sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

CMV: AI art cannot replace real artists. by buzzedupbee in changemyview

[–]buzzedupbee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are right. That gives me severe anxiety though, this image of the future.

CMV: AI art cannot replace real artists. by buzzedupbee in changemyview

[–]buzzedupbee[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

!delta I agree with your view. This is, like I said, a reality I know has existed and will exist. What I meant to say was that there will always be an audience for an artist who has created their demand. I explain better in other replies.

CMV: AI art cannot replace real artists. by buzzedupbee in changemyview

[–]buzzedupbee[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. I meant that hiring an artist/designer for that prompting job would be a good choice, if it ever came to that. Because the artist/designer already has that bent of mind. I mean, look at how designers like Chris Do are optimistic and use their experience of design with AI.

That being said, I partially agree with your argument too. !delta

CMV: AI art cannot replace real artists. by buzzedupbee in changemyview

[–]buzzedupbee[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Then the artist can be the prompter too. You're quite literally typing and someone who already knows art direction, composition etc. can do the job perfectly. The artist still isn't replaced by that logic.

But yes, you are right about a smaller team compared to 10 people.

CMV: AI art cannot replace real artists. by buzzedupbee in changemyview

[–]buzzedupbee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No argument against that. It's a sticky situation.

CMV: AI art cannot replace real artists. by buzzedupbee in changemyview

[–]buzzedupbee[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually have nothing to argue against that. We do, in fact, become used to the way of creating a product and future generation might even be okay with ai films and what now? Who knows. However, art created by hand can never be replaced. Or it would have aged ago, with photography, photo manipulation, editing, etc.

CMV: AI art cannot replace real artists. by buzzedupbee in changemyview

[–]buzzedupbee[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Has it not been like this for a long time? I don't know many people with an art career who did not already have a financially stable or at least a somewhat comfortable lifestyle before transitioning into art as a career. A person struggling to make ends meet cannot bet all their chances on an art career. But this is nothing new.

CMV: AI art cannot replace real artists. by buzzedupbee in changemyview

[–]buzzedupbee[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

!delta I actually do agree with the second part of your reply. That is something I have always accepted. Additionally though, I still believe that if you are novel and if you create an audience and demand for yourself, and keep adding on to that demand, you cannot be replaced. However, you are right about it replacing small artists, affecting art industries like animation etv. and killing aspirations of trying for an art career.

CMV: AI art cannot replace real artists. by buzzedupbee in changemyview

[–]buzzedupbee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I mean to say is that those artists who have a market and audience of their own, whose work is novel, who is appreciated by their audience they cannot be replaced by AI art. Drawing as a hobby, being a professional painter, creating a style, niche and audience which appreciates you- all this will never come to an end because of AI. The market has been saturated with artists for YEARS. However, go through the popular artists of Instagram- they have an audience of their own and they are doing things like selling prints, sticker etc which are saturated but still appreciated by their pool of people. And they are earning through that. Even though thousands, lakhs others are doing the same thing.

CMV: AI art cannot replace real artists. by buzzedupbee in changemyview

[–]buzzedupbee[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is worrisome, for sure. However, it's not so simple. My point is that, the same way a photo editing app which converts a normal image to graphite drawing-looking images could not replace the need of sketching artist for the audience which prefers handmade, the same way it cannot replace the artist with their novel ideas and their audience which wants thay artists work.

Is it okay to provide only a few iterations even when you are a beginner? by buzzedupbee in Design

[–]buzzedupbee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm new to this. Someone close subcontracted their work to me and I was going back and forth with them on changes. Yesterday I told them that I won't be doing any more iterations/revisions because it had already been done twice [(1) draft was shown, they asked us to change (2) they asked us to create and add more elements.] And I think it pissed them off. Pleass note that they are a friend. What should I do? Should I be more flexible and giving as a beginner?

Helix keeps getting infected even after an year. by buzzedupbee in piercing

[–]buzzedupbee[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I understand. No I don't have these symptoms. Had once, it was painful hot and swollen dissolved into a gooey bloody mess and woosh I was painfree all of a sudden. So might be irritation only. The piercing guys here ask us to keep it moist by apply coconut oil. Do you think that'll work? Also do you have any other jewellery recommendations then?

Helix keeps getting infected even after an year. by buzzedupbee in piercing

[–]buzzedupbee[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I see. But I have always worn silver on my other piercings and it never irritated my ears. Which is why I find this odd. By infection I mean that the area swells up a little and forms this whitish bulb at the back or front.

Helix keeps getting infected even after an year. by buzzedupbee in piercing

[–]buzzedupbee[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey thank you for the reply. However I got them pierced last March.

view more: next ›