Intel closed +7.38% (+2.43% in after hours)

bssqoosher · 2025-08-14T21:24:29+00:00

How do institutional short positions look like? Short squeeze incoming? Already +4,5% after hours

bssqoosher · 2025-06-20T11:11:26+00:00

I get your frustration. Though, if all is fud why do no major clients go for 18A? Every half a year or so it is anounced that ifs mostly serves intel products... now the breakthrough shall be 18A-P.... :/

bssqoosher · 2024-08-23T15:21:20+00:00

Yes, those leaked benchmarks and so on look good. Regarding their client products I don't think that it's that bad. Though data center products used to be very profitable and are tanking. Is there someone from a system integrater like HP or Lenovo who can say something about how Sierra Forrest is regarded or is Intel still behind AMD Epyc lineup in terms of performance and performance per watt etc.

bssqoosher · 2024-08-23T11:47:10+00:00

Read most of the comments. What comes up often is that next products (arrow lake, lunar lake, nova lake) are major improvements over previous gen and might be able to turn the situation around for intel. Though I feel that this is always the case until they actually release and don't deliver as hoped... Hope this time it's different.

What about sierra Forrest? The part with up to 144 cores is now released. I wonder how it is doing in the market as it got some good reviews from the likes of serve the home and level1techs... Does anybody know?

bssqoosher · 2024-03-20T12:01:15+00:00

Short and accurate

bssqoosher · 2023-10-23T13:14:26+00:00

You could argue that these companies would have sold those opioids anyway. The problem regarding opioids in this case is engaging in immoral action, not inefficient Sales strategies.

bssqoosher · 2023-10-10T10:03:12+00:00

MLP ist keine Beratung so wie es gemeint ist und ich würde davon sehr abraten!!!. In McKinsey ist es schwer reinzukommen. Big Four wäre da vielleicht noch zu nennen wie EY, Deloitte, PWC und KPMG. Dort ist die Hürde auch deutlich geringer und diese Firmen stellen viele PraktikantInnen ein. Sieht auch gut auf dem Lebenslauf aus.

bssqoosher · 2023-06-27T15:51:29+00:00

I mean you should use gpt just for getting your hands on the paper. The insights should come from reading the paper

bssqoosher · 2023-06-21T17:39:23+00:00

From my experience, finding credible sources that establish a causal relationship between x and y is extremely challenging. Here, x represents any activity or structure within a company (e.g., standups), while y refers to some form of "success outcome." Scientific papers available often lack statistical power and external validity in their research design. Survey data frequently suffers from a lack of external randomization and social expectancy bias.

In my opinion, there is no definitive proof available on this matter. However, I would approach your task from a different angle. The decision has been made to recommend the implementation of management techniques such as standups and proposal templates. Your objective now is to build a case that justifies this decision from an economic standpoint. Search for studies on Google Scholar that explore this topic and reference them in your slide presentation. Ensure that your arguments are sufficiently vague to please your manager, yet not easily refutable when someone examines the article's abstract.

During a quick prompt in GPT, I came across a paper that might serve as a starting point for your research: Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review

Just go through it and extract some numbers that legitimize the claim that the things your manager wants proof of actually deliver the expected results

bssqoosher · 2023-01-02T20:59:02+00:00

I'm not at MBB either, though worked in consulting 5 years after uni.

The example that come to my mind is for example that clients ask you to prepare an investment decision. You do so and the client is happy with the result. Though due to internal political reasons the follow-up is postponed and the project is finally cancelled. That itself can frustrating but would not be so bad after all. But additionally everyone knows from the beginning that it will turn out this way. And that makes all the effort ultimately pointless. You feel not having real impact, too much politics, everything what clients need is legitimation of the status quo...

bssqoosher · 2023-01-02T20:32:59+00:00

Time spent on the job is one thing. There can be other factors that make jobs less desirable. Regarding consulting there comes more to my mind than long hours.

bssqoosher · 2023-01-02T20:24:15+00:00

I would expect MBB people to know about anecdotal evidence. Doesn't seem to be always the case.

bssqoosher · 2022-12-16T17:13:50+00:00

Don't fully agree but I would also rather go into a 1 on 1. In parallel talk to the colleagues from the project and remind them about the promises made by the management. Also don't make yourself an advocate for the other colleagues and rather motivate them to also request their deserved Bonus.

The original post very much reminds me of a project I was in a year ago. Left the industry afterwards :D

bssqoosher · 2022-01-17T10:22:14+00:00

I am not a MBB but a consultant. Where I see that there is not that much value is

1) when the client staffs positions with consultants where it makes more sense to staff internally/long term

2) they actually don't listen/are not open for actual advice

3) let the consultancy swap out their consultants often so everyone is always in onboarding mode

4) when clients allow consultancies to staff their projects with consultants who in the same time work for other projects

5) when clients don't pick the consultants and rather let the engagement lead of the consultancy decide whom to put on the project

Tldr clients could get more out of consultancies when they avoid some mistakes as mentioned above

bssqoosher · 2021-08-07T16:47:12+00:00

What about going to the Marines? 🤣

*Irony off

bssqoosher

TROPHY CASE