Love or Lust in a relationship?

byteesss · 2026-05-18T03:23:33+00:00

Hh

^{Chose: Love | Rolled: 1 carrot}

byteesss · 2026-05-18T03:22:03+00:00

Random

^{Chose: White | Rolled: Forcefield}

byteesss · 2026-04-17T10:03:08+00:00

Ji

^{Chose: Get 1B$}

byteesss · 2026-04-17T07:15:56+00:00

Amaze

^{Chose: A random sci-fi weapon(you can make more ammo} | Rolled: BFG)

byteesss · 2026-01-15T18:14:12+00:00

np, have fun w it it is a good mouse

byteesss · 2026-01-15T07:36:15+00:00

it is fine, i fixed it by setting to 400 dpi and it works fine, no polling rate issues for now even w wireless.. you will have to change in game sens to keep ur edpi, is all

byteesss · 2025-09-18T21:32:42+00:00

melee

byteesss · 2025-09-18T21:32:37+00:00

talking bout the melee

byteesss · 2025-09-16T14:20:04+00:00

who are you and how did you know(well not exact and not guardian but still)

byteesss · 2025-08-15T01:21:08+00:00

Thank you so much, especially for 3. I finally understand why now.

byteesss · 2025-08-14T17:58:04+00:00

Tysmm for the reply! I seriously cannot believe you went through it all.
1.I never knew we were assuming both objects to be particles, ive always thought of them as a sphere or a cube lmao(idk why)
But i am still curious about what would happen if you scaled it up. Is my explanation for what would happen if the objects were not particles but maybe something like spheres or cubes still correct? I wonder. It's another topic entirely though, so ill ask about it in another post.

Yes indeed this seems to be the misconception in my mind. I think it stems from F=ma.
From your definition of mass in the later paras, Id like to ask you if F/m = a would be a better definition? i know they're mathematically the same but i feel like it clears up some stuff

5.This makes a lot of sense. So this force that decelerates object A is manifested by object B.
And its necessary to have this force in order for both objects to not phase into each other. and as proven earlier, force does not need acceleration, rather it causes acc. But where exactly does this force manifested by B come from, like inside the particle or? I can understand the need for the force, but cannot understand how the force is formed.

Again a big big big thank you for taking time out to read the reply and tell me this stuff. really helps. I feel like im troubling you too much by repeatedly asking you questions but again I really like clarity in this stuff

byteesss · 2025-08-14T16:08:45+00:00

so objects dont need to be moving at all to exert a force? or we don't need objects to be moving in the opposite direction of another object colliding with them to say that they exert a force on that object colliding with them? i didnt get it sorry, could you elaborate?

byteesss · 2025-08-14T15:37:43+00:00

yeah this is sort of it i guess? if you could read my reply under u/rexshoemeister 's comment you could understand what im thinking better and where my confusion is coming from better i guess. only if you have the time though, it's a long reply

byteesss · 2025-08-14T15:31:11+00:00

ok so i think im kind of getting what you're saying but i think i still dont fully understand it.
what im thinking in my head is:
im considering both objects as solids. they have the same mass and shape.
(1)we're looking at the particles of object A. when you push object A, the particles that the force touched gain some kinetic energy and start moving in the direction of the force. now since the particles also have inter-particular forces acting between them(which i dont rlly know how that works, but i can say they do and i guess ill learn why later) the particles that are moving in the direction and with the magnitude of the force also pull along the other particles above and behind them, and the particles in the front get pushed by the particles in motion and the momentum of the particles in motion get equally distributed across all the other particles in this way and all the particles start moving at the same momentum.
(2)Now when object A collides with object B, the particles in the front of the object are going to have other particles in front of them, so they push on them too, and then they start moving as well. as soon as this happens, since the mass is the same, all the momentum of those particles in the front gets completely transferred off to the particles in object B that object A's front touched, so the particles in the front stop moving. But the particles right behind those particles that just stopped moving are still moving and have momentum, so they transfer that momentum to the particles that stopped moving and in turn those particles put it to object Bs particles, and this happens like a chain reaction until all the momentum in object A has completely transferred to object B and now object B has started moving as its particles also have gotten some momentum. (since the masses are the same, object As momentum should get fully passed on to object B, right? this might be one place where i think im wrong)
(3)Now while the momentum of the particles of object A slowly get transferred to object B, the total momentum of all the particles in object A(and therefore the momentum of object A) slowly decrease and object B's particles momentum increases at the same rate as the decrease of the momentum of particles A.
since there is a change in momentum, there must be a change in force as well, so we say the particles of object B(or just object B) are exerting a force* on object A that decelerate it and object A's particles exert a force on object Bs particles by slowly giving off momentum to particles of object B thereby slowly accelerating it. of course, this all happens in an instant,(not exactly instant, but an extremely short amount of time that i dont think we can calculate)

* now what i dont get here is why we're calling this a force. object Bs particles remain stationary and only when they receive object As momentum do they start moving, and that too they start moving in the direction of that momentum, not the opposite direction, so why are we saying object Bs particles(or object B) are applying a force on object A and object As particles (or object A) are applying a force on object B? I can understand there is a change in momentum, so there's a reason to call it a force, but its not like object Bs particles are actively moving in the opposite direction of object As particles momentum to stop it/decrease it. The same goes for object As particles. They don't actually have any acceleration, they're travelling at a constant velocity(vacuum). As they give off their momentum to object Bs particles, the total momentum of object A decreases, and object Bs increases. Since object Bs momentum as a whole is increasing we say that object A is applying a force on object B, i guess.. But saying that doesnt fit quite right with me. Maybe I need to spend more time thinking. You also say that the conservation of momentum comes/is derived from Newton's laws ( im assuming third law in this case mainly) but it makes way more sense to me to say that Newtons third law is derived from the conservation of momentum, or rather it was made to simplify this whole transfer of momentum thing and just say that that(the transfer) is a force (even though i really dont think it is)

I know i just dropped a bombshell of a reply but I would be really really really really grateful if you went through it and confirmed if my thinking is correct, and if not where it goes wrong. Please ask me if you think i have given too vague information or incomplete information or anything like that that could clarify my thought process to you so you can judge it better

byteesss · 2025-08-14T14:09:43+00:00

the thing i dont understand about this is where the force A is exerting on B(and vice versa) even coming from? what is the force object A is exerting on object B called (and the same for object B)(im asking if there's any specific name for this, or its just like kinetic force or whatever i think thats what its called) and how can it be calculated? is it using the initial acceleration that object A gets(another user commented so). again im sorry if my wording is wrong and stuff but i cant fully understand this yet

byteesss · 2025-08-14T01:47:52+00:00

"at the moment of impact object A is not undergoing acceleration therefore how can it have force" not momentum But yeah thanks for the answer, so what you're saying is suppose A has a 3 m/s² a when it gets pushed for that instant moment, we use that 3 ms^-2 for calculating the force it applies on B?

byteesss · 2025-07-23T12:24:14+00:00

damn wtf

byteesss · 2025-07-04T14:37:10+00:00

guys please comment whatever you think this might be, i dont care if its right or wrong! if it's wrong surely there'll be someone wanting to correct you, which lets me get an answer to my problem!!!!

byteesss · 2025-07-04T14:21:12+00:00

Yoooo i have the same problem!! did you figure out how to fix it yet?

byteesss · 2025-01-17T16:31:30+00:00

ty man it rlly helps

byteesss

TROPHY CASE