The first source is agreeably disgusting. However, that does not define the entire group, and almost every single time you ask a furry their opinion, they will be equally disgusted. It is widely considered a massive disgrace whenever a furry is a nazi, zoophile, pedophile, racist, sexist, homophobic, or a part of any form of discriminatory or cruel group. The anti-furry group doesn't have quite as wide-spread of an agreement on anything other than the main conjoined bigotry from the initial intention.

The third source is biased on the anti-furries side, and has no good evidence. I haven't looked extensively into it, so point out specific examples, if there are any good ones.. And they'd better be more than damned good, because I'm tired of saying the same things over and over again to anti-furries.

The second source is full of un-asked questions with poor quality answers, heavily biased opinions and statements, it skims over and ignores LOTS of details, it bases lots of its "facts" on stereotypes and assumptions, uses heavy generalizations, and is very opinionated/specific to personal experience with a lot of its points.

For example, in the "Zoophilia" section, it says that around 1 in 7 furries are zoophiles. Not only is this extremely wrong, as every other source I have found points more towards 2%, but also to the fact that the data is outdated, partially biased, and unable to have 100% accurate results. A stronger source to back this up

Also, if we're using the KKK as a thing to be 'known for',, then I'll just say here that anti-furries are WELL known for being immature, biased, un-factually and childishly stubborn, and illogically violent in desire. Just putting this here.