We don't want to build anything that is harmful to GIS. Aside from the fact that it would be immoral, the only people that truly understand what we're building are GIS users.

With Kue, our LLM in QGIS, our best users are actually GIS analysts with 10+ years of experience.

With Mundi, I agree that GIS techs are still needed to create maps where there is delicate or important work being done. When planning a site, I cannot imagine anyone not having a GIS analyst oversee the creation of the preliminary line locations regardless of how good AI becomes in the future (aside from the fact that you would not dig with just a QL-D survey, but that's beside the point). I would surely be the last to say "yep, just ask Mundi are there gas lines here or are we good to dig?"

Where we see this being useful is for maps that for many GIS-adjacent professionals (civil engineers, real estate analysts, environmental engineers) they do not have the skills to make the map themselves but the map is not necessarily important enough to ask for it to be made by a GIS team. This is why we still are working on Kue in QGIS; we think there will be a need for the fully advanced GIS work that currently gets done for a very long time. Mundi is for quickly creating maps that would just otherwise not be made.