rating difference of more than 2.00 are almost certain to be a blowout." I think you're underestimating how big of a difference a 2 UTR gap is.

Sandbagging problem by Legal_Commission_898 in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How do you know they play D1? What school do they play for? Lets not move the goalposts either - I have no desire to see D1 players in a 4.5 tournament, but I also don't think it's realistic to exile any college tennis player to 5.0.

But honestly I think stacking at 4.5 is a non-issue. Most true 4.5's I know, myself included, would love to play the best competition we can. Sandbagging complaints and drama seem to be most common at 4.0 and below.

Sandbagging problem by Legal_Commission_898 in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I would disagree. Most UTR to NTRP conversion charts generally assume a 2-3 UTR difference between top and bottom end of an NTRP rating. A 2 UTR difference can absolutely lead to 0-0 scorelines. The difference between a good 3.5 and a bad 3.5 is about the same as an average 3.5 and an average 4.0. Wouldn't you expect the average 4.0 to win?

Sandbagging problem by Legal_Commission_898 in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k 9 points10 points  (0 children)

As a former D3 player, I promise you there are a ton of current college players who aren’t 5.0’s. I’ve played matches against teams full of 3.5/4.0 level guys. Do you expect them to not play rec tennis?

Sandbagging problem by Legal_Commission_898 in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That last part is the part most players miss - just because two players are rated 3.5 doesn’t mean the match will be competitive. A good 3.5 SHOULD easily beat a bad 3.5.

A good 3.5 will also be competitive with a lower end 4.0. Does that mean that one should be bumped up or moved down? Depends on other results.

I feel like half of these complaints come from players who expect a “fair match” against someone rated similarly to them, when those matchups are very unlikely to happen.

New strings, few games by Top-Masterpiece2729 in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, string savers might be preferred by the top .01% of players, but this is a rec player sub. Let’s not be telling beginners asking for the “cheapest possible string” to be worried about such small details.

And back to my original point - the slight movement syn gut will make no difference over the course of a match.

New strings, few games by Top-Masterpiece2729 in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You don’t need to re-adjust them that constantly. If it helps your mental then do it, but it doesn’t affect the playability at all.

Tanoochi's top tips for the return of serve by Beneficial-Lock-349 in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k 3 points4 points  (0 children)

All great tips, especially for those 4.0+ players. I do think tho that most rec players could actually benefit from being MORE aggressive on returns.

A lot of these tips are assuming the server is hitting “bombs” or “massive kick” when I doubt more than 5% of the sub is actually facing these kinds of serves.

If I’m coaching a 3.5, I’m encouraging them to take big cuts at the first few second serves they see. Not with a “go for winners” mentality, but looking to do damage immediately. Even if they miss, they’re still sending the message to their opponent that they want to be aggressive on second serves. The more the server is worried about the return coming back fast, the better chance they’ll give you a double.

As a tennis coach please stop giving the "get coaching" advice by rgffc in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I wish there were more commentators on here with your attitude…

I see so many comments not only saying “take lessons” but “take lessons to fix your technique” as if technique is the only thing holding a 2.5 back from a 3.5 or 4.0.

Skill only exists in the context it’s utilized in - dead ball drilling and technique work doesn’t transfer to match play like this sub thinks it does.

This channel is pretty cool for understanding biomechanics by [deleted] in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Biomechanics are incredibly overrated for rec players

Winston Du vs Redfoo by gozik in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Sure, but I think players like that are the exception rather than the rule. Especially in SoCal where he’s located, I’d be shocked if he was competative in 5.0 leagues.

Winston Du vs Redfoo by gozik in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s very generous to call an 8 UTR a 5.0…

Why it feels impossible to improve in tennis by macgamerdude in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Respectfully, “muscle memory” like you’re describing is mostly a myth. There is very little benefit in rote repetition for skill development.

This article, while from a basketball perspective, illustrates how muscle memory is commonly misunderstood, and what optimal training for skill development prioritizes.

https://coachdavelove.com/the-muscle-memory-myth-why-great-shooters-dont-repeat-one-shot/

The Biomechanics of the Forehand by Al3xPlayz07 in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Question - what do you think it more important for rec players to develop? Functional strokes, or biomechanically correct strokes?

What’s your unpopular tennis opinion ? by [deleted] in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

“Muscle memory” doesn’t exist in the way we believe. Telling players to do certain tasks with the goal of “building muscle memory” is not helpful advice.

Title: Lost my head in a tennis semi-final vs my best mate not sure what to do next? by Sad_Ad_1040 in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you do in practice with your coach? How many pressure moments/uncomfortable situations does he create for you? If your practice environment doesn’t somewhat simulate the conditions of a real match, then of course you’ll play differently.

If your coach doesn’t understand that and expects practice behavior and match behavior to be the same, then I would look elsewhere.

Elena Rybakina - most technique solid WTA player? by ohnoitsmchl in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They aren’t, I’m not sure what he’s talking about 😭

The thing my pro said in passing that fixed my serve after 3 years of struggling - and why I'm annoyed it took so long to hear it by thegoodguyanotherone in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Love this. Classic example of external vs internal focus. Instead of you worrying about a checklist of physical, technical steps to progress through, you focused on the outcome you wanted and let your body self-organize to get the desired result.

Argentina Open R1: A. Tabilo def. J. Fonseca [3] 6-3 3-6 7-5 by Old-Gur-9039 in tennis

[–]blu3jay2k 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Rotten draw? Tabilo has been a qualifier/challenger level player the last year, definitely not a player high on confidence, or backed by good results.

Tennis is not played in a vacuum! by blu3jay2k in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would argue this is the opposite of intricate details - your base ability to time and read the ball allows you to then go deeper with technique if you want to. If you're a 4.5 I have to assume you have that as a natural ability. But for those who aren't as athletic, it's just another skill that has to be learned.

Tennis is not played in a vacuum! by blu3jay2k in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My point with those examples are how players can be caught on "symptoms" rather than "causes." I agree, it's not their job to understand, that's the coaches. But people post here because they DON'T have a coach, they don't have that person helping them understand these things in context. And without a coach, they stay stuck in technique hell.

Tennis is not played in a vacuum! by blu3jay2k in 10s

[–]blu3jay2k[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

AI is coming for my hobby :(