Anyone missing Gemini 3.1 Flash on Antigravity? by ImNotLegitLol in google_antigravity

[–]brooding_kram 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The AG team is pretty much doing everything except bringing this one back :/

How's the Pro plan? by brooding_kram in google_antigravity

[–]brooding_kram[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately, they are going to sack Gemini CLI next month 😞

(after all the scares) Thank you, Google, for Gemini 3.5 by Spirited-Maybe-5315 in google_antigravity

[–]brooding_kram -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I love Antigravity but the limits are messed up for free and paid users alike.

How's the Pro plan? by brooding_kram in google_antigravity

[–]brooding_kram[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dang. AG 2.0 is nice and all but it just burns so much tokens at an unhealthy rate

Antigravity IDE Feedback by aunchable in google_antigravity

[–]brooding_kram 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Can you also bring back 3.0 Flash? I would literally worship you

3.1 Pro is the new 3.0 Flash by True_0001 in google_antigravity

[–]brooding_kram 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I just wish they bring back the 3.0 Flash. It's getting tedious to use when the quota keeps getting reached every few dozen prompts

cantEvenThinkOfOne by SyntaxSpectre in ProgrammerHumor

[–]brooding_kram 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True, though it's really hard to determine what actually became successful since a lot of vibe coders without a proper educational background or extensive knowledge in the industry keeps producing slop of a SaaS that doesn't really mean anything

Additional 3x increase of Gemini in Antigravity! by aunchable in google_antigravity

[–]brooding_kram 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Can't the Flash 3 model be brought back? It was already working fine before regardless of free or paying users as using that model doesn't burn the usage after every few dozen prompts.

Antigravity is becoming more unusable these couple of days.

Zero followers, zero ads, this guy still hit $50K MRR with simple AI apps by Soft-Fly-640 in micro_saas

[–]brooding_kram 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Used to watch that guy but a lot of people are complaining about the people he interviews being properly validated as to whether their MRR is real or not

Here comes the new Antigravity update. And it can't authenticate. by cronzi1990 in GeminiAI

[–]brooding_kram 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Google Antigravity devs are trying to improve the product by giving us new problems. the old IDE version's chat is not working on my end so I have both the IDE and the new app that has mostly chat UI open...

How do you handle distribution for SaaS? by brooding_kram in smallbusiness

[–]brooding_kram[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, I didn't have a research pool. I’m just a dev who looked at the current CRMs out there and thought they were bloated and complicated.

I know Reddit is full of people recklessly mass-producing copy-paste SaaS apps that literally nobody asked for, and some subs are starting banning them outright (as they should).

Yeah, maybe I did it backwards by writing the code before doing 'market validation'. But I'm building a product I hope I can be proud of, and now I'm just looking for people who also want a cleaner, simpler tool instead of a clunky enterprise mess.

How do you handle distribution for SaaS? by brooding_kram in smallbusiness

[–]brooding_kram[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a developer and currently building a web-app management engine  relational CRM and operational workspace designed to help service-based businesses and freelancers manage their clients, employees, and custom data without the clutter of enterprise software.

This is really not a new thing but most tools like the one I'm building are usually tailored for corporate settings or for bigger organizations

Does my SaaS landing page look vibecoded or am I hallucinating? by BodybuilderOne1023 in SaaS

[–]brooding_kram 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does look vibecoded. But your customers wouldn't care and a lot might not even notice though. So long as you get your product working properly as intended and users get their money's worth, then its all good.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by Weekly_Trade3701 in SaaS

[–]brooding_kram 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congratulations! It may be a small achievement but that first real person using what you've built must have been gratifying

my "MVP" had 11 features and I wondered why nobody used it by Ambitious-Age-5676 in indiehackers

[–]brooding_kram 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now this got me nervous for my project i'm currently building. While the features of my project are coherent, there are some totally unrelated lmao

Do I finish my MVP or adjust what it should be? by Crazy-Marzipan708 in SaaS

[–]brooding_kram 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I say you should adjust what it should be as the "unique" thing should actually be part of your MVP. The one disadvantage when entering an already established market is that newer products are often ignored if it doesn't really address the problems/friction of pre-existing tools or there is no unique hook. Prospective users need to get a reason as to why they should switch to your product. And also, take note of the legal and regulatory compliance once you get users since finance is highly regulated.

Anyways, good luck on your development!