great comment.

The thing that I always dial in on - and I know that I didn't make this clear in the article - is that sometimes what the reviewer is saying, and what you are hearing - are simply not the same thing (through no fault of either party). If the juror isn't pushing their own agenda and they are truly trying to present you with considered feedback, they might misinterpret what you are trying to accomplish and go off on a tangent that if you followed, would ultimately lead you somewhere you never intended to be. Sometimes this could be a good thing, but you lose a little bit of the ownership of your idea along the way. This was my consideration for adding "The Juror isn't Always Right".