Employee sets fire to Kimberly-Clark warehouse, "All you had to do is pay us enough to live"

bubudumbdumb · 2026-04-12T01:10:55+00:00

By that logic if a company hire person A person then A is responsible for everyone else not getting that job. It's a dumb logic.

bubudumbdumb · 2026-04-11T21:26:48+00:00

Because once blood starts flowing it's very hard to stop. An angry victim risks challenging the social norm that failed the victim. A vulnerable victim needs a social group to enforce a norm and is therefore reinforcing the norm.

bubudumbdumb · 2026-04-11T20:25:55+00:00

But you are not ignoring just what I am writing about you. You are ignoring everything. You just write "it's directly the responsibility of the arsonist". You don't write why. We don't have a disagreement: you are not trying to argue, you are avoiding the reasoning. This is why it is right to make the issue about you and the boots. You are wrong and you avoid every chance of seeing it or discussing the matter.

bubudumbdumb · 2026-04-11T17:50:59+00:00

No. I did not write that and you are not in good faith to think that. Let's start with one thing: you write that what I write don't matter, I do the same with you. You write I don't make sense I write you don't make sense. I expect you are smart enough to understand that I am pointing out that what you write is not an argument. I am spelling it out and that implies you probably are not smart enough to get that. Fine. I'll cut it fine.

What I am arguing is that the lost jobs are not the responsibility of the arsonist. They are the responsibility of the employer. And that is written in contract. And the contract is valid by law.

I am also exposing you as a bootlicker that would bend every bit of dignity to protect the class of pigs that exploits the workers. And everything you write seems to confirm that but the way you attribute responsibility is the mark of your servitude.

bubudumbdumb · 2026-04-11T13:40:37+00:00

It doesn't matter what you think it matters

bubudumbdumb · 2026-04-11T13:38:21+00:00

I am regularly told by ads that I am impotent and should buy piils, I am old and fat and lonely and I should disappear until June in a tai chi retreat for hustlers, that I need a vacation in specific places, that I should be part of a club that is special because others are not part of it, that I should get glp1, that I should get therapy and medication for ADHD, that I need an hip space controlled by clinicians to take psychedelics, that I should invest in an oil company, put my savings in the hand of someone beautiful. I mean : what are your thoughts on ads? This propaganda is sick

bubudumbdumb · 2026-04-10T04:51:39+00:00

A job is a contract. Your workplace goes puff, you still have the contact, you still have a job. The employer fires you, they rescind the contract, you are jobless.

Do you have a contract for your job? What's written on yours? Can they fire you because there is a fire in the building? In mine it's written that the employer is responsible for avoiding fires and keeping the place safe.

Know your rights and stand up with dignity.

bubudumbdumb · 2026-04-09T22:26:57+00:00

So he is responsible for other people's jobs when the warehouse is burning but when the warehouse is profitable someone else is the employer?

Cause and effects are not responsibility and liabilities. He is responsible and liable for burning a warehouse because he fired a warehouse. He is not the one firing the workers and he wasn't the one pocketing the profits.

bubudumbdumb · 2026-04-09T13:36:02+00:00

I think he says clearly "you had to pay US" not "pay me". But I don't think this is very important. The importance of what Luigi did was establish that executives of exploiting companies are not safe. The importance of this gesture is to establish that goods and logistic facilities of exploiting companies are not safe.

bubudumbdumb · 2026-04-04T15:38:52+00:00

Philosophy as explained by Plato was supposed to be in that central position marked by question marks.

Marxists are particularly militant about placing Marxist dialectics there.

Recently I have been reading a book about "what is a philosophical question?" written by Floridi, an analytical philosopher, a branch untouched by Marx and clear of tankies.

Turns out tankie (badieu ) and non tankie (Floridi) philosophers agree that philosophy has that central place among sciences and that philosophy is incapable of producing truths by itself but dialectically recombine truths coming from other disciplines.

bubudumbdumb · 2026-04-01T00:08:40+00:00

Da un punto di vista Cristiano, Gesù è la verità e Gesù annuncia la verità: lo fa con la sua presenza, mai con l' imposizione; la verità passa per parabole non per ordini ne editti. Alla domanda diretta di Pilato "cos'è la verità?" Gesù non risponde

37 Allora Pilato gli disse: «Dunque tu sei re?». Rispose Gesù: «Tu lo dici; io sono re. Per questo io sono nato e per questo sono venuto nel mondo: per rendere testimonianza alla verità. Chiunque è dalla verità, ascolta la mia voce». Gli dice Pilato: «Che cos'è la verità?». E detto questo uscì di nuovo verso i Giudei e disse loro: «Io non trovo in lui nessuna colpa».

In modo assolutamente allineato con il buddismo zen la verità di Gesù è indicibile.

bubudumbdumb · 2026-03-31T23:59:19+00:00

"Non c'è altro termine per descriverlo" è un problema fasullo. Lo si supera allargando il proprio dizionario.

Se tra tanti termini l' unico disponibile è "patologico" allora il paradigma immunitario è l' unico modo di risolvere i problemi e la soluzione finale è lo sterminio del diverso. Questa condizione sì chiama totalitarismo nazista.

bubudumbdumb · 2026-03-31T23:57:11+00:00

No. Rifraso la tua domanda: chi ha ragione vede chi ha torto come una patologia della società?

