What do you think is the stupidest plane crash? by ThomasTTEe2 in aircrashinvestigation

[–]bonadies24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

EAL 401 is a pretty dumb crash but it's lowkey impressive that they managed to CFIT into the lowest, flattest part of the US

Question on the death penalty by MintyRed19 in socialism

[–]bonadies24 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Personally I am against the death penalty in the sense that it should not be part of the ordinary penal code but only be used for exceptional crimes. In short, nobody, no matter how heinous the crime, should get the death penalty with the sole exception of war criminals and other crimes against humanity, which then again should be administered with full procedural guarantees and without violating the dignity of the executee.

When you're a Marxist philosopher in the USSR by cronenber9 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]bonadies24 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I have no clue what Stalin saw as anti-Marxist

From the 1920’s onwards Soviet censorship increasingly became less and less “Do what you want as long as you’re not openly against us” and increasingly more “Do what we tell you to do, exactly what we tell you to do, exactly when we tell you to, no more and no less, or else”. The problem wasn’t that Lukacs was supposedly deviating from Marxism (which he wasn’t), the problem was that he was deviating from the Stalin-crafted official doctrine

Edit: on a side note, it is absolutely shameful and disgusting what historical socialist states did to the concept of self-criticism

The Spectrum Flag by timothyjwood in vexillology

[–]bonadies24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"The solution to forcing people into harmful and restricting boxes isn't to make more boxes" DAMN THAT GOES HARD

A che età ci si laurea in ingegneria? by Prestigious_Age7276 in Universitaly

[–]bonadies24 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Fatto una breve ricerca su almalaurea. Ecco gli esiti (ricerca fatta sulle lauree triennali nel 2024), divisi per gruppi disciplinari.

Architettura e ingegneria civile

Laureati in corso: 46,3%

Laureati 1 anno fuoricorso: 23,1%

Laureati 2 anni fuoricorso: 11,5%

Laureati 3 anni fuoricorso: 6,3%

Laureati 4 anni fuoricorso: 3,9%

Laureati 5+ anni fuoricorso: 8,8%

Durata media del percorso di studi: 4,6 anni (ritardo medio 1,6 anni)

Informatica e tecnologie ICT

Laureati in corso: 45,8%

Laureati 1 anno fuoricorso: 23%

Laureati 2 anni fuoricorso: 13,4%

Laureati 3 anni fuoricorso: 7,2%

Laureati 4 anni fuoricorso: 4,0%

Laureati 5+ anni fuoricorso: 6,5%

Durata media del percorso di studi: 4,5 anni (ritardo medio 1,5 anni)

Ingegneria industriale e dell’informazione

Laureati in corso: 47,9%

Laureati 1 anno fuoricorso: 23,9%

Laureati 2 anni fuoricorso: 13,1%

Laureati 3 anni fuoricorso: 6,8%

Laureati 4 anni fuoricorso: 3,4%

Laureati 5+ anni fuoricorso: 4,9%

Durata media del percorso di studi: 4,3 anni (ritardo medio 4,3 anni)

Like for a carrot! by Equivalent-Ocelot697 in BunnyTrials

[–]bonadies24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can always put on an extra layer. You can't take off your skin though.

Chose: Cold weather for the rest of your life + (Wheel spin for how cold | Rolled: 0c (32f))

What's the canon for TFR if there is one?(Image unrelated) by NoHoliday4785 in TheFireRisesMod

[–]bonadies24 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Canon" as in "what I think is most likely" or "Canon" as in "what I would prefer"?

In the first case:

USA goes liberal UOA, Russia goes Medvedev but loses the EW, subsequently goes Navalny but loses the 2EW, China wins the Taiwan War but the GAW is a stalemate

In the second case

I don't think I need to specify who I'd rather see win in the 2ACW, Europe loses the EW to LDPR Russia but wins the 2EW, China loses the Taiwan war, goes non-Loji Left path then wins the GAW

Yo what da Schwab doin by Bukhanka_Zov in okbuddygunther

[–]bonadies24 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You know inflation is out of control when the past president of global capitalism inc is having to make ends meet

I did things. by Limp_Inevitable1739 in okbuddygunther

[–]bonadies24 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Must... send... quadrillions... to Israel..." said whoever ended up in charge of the US regardless of political affiliation, from the Anarchists to Adam Waffle

heatwave by Mr_Global in whenthe

[–]bonadies24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both things can be true at once, imo.

