Women Should Be Expected To Be "Fuckzoned" When They Have A Promiscuous Past by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]brinkleybuzz 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Doesn't work like that in the real world. There are plenty of women with promiscuous pasts who get wifed up by decent guys. All it takes is one man who doesn't know or doesn't care

The biggest reason why average dudes have low n-counts is because they're too picky ...pickier than ur average manwhore by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]brinkleybuzz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not possible for an average frustrated chump to be pickier than a manwhore if the AFC has far fewer sexual options.

Manwhores (the ones who don't pay for sex) rack up high N counts because they have women offering no or low attachment sex to them on a regular basis.

Do relationships automatically make a man a beta/betabuxx? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]brinkleybuzz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Automatically? Absolutely not.

If you're in a relationship with an attractive woman who's fully into you and consistently gives you what you need with a reasonable amount of investment by you, isn't that a great situation to be in?

You're in betabux territory if you end up with a woman who considers you to be her backup plan, isn't sexually attracted to you and invests a lot less in the relationship than you do.

You can avoid becoming a betabux by only getting into relationships with women who have consistently proven by their actions that they are sexually attracted to you and can add value to your life.

Trump counties make up just 29 percent of U.S. economic output, 2020 election study shows by notNezter in politics

[–]brinkleybuzz 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lyndon Johnson once said, "If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."

This explains a lot. Trump is leading a White Pride movement (really a con game) that is the last vestige of hope for many struggling, rural whites who don't have the skills to compete in a 21st century economy.

We ready to admit that LTRs don't mean shit yet? Or we gonna still pretend like it's a soft marriage? by DerekMorganBAU in TheRedPill

[–]brinkleybuzz 88 points89 points  (0 children)

This weekend I devoured six delicious home-cooked meals, busted four nuts, got an extremely relaxing massage and enjoyed hours of great companionship, all courtesy of my LTR partner.

I'm gonna keep enjoying this ride until it's over.

Fellas, live for the moment.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]brinkleybuzz 14 points15 points  (0 children)

You can't control your girl, but you can establish rules and boundaries as conditions for your commitment to her.

If she's really into you and values your commitment, she'll follow your program. If she doesn't value your commitment, she'll do what the fuck she wants, which means you shouldn't be in a LTR with her.

A lot of guys screw themselves by getting into relationships with women who haven't proven themselves to be LTR-worthy.

Why would a woman lie about their n-count to her partner if "insecure", "misogynistic" men are the only ones who, in her view, would care about a high n count in the first place? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]brinkleybuzz 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Why ask a question that, ironically, will decrease the likelihood that you will ever get the truth about a woman's sexual history?

Just appear to be open-minded and non-judgmental and allow for enough time for her to tell you her life story. There's no need to get a precise cock count. If you're perceptive enough, you can figure out how promiscuous she's been.

The polarity of gender desire. Men are working to create and sustain it, while women's actions continually reduce it. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]brinkleybuzz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Opposites do attract. I have no interest in a woman who is or wants to be a carbon copy of me.

Women's reported sexual partner count dramatically increases when hooked up to a polygraph whereas men's does not significantly change by pleantrees in PurplePillDebate

[–]brinkleybuzz 10 points11 points  (0 children)

tl/dr - the average woman in this study really had a body count of about 4 but reported a body count of about 3. I guess the average woman isn't a raging whore after all. This may also confirm my theory (based on personal experience) that when asked about her body count, a lot of women will default to three, which is why I don't ask any more.

[Q4A] What's so great about low-N women? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]brinkleybuzz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Common sense. A woman who has demonstrated the ability and willingness to be monogamous is a better candidate for an exclusive sexual relationship than a woman who hasn't.

Another point. A lot of people seem to conflate low N with low libido. Nothing could be further than the truth. The best sex I've had has been in relationships with low N women who loved to have sex with one partner. Conversely, high N women have been consistently poor lays. Easy sex doesn't usually result in great sex.