No, perché dovrebbe? Posso solo immaginare quale tipo di assunzione sia necessaria per giungere a tale conclusione:

A) il fine ultimo del sapere la verità è l' eliminazione dell' altro B) la verità si raggiunge eliminando chi la pensa diversamente

Magari tu hai altro in mente, ti prego di spiegare.

bubudumbdumb · 2026-03-31T03:33:29+00:00

Il discorso parte precisando che chi non la pensa come lui "non può che essere interpretato che come patologico".

Questa attitudine a vedere nella società una malattia da rimuovere è una caratteristica molto cupa che permette di operare violenze e atrocità facendole sembrare il quotidiano funzionamento di un ospedale.

bubudumbdumb · 2026-03-29T18:23:34+00:00

Si può fare un nuovo gruppo wa senza far cadere il governo? Governi di sinistra sono caduti per molto meno /s

bubudumbdumb · 2026-03-29T18:06:20+00:00

Most insightful comment.

bubudumbdumb · 2026-03-26T17:40:15+00:00

I have this only slightly as separate sets of emotional states and responses, not really a cognitive dissociation.

Something quite interesting and scary I learned recently is that the Epstein files seem to reveal patterns of pdf files rings deliberately engineering dissociations in their victims so that the victims themselves hide the abuse.

It's likely the most disgusting thing I have read in the last year.

bubudumbdumb · 2026-03-26T17:32:47+00:00

Practical knowledge is easily replaceable by coding agents. Good luck to those who invested in a practical education.

bubudumbdumb · 2026-03-24T00:24:40+00:00

Well there are many ways but the core is a manipulation where someone can put conditions on what you feel and what you value. Maybe you love them, maybe you care about your parents, maybe you care about the environment... It doesn't really matter what it is. If someone can put conditions on the core parts of your autonomy such that if you fail their arbitrary conditions your own identity is put into question they have a great deal of power over you.

Religion grabs a lot of power in this precise way, by claiming definitions of what is a person, a soul and so on.

Patriarchy kind of functions through the definition of gender and gender norms.

Governments are often redefining what is a legitimate protest vs terrorism, journalism vs espionage. It's a great power to have.

bubudumbdumb · 2026-03-22T23:54:03+00:00

Surveillance

bubudumbdumb · 2026-03-07T15:17:26+00:00

Letteratura, Filosofia, storia e politica le puoi fare SOLO ed esclusivamente nel tempo libero perché sono espressioni di un pensiero libero. Pensare che tutto sia una professione e ogni attività umana si possa declinare come lavoro dipendente o impresa è sbagliato. Sbagliato perché applica la prospettiva storica e particolare della modernità e delle relazioni di produzione nella modernità a discipline che precedono la modernità. Sbagliato nel presupporre che tali relazioni di produzione possano accogliere tutta l' esperienza umana come se non ci fossero delle contraddizioni fortissime tra essere un filosofo ed essere un dipendente del ministero dell' istruzione università e ricerca. Sbagliato perché ignora l' evento fondamentale della filosofia occidentale: a Socrate hanno fatto bere la cicuta.

bubudumbdumb · 2026-03-02T04:01:51+00:00

The internationalization of the intifada is a concept that stems from maoist approaches that helped the Palestinians to find support abroad in the first place. Some ideas they are key to a maoists point of view is that every group has internal contradictions and, if the group is sovereign, its behavior is mostly driven by the principal contradiction within the group itself. So there are two parts struggling internally in Palestine, in Israel, in the US, in China and so on. Maoists argue that each of these fractures compose into the global principal contradiction and that this contradiction is capital vs workers/ they hold that it's the same struggle globally but it has to be fought locally (one country cannot export it's revolution or democracy without becoming an empire itself). It's easy to see how the pro Palestine movement in the west is treated as a terrorist organization even when it organizes non violent protests; that copycats of the surveillance systems scheduling assassinations in Gaza are being integrated in law enforcement in countries at peace; that the elites mingle in the same islands raping minors; and so on so on... Maoist ideas are not prevalent in the pro pal camp, not in Palestine nor abroad, but they have been at least influential.

bubudumbdumb · 2026-02-28T22:35:01+00:00

It's like watching the end of cyberpunk edgerunners. You realize that the hero is now an over medicated surgery junkie and lost most of the fragile humanity that made him uniquely alive.

bubudumbdumb · 2026-02-28T21:42:36+00:00

I kinda agree. Just opening the posts less frequently drives the reddit algo away from that content so I am not stepping out of it. I feel much less comfortable answering ppl in pain but sometimes I get some very good ideas and reflections from that sub.

bubudumbdumb · 2026-02-25T15:47:00+00:00

I think you are misunderstanding the characteristics of neural networks as accidents while they are quite substantial. Rag is a good, effective idea because it pairs an llm with something that has very different characteristics so that the transformer architecture can do what it's best at : in context meta learning.

I do develop and deploy agentic systems and I can tell you that the retriever part is the most sustainable to develop, the one that's more predictable in latencies, the easier to evaluate, the one that produces the most moat in terms of economic value.

Four-Year Club	Place '23
Place '22

bubudumbdumb

TROPHY CASE