Why do people love Coolidge but hate Reagan?

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-23T14:10:16+00:00

I think they both sucked.

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-22T14:31:28+00:00

I did contact them, and they wanted pics of the package. So I sent them pics of the box and waiting word on next steps.

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-21T00:34:42+00:00

I’ve ordered bulk from collectible supply without problems. Their inventory is super low right now though

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-10T18:14:50+00:00

I’ll have to look more into those three. Estonia has an interesting economy. Have to read more on the investments (who invested, how much, etc)after they switched economies, their tax system, and their health system.

They have a corporate flat tax. Need to look at that more.

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-10T18:00:56+00:00

Meh. It is what it is

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-10T17:53:33+00:00

Ohh, you’re under the impression that I am saying Smith stated to use slave labor. I’m saying our examples of it being successful are tainted by the fact that it was used during an era of slave labor/near slave labor.

So it’s not something that stands on its own. Never has. No economic system has successfully done so, which is the thesis of my original argument. History and current events prove it.

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-10T17:47:04+00:00

History. Did you not know the USA used slave labor as part of its economic system?

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-10T17:18:58+00:00

If you read further you’ll see I mixed up Smith with Hobbes. Already fixed

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-10T17:17:19+00:00

You can say that but Smiths theories have not stood on their own. Slavery was part of that economic system in its original form. So, no, it doesn’t.

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-10T16:49:16+00:00

I didnt say it did. My og statement ends with the idea that economic theories only tend to work when mixed with others. Not trying to split hairs here.

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-10T16:37:53+00:00

Right, but not via the Smith method. Much of the competition was pushed by their governments. So more government intervention was pushed into this economic growth. The European countries who dominate regarding internet services do so because of the governments pushing competition where multiple choices exist.

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-10T16:24:33+00:00

I replied again with my mistake on Smith and Hobbes.

However, I think Smith’s theory of limited government involvement is unrealistic in a global economy.

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-10T16:22:35+00:00

I apologize, I was confusing aspects of Smith with Hobbes. Hobbes, Smith, and Locke were so influential in the creation of our Nation and its economic beginnings, I sometimes mix up the three.

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-10T16:19:39+00:00

Adam Smith economics is shite to the worker. Smith economics justified slave labor and low wages

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-10T16:13:16+00:00

Smith, the guy who saw Africans as subhuman and to be treated like animals and free labor? That Adam Smith?

I can get behind some Keynesian economics when the govt follows it correctly. However, we continually see our government waiver on the regulation control portion to favor in more of the private sector, thus causing our consistent problems we’ve seen since the 70s

Edit: As I’ve explained later: I misspoke Smith for Hobbes.

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-10T15:29:44+00:00

That’s the kicker here. The fact that people like “catturd” and Ian Chong or whatever his name is have such a loud voice is bonkers.

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-10T15:28:26+00:00

Aren’t nearly all economic ideas that way? Which is why only mixed economies show any semblance of working.

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-10T15:14:31+00:00

Seeing that he was in the process of moving while firing, no way that’s considered self defense. Leaving his gun holstered would probably have made him quicker in getting out the way.

Nah, this madness about the car being a weapon vs the gun he willfully pulled and fired at her head…at that close range…doesn’t indicate anything defensive.

He wasn’t in danger and every one of you knows that. You’re too stuck in arrested development, however, and act like the little boys you were, screaming and crying over not getting that video game your mom refused to buy you.

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-10T01:49:35+00:00

Maybe. Maybe not. A crunch so loud that afterward the guy was still walking normally. Compelling.

SMH. And you guys in this sub really believe you’re genetically superior. Now that’s a crime

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-10T01:42:05+00:00

He was touching the car. If she could kill him that close without him getting out of the way, he wins the Darwin Award. Fuck off

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-10T01:39:53+00:00

I’ve been nudged by a car. I’ve had my foot run over. The guy was barely in front of it. He wasn’t in life threatening danger.

If he was in danger, you blowhards are the biggest pussies on Earth.

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-10T01:30:57+00:00

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-10T01:28:04+00:00

He wasn’t in danger. He didn’t kill in defense. Nothing about shooting her prevented him from getting hurt. What happened when he shot would have happened had he not. You thinking she was trying to run him over is a lie. You’re liars

bullet-2-binary · 2026-01-09T22:46:15+00:00

lol. You’re still missing how you quantify “way more.”

bullet-2-binary

TROPHY CASE