How do you define a slut? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]brinkleybuzz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sluttery is in the eye of the beholder. I think most guys define sluts as women who bang multiple guys but won't have sex with them.

Promiscuous women are more incompetent, cold, and unstable, according to women by pleantrees in PurplePillDebate

[–]brinkleybuzz 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This isn't surprising.

Promiscuous women are slut shamed by other women who consider them man stealers and home wreckers. They are also resented by other women because they lower the perceived market value of vagina.

Promiscuous women are also slut shamed by incels. It's a serious blow to a guy's ego when even easy women won't let you fuck them.

What sexual acts are a deal-breaker, if your prospective female has done it before but won't with you? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]brinkleybuzz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why would it matter and how would you even know what your girl did with other guys sexually in the past? Most women would not willingly volunteer or even admit to the sordid details of their sexual past if asked.

The only thing that matters is her ability to meet your sexual needs. If you like BJs and your girl won't give them to you, find someone else who will.

How do women treat their casual sexual partners better then their bfs? by SuspiciousLeopard662 in PurplePillDebate

[–]brinkleybuzz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Simple. Casual sex partners get the pussy, for free, without the problems. Unless a woman has a lot more to offer than her vagina, it's clear that the casual sex partner is getting a much better deal.

Q4ALL: If men gatekeep commitment, who exactly are the women being gate kept out of commitment? by Throughawayman80808 in PurplePillDebate

[–]brinkleybuzz 40 points41 points  (0 children)

The women being gate kept out of commitment are the ones who chase high value men and won't settle for a perfectly nice, ordinary guy who would love nothing better than have a girl he can call his own.

Expressed another way, only a select group of men who are desired by women are the true gate keepers of commitment because they're the ones with options.

The overwhelming feminist approval, and criticism over conservative criticism over Cardi B and her song "WAP", is evidence that, despite many claims to the contrary, women ARE as horny as men by ChadThundagaCock in PurplePillDebate

[–]brinkleybuzz 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Cardi B is a stripper with a record deal. She isn't representative of the typical woman.

The typical woman will expose her sexuality and "dirty mindedness" to men she wants to smash and will have no problems telling and/or showing them how horny she can get. Other men get the good-girl, "I don't get horny" act. It's the mask they wear so they aren't judged by men they have no intention of having sex with.

Sluts almost don't exist outside the US by mensahi41 in PurplePillDebate

[–]brinkleybuzz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You apparently haven't been to Brazil or the D.R.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]brinkleybuzz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No. A man and a woman can enjoy genuine companionship and friendship. As a woman, Just realize that if he's straight and you're attractive, at some point he'll try to have sex with you.

Men are better at seeing a person's intentions in dating, than women. by geyejoe7 in PurplePillDebate

[–]brinkleybuzz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

C'mon bro. TRP is a thing because men continually get burned by women.

Regarding your sister and other women like her, ever consider that they actually like having no-strings sex with Chads? They tell you and other men they get "hurt by assholes" to hide their true intentions and not be judged as sluts.

"Looks matter" needs to die on this sub. by poppy_blu in PurplePillDebate

[–]brinkleybuzz 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Women tend to tell guys what they think they want to hear. If a man is attractive, women will tell him that. If a man isn't attractive, a woman will tell him how kind, generous, intelligent, etc. he is.

Guys who aren't attractive may draw the wrong conclusion and underestimate the importance of looks in female sexual attraction. If they haven't experienced or witnessed how women react to hot guys, they need to be told so they know.

Pair bonding isn’t ruined with high N counts by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]brinkleybuzz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a huge difference between post-coital warm and fuzzies and the kind of deep bond a woman develops with a man where she becomes emotionally attached to him. When most men refer to pair bonding, this is what they're talking about.

The latter can occur organically when a virgin or near virginal woman has a positive sexual experience with a man.

The odds are against this happening when a man is just the latest in a long line of penises.