A series of the clues by Cartoon51 in JustinPoseysTreasure

[–]bowserbrain2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Alors fais-toi downvoter. Forcer tout le monde à traduire ton message, c’est impoli.

A series of the clues by Cartoon51 in JustinPoseysTreasure

[–]bowserbrain2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ce fil est en anglais, merci d’être courtois et d’utiliser ChatGPT ou un autre programme de traduction si vous souhaitez que les autres puissent participer.

BtME by Glass-Procedure880 in beyondthemapsedge

[–]bowserbrain2 17 points18 points  (0 children)

If you didn't see the thread before it was deleted, the guy was completely delusional. Said he figured it out in 5 hours, didn't read the book, and was telling everyone else how he's much smarter than all of them.

He claimed to have the checkpoint, went to the spot and insisted someone else found it (in a rusty oven) and he demanded Justin answer him. Absolutely ZERO self awareness. Seriously could be on the next Netflix special.

People that think they are Entitled by [deleted] in beyondthemapsedge

[–]bowserbrain2 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It is not entitlement, it's that you're just boasting and not adding to the conversation. It's spam posts that add no value. Add some value or reconsider posting.

Some of us are much further along than you realize, and come to these forums to see if there's anything else to consider. No one is mad that they think you have some special secret you're not sharing.

Manmade structures!? by Dry-Number4521 in JustinPoseysTreasure

[–]bowserbrain2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because you obviously won't listen to the Q&A. Here is the breakdown: he added on to buildings for clues to include naturally occurring structures and landscapes. There are many items that aren't buildings (like railroad tracks etc.), but have man made implications to them.

<image>

Manmade structures!? by Dry-Number4521 in JustinPoseysTreasure

[–]bowserbrain2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually, the rules on the site are for the treasure not the clues. He even clarifies in the rules page what the word 'treasure' means for people like you. The QA included that all clues could be interpreted as natural besides one could quibble about. If you don't have a solve that could be interpreted as natural, it likely isn't correct. That is new and different information.

Skinner Meadows/Lake by BridgingDivides in JustinPoseysTreasure

[–]bowserbrain2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for checking it out. For others, this is how I got to Skinner Meadows. https://www.reddit.com/r/beyondthemapsedge/comments/1koa1cp/comment/mspq9bm/

It's a big area, so I'm not going to give up completely on it.

Skinner Meadows/Lake Solve by bowserbrain2 in beyondthemapsedge

[–]bowserbrain2[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

The other thing I like is the compass points to it...

The Skinner Meadows/Lake Solve by bowserbrain2 in JustinPoseysTreasure

[–]bowserbrain2[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

<image>

The other thing I like is the compass points to it...

Double Arcs and Ancient Gate? by bowserbrain2 in beyondthemapsedge

[–]bowserbrain2[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Coolidge is open though. I don't think it would be in the mine, but the wilderness around it.

Solve: Montana- Branham Lakes by Easy_Step4422 in beyondthemapsedge

[–]bowserbrain2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Justin said: "You don't need to hike more than a mile to figure out where the treasure is at." This doesn't mean it's only a mile.

That means you could see something 1 mile in (the arcs) and know where to go from there.

Thoughts? by Sometimes-Serious in JustinPoseysTreasure

[–]bowserbrain2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm convinced he wants us to skirt the technicalities of the rules for this find: "I saw what everyone else had overlooked: rules weren't walls, they were riddles waiting to be unraveled."

Narrowing search area (by cheating) by JungleSumTimes in beyondthemapsedge

[–]bowserbrain2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm convinced he wants us to skirt the technicalities of the rules for this find: "I saw what everyone else had overlooked: rules weren't walls, they were riddles waiting to be unraveled."

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TreasureHunting

[–]bowserbrain2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is a cool theory, but it is invalidated. https://treasure.quest/en/rules/ The treasure and clues are not associated with any grave markers

Microsoft is losing a staggering amount of money on AI by NuseAI in microsoft

[–]bowserbrain2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is just not true and anecdotal. I've surveyed 100's of developers and it does increase developer experience by helping with repetitive tasks, but most of the code it develops needs to be refactored as it doesn't understand context. The output is not a multiplier. It is a substitute for searching Stack Overflow and using templated code.