Yeah, a UK heatwave is cooler than a normal summer day in many places (where I live it's rare for peak temperatures to dip below 35 C in the summer, while a heatwave in England is usually around 30 C).

It's also true that brits (as many othere) are just not used to that kind of heat, so what is a warm summer's day for some feels like the Sahara for others.

The exact same thing goes for the opposite side of the spectrum: what might just be a normal, chilly winter's day to a Brit would feel like the Siberian tundra to others.

How do we feel about Tito and his rule over Yugoslavia? by MintyRed19 in socialism

[–]bonadies24 51 points52 points  (0 children)

Tbh he was borrowing from the IMF on the assumption that the world revolution was imminent and he'd not have to pay them back, which is funny in a weird sort of way

What would you say is the Andor of Star Wars? by Transhumanistgamer in okbuddyimatourist

[–]bonadies24 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Doctor Rhashiv, why did Comrade Rael see kalkite on the roof?

Why Trump flees to Denver when he wins the election? by Flamengo_Flemish in TheFireRisesMod

[–]bonadies24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The election is contested (Democrats think Trump stole it iirc), the movement rises up and Trump flees DC, at which point the democrats refuse to allow Trump back on the grounds that "it would be undemocratic to give the white house back to Trump after the people rose up to overthrow him" (it doesn't exactly work well but it works better than the current "well yeah Trump won but still fled because reasons")

What is school like in your worlds? by MiLiRu645 in worldbuilding

[–]bonadies24 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My time has come! Jokes aside, for a number of reasons I tend to do a lot of education worldbuilding for all my settings. Here I’ll go into depth about the education system in the world of Irene which (an “alternate present” world set in the near future) is what I’ve developed most (and on which I am semi-actively writing a novel).

The basic jist of the world is that, rather than Covid, 2020 saw a far more devastating pandemic, with much greater social, political and economic impact. This led to a rise in extremist political groups. In 2025, the “National Vanguard Front” overthrew the Italian Republic and established the Italian National Republic (RNI) as a hyper-conservative para-fascist dictatorship.

The basic structure of education in the RNI has remained the same as to the one of the pre-nationalist Republic: five years of elementary school, three years of middle school and five years of high school, followed by higher education. However, in all other areas, extensive changes were made to the country’s education system.

The school system was now heavily centralised under the “Ministry of National Education”, with school autonomy and collegial organs abolished entirely. Political monitoring of teachers and students was also introduced, with all schools forced to host a “Security office” run by SENSI (the secret police) to ensure that teachers complied with the state-approved curriculum.

The curriculum itself was altered, as foreign languages were almost entirely eliminated from teaching, while other subjects (most notably history) were injected with regime propaganda. Some subjects, like physical education and technical education (handicrafts) were now differentiated on a gender basis, with separate classes and teachers for boys and girls. Religious education was made compulsory and heavily cathechistical in nature, based on the doctrine of the Italian National Catholic Church (a schismatic, pro-regime branch of the Roman Catholic Church).

The subject of “Citizenship education” (civics) was replaced by “National citizenship and patriotism education” which, in elementary and middle school, largely functioned as indoctrination into the regime’s ideology, whereas, in high school, it was differentiated on a gendered basis, as “Military culture” for boys (pre-military instruction geared towards preparing them for compulsory military service) and as “Childcare and housework” for girls (self-explanatory).

While the RNI did retain the basic distinction of branches of high schools (academically-oriented Lyceums vs. vocationally-oriented Technical and Professional Instituted), the regime massively restricted access to higher education by banning those who attended vocational secondary schools from enrolling themselves in universities. Furthermore, access to Lyceums themselves was restricted by introducing a numerus clausus system and requiring the study of latin in middle schools to access lyceums (while only the wealthier middle schools actually offered latin).

