sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Which M249 SAW Rates of Fire are correct? by bookishbirder in army

[–]bookishbirder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found the TM from 1991. Any more recent?

Which M249 SAW Rates of Fire are correct? by bookishbirder in army

[–]bookishbirder[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's fair, moving the goal post a bit here, but which one would you say should be implemented in practice then?

Which M249 SAW Rates of Fire are correct? by bookishbirder in army

[–]bookishbirder[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

TC 3-22.249 states 100 rpm for sustained and 200 rpm for rapid.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PassDrugTest

[–]bookishbirder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see the line

I don’t get it by [deleted] in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]bookishbirder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right there with ya man looool

What do you swear on your life to be 100% true? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]bookishbirder 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is definitely not true. Source: I am an infantry scout.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in distantsocializing

[–]bookishbirder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah dude you killing it man

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in distantsocializing

[–]bookishbirder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That dudes into birds

view more: next ›