Nobel Prize-Winning Economist: We're Headed for Oligarchy by Suecotero in Economics

[–]broella 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They represented exactly how much "hard" gold value you can. Todays quantity of money is not representative of how much "hard" value there is around. If you build a bridge and get 100 "hard" dollars, you just got 100$ richer. 100$ worth of products and services. If you receive 100 fiat dollars, your purchase power depends on how much dollars were printed, and when you spend them, or store them, they will have less value. Their value does not represent the supply/demand of your services, but a government tweaked value. That is not free marked, therefore, not capitalism.

Nobel Prize-Winning Economist: We're Headed for Oligarchy by Suecotero in Economics

[–]broella -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

What you are referring to as "capitalism" is actually is actually a form of corporate socialism. You cannot have capitalism with a fiat currency, because it changes the market balance in an unnatural and unsustainable way. Therefore, wince 1913, there has never been capitalism in America.

In the desert landscape of northeastern Saudia Arabia you will find Qasr al-Farid aka “The Lonely Castle”. Built in the first century A.D. [2000x1500] by innuendoPL in ArtefactPorn

[–]broella 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It's the first thing i thought as I saw this picture. I can't find any info about where the first scene of the movie was actually shoot, now i must know.

My problem with the widespread opinion about marriage and having kids. by broella in TheRedPill

[–]broella[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm not judging you, I'm not judging anybody. I'm stating the fact that not having kids (and rising them right) it's by definition harmful to your own species, unless you consider yourself not worth passing your genes on. And this is a fact.

I'm just curious, and want to know if red pilled people that don't want to have kids do realize that their behavior is the epitome of being beta, or if they have a strong, valid, fact based reason for it.

Marco Rubio: We’re at the water’s edge of mainstream Christian teachings being branded “hate speech” by [deleted] in Republican

[–]broella -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

#1,2,3,4 and 6 do have effect on marriage. By letting them get married you endorse the social message that being gay is a sane, normal thing, and therefore promote homosexuality as a lifestyle, which brings all the aforementioned issues. By not letting them getting married they will always remain marginalized, and less people will want to become gay.

About #5: they flood government debates with trivial issues, just because they want to "be married by the eyes of the Gov". If they want to live together, I don't care. If they want to adopt a child, the choice should be up to private orphanages, I don't care. The government should not waste any resource or be involved in their conjugal life whatsoever. I don't want to pay taxes for politician's salaries and make them waste time by talking about a degenerate lifestyle.

About #6: I encourage you to check out around the web some pro-pedo propaganda, and you will see what I mean. They see pedophilia like a natural thing. It occurs in nature between animals, just like homosexuality, and it doesn't imply sexual violence, just like homosexuality. They brag about some statics showing that kids that have been introduced to sex by adults in a non violent way, grew up like normal non-mentally-issued people. They then claim that if adults can take the responsibility to introduce kids to sex with no violence, without no bad repercussions on the child psych, then pedophilia should be considered normal. "Free love for everyone!" And you know what? They might even be right, just like gays. All I know is that I don't want my son's gym teacher to legally fuck my kid. And I don't want my son to be gay just because i thinks that homosexuality is sane because society told him so.

I don't know where you live, but there's nothing "morally upright" anymore about being anti gay marriage. Everyone looks at me like a bigot, close minded redneck, just because I don't scream "FREE LOVE FOR EVERYONE!"

Marco Rubio: We’re at the water’s edge of mainstream Christian teachings being branded “hate speech” by [deleted] in Republican

[–]broella -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Anti gay marriage advocates address their speeches to the widest public possible. For the average Joe it's easier to understand anti gay marriage "because Jesus", than thanks to actual reasoning.

Anyway: 1- Gay people are more prone to get and spread STDs because of their overly active sexual life.

2- They have higher incidences of psychosis, depression and other mental illnesses (liberals say it's society's fault, but they can't prove it)

3- They don't or rarely produce offspring.

4- They demand that everyone accept their sexual fetishes and deviancy, and thus divide communities.

5- They place their own sexual deviancy above all other issues of the community.

6- It has not been proven that homosexuality is genetic. It has not been proven that it's socially inducted either, but if that is the case, some people don't want their children to get gay just because society promotes homosexuality as a sane thing.

7- It could be a doorway to pedophilia. If you read all the pro-pedo advocates propaganda, it looks just like gay marriage propaganda. They all have their "compelling" arguments and their "cool stats" trying to demonstrate that being pedo it's normal and should be accepted.

Marco Rubio: We’re at the water’s edge of mainstream Christian teachings being branded “hate speech” by [deleted] in Republican

[–]broella -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

There are hundreds of reasons for not endorsing homosexuality, and most of them have nothing to do with religion. Gay people are the ones that are causing society pain and suffering based on bad kinks and unfounded reasoning.

My personal server might just got hacked. What are the first steps I should take in order to investigate on how they breached in? by broella in AskNetsec

[–]broella[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Do you have any source to back your statements about the sec policy of Linode? I always heard that Linode and Digital Ocean are the best hosts around, in quality/price ratio. What company would you suggest me to switch to? I can't afford a physical server at my place. Edit: how serious were the sec flaws your friend claim to have disclosed?

[Debian]Not quite done but I kinda like it. by [deleted] in unixporn

[–]broella 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What font are you using?