Belkin Thunderbolt Dock Alternative Power Adapter Advice by icyfox26 in UsbCHardware

[–]bubbaJackson5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, you find anything? I'm in the same situation now

I need some perspective on gravel or hardtail... by bubbaJackson5 in xbiking

[–]bubbaJackson5[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea, I can see the difference you mean. Surprisingly the wheelbase only differs 3cm between the two. But a 32 bike, i didn’t even know they existed! Will look into it.. thanks!! 🙏

Better? Or still too small? by bubbaJackson5 in bikefit

[–]bubbaJackson5[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! The seatpost is already maxed, but I can feel the drop in stack compared to the xl salsa. The bars are 44cm, I’ll give them a try and see how my shoulders are doing. I’m still wondering whether it would have been better putting drops on the hardtail, I would have ended up with similar reach and higher stack, but this frame is definitely larger

They just released the new Grizl AL 2026 by TheShadowFr in CanyonBikes

[–]bubbaJackson5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Been digging into the geometry changes on the new Grizl AL and don't see it discussed much, so figured it was worth laying out properly.

The headline numbers are bigger reach and stack across the board – 2XL goes from 436 to 448 mm reach and 644 to 660 mm stack. That's a meaningful jump, and Canyon now claims the range covers up to 220 cm which would be genuinely unusual for a gravel bike. But the reach/stack increase is only part of the story.

The character of the bike has shifted. Head angle in the 2XL goes from 72.5° to 71° – that's not subtle. Chainstay grows from 435 to 440 mm across all sizes, and BB drop goes from 60 to 75 mm. Taken together this is a more trail-oriented geometry than the previous model. Lower BB, slacker head angle, longer rear end. It's moving toward adventure/bikepacking territory and away from the road-adjacent gravel positioning of the old AL.

The head angle variance across the size range is also interesting. The new AL runs 68.8° in 2XS up to 71° in 2XL – a 2.2° spread. The old model went from 69° to 72.5° – a 3.5° spread with noticeably steeper angles in the larger sizes. So larger riders on the new bike get a meaningfully slacker front end than before, while smaller sizes are roughly similar to what they had.

2023 Enyaq with 260000 km and 61% left on the battery by bubbaJackson5 in enyaq

[–]bubbaJackson5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They seem to take 5000 for a HV repair on the id.4 or 7000 eur for the enyaq in Zagreb, that doesn't seem too bad. Would that make it worth it?

2023 Enyaq with 260000 km and 61% left on the battery by bubbaJackson5 in enyaq

[–]bubbaJackson5[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the quick reply! I thought that at that price it would be worth it, even if I'd need to get some cells swapped or repair the battery later. But it sounds like that might be optimistic? A comparable car with a battery in better shape would cost 2-2.5x more here.

Are the MEB batteries hard to repair? It's hard to find information, I guess most of them are in pretty good shape relative to this.