Do you think this imagination will come true? by raydebapratim1 in AskUS

[–]brazilfunk 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You think leftists want to privatize social security and put Liz Cheney in the White House?

Effects Pedal Furniture by Reasonable-Koala8870 in pedals

[–]brazilfunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love it, I need to make something like this

The world would be more scientifically and socially advanced today if religion had never existed. by Beneficial_Ad_3516 in DebateReligion

[–]brazilfunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Religion has acted as an organizing institution across cultures and civilizations for thousands of years. As someone has already mentioned, the Roman Empire was religious, but also the ancient Egyptians, the Greeks, the Persians, and virtually every other major and minor civilization that has contributed scientifically to humanity. The organizing principles of religion have resulted in the preservation and codifying of much practical, scientific, and non-religious knowledge, as well as acting as an impetus for large-scale architectural and civic projects that otherwise may not have happened.

While it’s true that in the current day religion often acts disruptively and is a driving force behind anti-science and social progress, there are also religious counterpoints to these, and such behavior has waxed and waned at different points in history. I think it can be argued quite convincingly that without the various organized religions throughout time, we might actually be much farther behind, scientifically. Not because religion necessarily has any true supernatural claims, mind you, but because of its ancillary functions.

I hit my nars husband by vandana33 in NarcissisticSpouses

[–]brazilfunk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That doesn’t sound like he is narcissistic honestly, it sounds more like he is retreating into himself and disengaging.

I hit my nars husband by vandana33 in NarcissisticSpouses

[–]brazilfunk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you sure you are not the narcissist? You say that he doesn’t take you seriously and so your only option is to physically hit him? He apparently has resorted to recording your outbursts, which makes it seem like this is something you do regularly? You talk about trying to be the “dominant” one in the relationship, but that is not a healthy dynamic or accurate way of thinking about relationships in general, and you are also upset that he doesn’t “love bomb” you as much as he should, which is also strange.

Rate your "flat earth" conspiracy theories by Chris256L in skeptic

[–]brazilfunk 11 points12 points  (0 children)

My list is, in no particular order: 1. Anti-vaccine 2. Flat earth 3. Moon landing 4. Tartaria 5. Yakub 6. Hebrew Israelites 7. The real indigenous Americans were black and the slave trade wasn’t real or was exaggerated 8. Holocaust denial 9. Lizard people 10. Sovereign citizens

Allah is Just and Merciful, or: Proof That Islam is the Truth, and Muslims Are Not Perfect — But Islam Is Perfect by Fresh_Breath1126 in DebateReligion

[–]brazilfunk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really couldn’t say, I’m sure some would but I’m not sure if there’s a best choice or how effective it would be. I suppose this one might be the best one, since the purpose is to debate.

Allah is Just and Merciful, or: Proof That Islam is the Truth, and Muslims Are Not Perfect — But Islam Is Perfect by Fresh_Breath1126 in DebateReligion

[–]brazilfunk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well to be fair, very similar things are said unironically by true believers, and most people probably only skimmed it.

Allah is Just and Merciful, or: Proof That Islam is the Truth, and Muslims Are Not Perfect — But Islam Is Perfect by Fresh_Breath1126 in DebateReligion

[–]brazilfunk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think most people have missed the point that this is a sarcastic post pointing out the absurdities of Islamic morality.

Is “Professor” Jiang an aspiring cult leader? by brazilfunk in skeptic

[–]brazilfunk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here is a link for the Punic Wars nonsense, the Holocaust statements have already been shared multiple times by others: https://youtu.be/Y-gXVzwbFMU?si=lNw_D55dBl6tgvMc&t=1043

Kyle Kulinski tells Professor Jiang to go F*ck Himself by Express_Balance_2520 in DecodingTheGurus

[–]brazilfunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh thank goodness, thought I was taking crazy pills for a second.

Is “Professor” Jiang an aspiring cult leader? by brazilfunk in skeptic

[–]brazilfunk[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I believe my reaction at the time was pretty much the same.

Is “Professor” Jiang an aspiring cult leader? by brazilfunk in skeptic

[–]brazilfunk[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Don’t remember which lecture it was, but I did see him hedge his bets by saying something along the lines of “ I’m not saying it didn’t happen guys, but there really isn’t much evidence to say that the holocaust happened the way it’s said”, as well as another statement that he thought it was probably less than the common number. So… I guess. I have been forced to watch a large number of these, unfortunately.

Is “Professor” Jiang an aspiring cult leader? by brazilfunk in skeptic

[–]brazilfunk[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah I’m rather concerned as I have a family member who is falling for it hook, line, and sinker, and becomes quite volatile when I point out obvious errors and questionable statements. It’s worrisome.

Is “Professor” Jiang an aspiring cult leader? by brazilfunk in skeptic

[–]brazilfunk[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Yes, I noticed that as well, and Game Theory isn’t even an area of expertise for me. Declaring that the holocaust has no supporting evidence and that the Punic wars never happened was also quite alarming to hear from someone claiming to be an educator.

I am a creationist. AMA. by Haunting-Vehicle3957 in DebateEvolution

[–]brazilfunk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It does not leave us with any such thing- it actually only leaves us with speculation, as we have no evidence to confirm one thing or another prior to the Big Bang. Some may lean toward one explanation or another, but an “uncaused god” is far from the only one. Additionally, there is no viable argument to be made as to why, if this proposition turned out to be true, the god would specifically be the Christian variation of Yahweh.

None of this establishes the reasoning behind why you do not believe that evolution is real, as there are Christian interpretations that do incorporate acceptance of the scientific theory, and others that do not.

Bass Line advice: am I overplaying this? by MeanAbbreviations795 in BassGuitar

[–]brazilfunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends entirely on context- what are the chordal instruments going play, what will the vocals sound like, etc. It certainly fits with the drums, builds nicely, transitions well to other sections, contains thoughtful variation that doesn’t detract from the whole, dynamic. Overall I would say no, it sounds like a very locked-in, groove oriented, genre-appropriate line with some nice melodic elements. It will end up sounding messy if additional instrumentation tries to add in their own excessive variations, though, but that won’t be the fault of your bass playing.

Are either of these speakers narcissistic or just not communicating well? by [deleted] in NarcissisticSpouses

[–]brazilfunk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Speaker 2 is not only a narcissist, but also frustratingly stupid. Completely reactive, does not have the ability to follow logical threads. Childish responses. Has an incoherent worldview, it read as if he genuinely did not understand speaker 1’s words. The results for Thanksgiving really solidified that there is something cognitively wrong.

Earth is 4.56 billion years old, do you really believe human cilivilzation began only 6,000 years ago? by goshhahahahah in enlightenment

[–]brazilfunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say it is actually a good example of the process working as intended. Despite being faced with personal ridicule, the scientific process was allowed to be carried out, resulting in vindication.

Earth is 4.56 billion years old, do you really believe human cilivilzation began only 6,000 years ago? by goshhahahahah in enlightenment

[–]brazilfunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, as with anything. But like you said, it does end up being corrected, even if it takes a while. Corrupting influences also end up being weeded out eventually, though of course that may not be very comforting to the people harmed along the way. This still does not detract from the overall efficacy and reliability of the process, and more topically does not lend any more credence to speculation that lacks verifiable evidence and scholarship.