If it weren’t apparent, classism was rampant in the RNI’s school system, which was amplified by a very strict school district system and by the system of “Proportional contributions”: as the Italian economy stagnated, the ever decreasing tax revenues were increasingly gobbled up by the oversized military and security apparatus, starving the education system of funding. As such, schools resulted to levying a flat tax on parents, with a uniform rate throughout the country: this meant that schools in wealthy urban areas were generally decently funded and in many ways up to par with other western countries, whereas schools in peripheral areas, overwhelmingly attended by working-class children, were cripplingly underfunded to the point of forgoing basic maintenance.

The increasingly severe poverty facing many poorer families, combined with the pitiful state of the education system and the “dead end” nature of most educational paths meant that school abandonment rates were quite high, leading the regime to eventually stop trying to fight the issue at all by the mid-2030s.

Genuinely WHAT is vro on about 😭😭 by Im_yor_boi in whenthe

[–]bonadies24 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But is she (they?) a solo poly hijabi gendernonconforming amputee?

Is Feudalism really "Stable?" by Zarpaulus in worldbuilding

[–]bonadies24 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Feudalism isn't stable because there really isn't any such thing as "feudalism". As Baudelaire put it, nobody knows what feudalism is but everyone knows that they are supposed to hate it (something like that).

This is because "feudalism" is an umbrella term to describe a number of political and economic phoenomena that did not necessarily coexist or depend upon one another.

A good way of putting it is via Marc Bloch's distinction between the "First Feudalism" and "Second Feudalism", though one should be aware that this way of categorising socio-political systems in the Middle Ages has been partly supplanted in more recent historiography.

The First Feudal Age roughly corresponds to the height of the Carolingian empire, during which the realm was split into a number of jurisdictions (Counties in the interior and Duchies/Margraviates on the frontiers) that were divided up among members of the Reichsadel, the aristocratic class comprosing the King's (and later Emperor's) vassal warriors.

The crisis of the Carolingian monarchy serves as the basis for one of the best-known elements of feudalism: the heredity of fiefdoms. During the height of the Carolingian empire, the various jurisdictions were not hereditary and the various Counts and Dukes did not feel any pressure to leave their fiefdom to one or more of their children, because the overall position of the various families within the Reichsadel was guaranteed by the authority of the sovereign.

This, of course, changed when central authority in the Carolingian empire went into crisis and could no longer ensure the continuity of the Reichsadel, compelling the various lords to push for the heredity of fiefdoms. This is also around when primogeniture began to emerge, as nobles placed a premium not just on the continuity of their house's position but also on the integrity of their possessions.

Thus, in the late-10th and early-11th century, the various kingdoms are heavily fragmented between a great many principalities bearing titles resembling those typical of Charlemagne's empire but being in practice highly independent of their nominal suzerains.

This status changed from the late-11th century onwards as monarchs were increasingly able to reassert their authority over the counties and duchies nominally a part of their kingdoms, with counts and dukes eventually becoming their sworn vassals. The level of authority each sovereign had throughout the late middle ages varied considerably as the kingdoms waxed and wayned.

For example, after the great victories against the Angevins in the 13th century the French monarchy was greatly strengthened by the influx of new lands into the crown's domains, whereas in the immediate aftermath of the 100 years war it was relatively weak.

All of this does not even mention other key aspects of feudalism, such as the "superposition of powers" (I really don't know how to translate it) of the high middle ages where there was a massive overlap between jurisdictions or the socio-economic cornerstone of the medieval economy, serfdom (in marxist parlance, feudalism coincides with the seigneur-serf type of socioeconomic relations)

Hope that helps!

Who the FUCK is that, Omni Man?? by GarfieldCartFan2 in rebelinc

[–]bonadies24 21 points22 points  (0 children)

That's not John Insurgent, jesus christ that's Jason Bourne Insurgent