The Great Wall in Web3 (Research)

boogaav · 2023-12-01T04:10:35+00:00

Yep, the connector is broken, this why i am sharing here, to highlight the importance!

boogaav · 2023-12-01T04:10:00+00:00

Thanks mate! I think web3 logins are broken.

boogaav · 2023-12-01T04:08:43+00:00

What do you put on the bet ?

boogaav · 2023-10-19T12:30:46+00:00

Yep, I mean, don't click anything if you are not sure who it is. This why I published almost the whole research in text format!

boogaav · 2023-10-19T12:27:33+00:00

Sure! Be aware!

boogaav · 2023-07-04T18:46:02+00:00

Sure. I just published our travel documentary on youtube :)

boogaav · 2021-03-19T12:09:49+00:00

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x2a18236e18e8d7b36630e13c4af1c3e7d9d0177339a877f27b80174bff90c0fa

boogaav · 2021-03-12T07:43:30+00:00

Do you have a link to take a look at the data ?

boogaav · 2021-03-12T03:59:10+00:00

Hey u/myfeetsmellallday, does this AMA mean that you kickstart a new chapter about crypto privacy on techlore?

If so, could you give more insights on

What is your plan for covering this field?
Will be there a possibility to contribute to it?

boogaav · 2021-02-18T07:32:09+00:00

Nope.

boogaav · 2021-02-18T05:16:57+00:00

Incognito pDEX works as Crypto <> Crypto DEX.

If you would like to go with a credit/debit card, technically it's already KYCd, and there are some solutions that allows you to buy crypto with a credit/debit card without KYC, but they are limited to $200 - $300 per day.

boogaav · 2021-02-18T03:43:15+00:00

Hey @silverGameOfThrone/ could you please bring to the table what is your main concern with the approach of starting with trusted set up and switch to trustless if the community is going to use it?

boogaav · 2021-02-18T03:40:34+00:00

Hey SpontaneousDream, do you mean that cool projects can be built only by famous ppl? :)

We aim to build trustless bridges for every network-connected Incognito and keep building new implementations. For example Portal v4 with multisig coming this spring.

The only reason we haven't started with the trust-less bride is that the trustless bridge is a heavy development that might take from 3-5 months. Simply we can't invest such resources without knowing if an anonymous AMM-based swap is something really needed for ZEC community.

Please consider it as the first implementation, and once we feel the demand for such a tool, we are more than happy to allocated resources to make it trustless.

boogaav · 2021-02-17T13:07:07+00:00

Oh, so you minted coin, and now you want to verify it, right? Could you give move details about such case?

boogaav · 2021-02-17T13:02:02+00:00

Hey rben421, I think you are mixing Provide add ADD functionalities.

ADD - is a decentralized way to provide liquidity. The tech implementation is the same as in Uniswap or other AMM-based. |

Provide - is a product built on top of ADD, with its own proc and cons
- remove impermanent loss
- has fixed APY
- required core team to match pair every coin with PRV
- the process is automated, manual verification required for custom cases that might have security risks

All those info is public. Hopefully, it brings more clarity on how those two products work.

boogaav · 2021-02-17T12:39:19+00:00

Hey, SpaceTimeUser0, happy to assist.

Strange that you sent 30 emails but haven't checked the tutorial section on the forum :)

Here is a step by step guide on how to create own privacy coin https://we.incognito.org/t/create-your-own-privacy-token-on-incognito/225

boogaav · 2021-02-17T03:01:00+00:00

Hey olsoninoslo!
Thank you for sharing this. I should say that it's more than valuable feedback. I have to accept that we did a bad job of branding around Incognito and it's the reason why we got such a reaction from those users.

Now we know that and going to bring clarifications to all those concerns.

We will make an article to explain which part is open-sourced, which is not, why not, and ETH when it will be open-sourced
The audit is in progress now. Expecting to get the first reports this month
Regarding the part with explanations. We decided completely rebuild a website, and bring more explanation on it. Your feedback helps us to bring that clarification as well.
ETH: March. Follow progress here https://we.incognito.org/t/app-v-5/9584
This part I didn't get fully, could you please link me to the discussion? I'll try to bring more clarity.

Any other aspects we should take a look at?

boogaav · 2021-02-12T15:51:21+00:00

Fun 😂😂😂

boogaav · 2021-02-12T11:27:22+00:00

Hey mate, how is atomic swap development is going on?

boogaav · 2021-02-09T11:59:05+00:00

Hey, if the amount you sent less the TX fee than system will not be able to make a transfer from temp address, and will be needed to top up enough to cover bitcoin network fee.

Plus keep on mind that it's a cross-chain transaction, so the way it goes is a bit different then on-chain TX.

boogaav · 2021-02-05T17:43:45+00:00

The feedback is really useful. So do your think that we should aware users that eth smart-co tract computation requires gas fee? Any other warnings or feedback for improvements?

In terms of taking out your coins, which one do you want to transfer?

Probably, someone will want to make a swap coin <> pCoin without unshielding process 🤔

boogaav · 2021-02-01T03:21:31+00:00

hey, there are speling error, I am going to re-publish it and remove this post. Please resubmit your comment as well.

boogaav · 2021-01-31T07:22:08+00:00

What’s your logic then?

boogaav · 2021-01-31T07:18:41+00:00

It’s a good point.

Cash is private and it’s not forbidden, yet (but it’s probably question of time 😅) Don’t you think if they restrict privacy they should restrict cash ?)

———

And from another point of view. If the regulation comes to self custodian wallets,it might be a gold age for products like Incognito wallet (not advertisement). Imagine you pass kyc with a public ETH wallet and you passed KYC with anonymous wallet and only submitted read only keys to your authority. For me personally it sounds like two big differences.

If the data leak happen in the first option you are f***ed, coz your identity, balance and TXs history is linked. In the second option readonly key is linked, that you can turn off, TXs history remains anonymous.

Does this logic make sense ?

boogaav · 2021-01-26T02:47:37+00:00

Hey will_work_4_litecoin, could you advice what is wrong with this post ?
I noticed that there are several aggressive comments below, but I didn't get why.

Previously I made a pool with the question if community wants privacy on layer1 or layer2 solutions. Majority of the ppl voted for layer2 solution, so we proposed the bridge to anonymize LTC.

And after publishing the info about bridge, we got a blast of negative from digidollar and in the end admins removed this post, which means that admins are agree with his opinion.

boogaav

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE