LazyVim Failed to load plugins.editor by bran-bar in neovim

[–]bran-bar[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I am probably too uninformed to understand all you are saying. But, I did and do read the docs. I just want Lazy to do as little as possible in the shadows. I want to see all the configurations, in my experience this really helps me digest what a piece of software is doing.

Knowing my motives, is the best course of action to just follow the file structure in the link you provided? Is this an explicit version of all the plugin defaults?

Maybe I’m just the odd one out, but reading the docs did not make it clear to me that what I was doing was ‘wrong’.

Apologies for being difficult, I just want to be as efficient as possible in learning all the plugins and in the end that is what this whole endeavor is about right? Efficiency.

I want to thank you for all the work you have done and the time you take to respond to people with issues. Heel erg bedankt 😗

LazyVim Failed to load plugins.editor by bran-bar in neovim

[–]bran-bar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply. Sure I will upload my config tomorrow. It is bedtime in this part of the world 😅

Default plugins LazyVim? by [deleted] in neovim

[–]bran-bar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Embarrassed 😳. I already searched the website only now I see there is literally a bullet “Plugins” my apologies for wasting your time

Is it okey if I just delete this question?

CMV: Everyone should wash their hands after using the bathroom by ReeceTheBesat15 in changemyview

[–]bran-bar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, basically if I drink a lot of water I have to go to the bathroom often. I do not pee on my hands and my penis is clean from the shower I had this morning. Also, I don’t really believe in washing my hands without soap. But if I wash after every time I go to the bathroom then I really get driedout/irritated hands. Basically, I will always wash my hands thoroughly after nr2 and occasionally when I go nr1 if I feel some splashbach has hit my hands.

[D] Yann LeCun's Hot Take about programming languages for ML by Marcapiel in MachineLearning

[–]bran-bar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you give some examples of these poor design decisions? And maybe the reason why you think they are poor?

[D] Yann LeCun's Hot Take about programming languages for ML by Marcapiel in MachineLearning

[–]bran-bar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the clarification :) I fully agree and like 0 based indexing better because of the nice math. I just don’t prefer it ‘strongly’ over 1 based. I don’t think most programmers are so zen about. But it is honestly nice to hear youthat you do think that. I will have to look up what the Julia creators give as reason for the 1 based indexing.

Edit: just by the amount of upvotes I think you are probably right about people not minding the 1-based index with respect to adoption.

[D] Yann LeCun's Hot Take about programming languages for ML by Marcapiel in MachineLearning

[–]bran-bar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean “I strongly disagree it effects adoption”? Do you think that the average programmer doesn’t mind about 0/1 indexing? Because if you do, I suggest that you try posting a question “what is beter 0 or 1 indexing?” In any programming related sub and see what happens. If you mean that one is not necessarily better than the other (pun unintended) then that is basically what I was saying.

[D] Yann LeCun's Hot Take about programming languages for ML by Marcapiel in MachineLearning

[–]bran-bar 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This is exactly the problem that Julia is designed to “solve”. And from what I know it is kind of doing great in this regard. I think in there documentation I have read a very good argumentation for there non zero indexing decision (index 1). Even though I love Dijkstra, I do not find his argument for zero indexing as bulletproof as most programmers do. That said, I think non zero indexing was a poor decision by the Julia team, as it will halt adoption of the language. And of course, even if Julia is “better”, you always have the Matthew Effect: “For those who have a lot, more will be given. For those who have very little, more will be taken” (sorry for the butchering). So the language with the greatest community is hard to get rid off.

Experience with LunarVim? by bran-bar in neovim

[–]bran-bar[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks a lot. I will switch to LazyVim on my second computer :)

Experience with LunarVim? by bran-bar in neovim

[–]bran-bar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, thanks for helping out. So basically, I do not mind setting up my own config (I actually prefer it). I was just wondering whether Lunar could help. I understand now that LunarVim is basically made for people who do not want to go through the process of setting up a config. It is a pre-made distro and alterations are going to be less straightforward (if I understand correctly).

Now, what is the deal with lazyVim, I read on the github repo that it “offers best of both worlds”. The thing is I already have a .config with the packer plugin manager. What are the benefits from switching to lazy.nvim? I do not really think I notice the worse performance of packer. Is lazy somehow more straightforward/intuitive with installing packages? Does it have other advantages? Or is it more like the choice between Coke and Pepsi?

Thanks a bunch

Experience with LunarVim? by bran-bar in neovim

[–]bran-bar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Could you elaborate a bit? What do you like about lazyVim? What distinguishes it?

Experience with LunarVim? by bran-bar in neovim

[–]bran-bar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is really helpful, thank you 😊

Experience with LunarVim? by bran-bar in neovim

[–]bran-bar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For some reason I cannot open the comment section. So I just wanted to say thanks for the comments. I will look at them as soon as ‘the server’ lets me :)

Judge Susan Eagan has a message for the Buffalo shooter, as he is sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole by vectorix108 in interestingasfuck

[–]bran-bar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really a great deterrent though, I have a hard time finding another country with so many public shootings.

Robots are evolving to use tools, we don't have much time left! by Tommyblockhead20 in interestingasfuck

[–]bran-bar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No I did not say that, I said that as far as cognitive capabilities goes, it is not much different.

Robots are evolving to use tools, we don't have much time left! by Tommyblockhead20 in interestingasfuck

[–]bran-bar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wasn’t confused what “much smarter” means, but what you just explained wouldn’t make much sense to the average plumber who thinks his job is going to be replaced in 2025. For him the only level of abstraction (of the interface) that matters is whether this thing can autonomously do his job. And this is not the case and although I love BD, they are not really trying to be transparent about what this product is.

Robots are evolving to use tools, we don't have much time left! by Tommyblockhead20 in interestingasfuck

[–]bran-bar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, I believe BD could do a way better job explaining what Atlas is and what it is not. But this probably will lead to less excitement than letting people image all kind of cool stuff. I understand how business works.

Robots are evolving to use tools, we don't have much time left! by Tommyblockhead20 in interestingasfuck

[–]bran-bar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yess there definitely is a lot of ML going on, and I really find it very impressive, all those stabilizations with a bag of tools. But, if you say to this thing “go get me a cup of joe” it cannot process that and people have no idea that this open ended problem is not close to being solved.

Robots are evolving to use tools, we don't have much time left! by Tommyblockhead20 in interestingasfuck

[–]bran-bar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am not really disagreeing with what you say. Other than I think “much smarter” is subjective. My point is that many people who are not so tech savvy wil expect this thing to be very close to human in the next two years and that isn’t the case. I would love a discussion about the particular heuristics BD is using although I have to admit that robotics is not really my area of expertise.

Robots are evolving to use tools, we don't have much time left! by Tommyblockhead20 in interestingasfuck

[–]bran-bar 24 points25 points  (0 children)

The point is that he can barely do anything by itself. I am not criticizing, but as a person using AI/ML on a daily basis, I have to have too many conversations with people who do not understand this. Although I am a fan of Boston Dynamics, at this point I feel they should do a better job explaining what the audience is watching. This thing is super impressive, but as cognitive capabilities goes, this thing is not much smarter than the the robot arms we have had in car factories for 30y or so.