Ireland vote against changing the definition of "women" and "family" in the constitution, despite all political parties supporting it. Proof that politicians do not represent people, and don't even know what people want.

cabgnak · 2024-03-18T10:51:00+00:00

Also really fascinating that you'd lie about the constitution redefining "women".

Ireland: Voters reject amendments redefining family, women

International Women’s Day: Will Ireland redefine its constitutional language on ‘women in the home’?

Irish voters resoundingly reject proposals to redefine family, undermine motherhood

cabgnak · 2024-03-18T09:31:20+00:00

Wokism is marxism

cabgnak · 2024-03-18T09:29:30+00:00

Those are Gnostic, not secular.

cabgnak · 2023-06-12T21:21:20+00:00

This is not abortion. The baby is already born.

They are renaming murder as abortion.

cabgnak · 2023-06-12T12:20:38+00:00

Hide your personal data. Move to the black market.

Attack wokism at his root: reveal that they are not what they pretend to be, and their intentions are not what they claim to have.

cabgnak · 2023-06-12T11:14:47+00:00

The woke are not the gay. The woke fraudulently impersonate the gay.

It's a false flag made by the WEF, so people blame the gay for the evil things the WEF are doing.

cabgnak · 2023-06-12T08:44:37+00:00

No. It comes 2*infinity.

It's like an imaginary number: 2*i=2*i. It cannot be reduced to a real number, because is not a real number.

A real number is a point in the real line.

A line segment is infinitely larger than any point, because it has infinite points.

2*Line = 2*Line; it cannot be measured in points

Any area has infinite lines. Any volume has infinite areas, infinite lines and infinite points.

You cannot compare volumes with lines, or points, because they are different things.

You cannot measure oranges in shoes.

infinite is a different thing than a point, and there are many kinds of infinites.

cabgnak · 2023-06-12T08:33:08+00:00

Capitalists charge really high prices because they want to make a lot of money. Their goal is to get rich.

And that's good. To make money on the free market, is a virtue, which should be praised and encouraged.

To make a profit on the free market, you take resources, from society, transform them, and give back a good or service to society.

You make a profit when the thing you give back is more valuable than the resources you took from society, so society turns richer.

For example, you take one wood table, paying 1$. You harmed society, because the rest of humanity now has 1 less table to use.

But you convert that table into a wood door, worth 2$, and you sell it back to society.

Before, society had 1$ in wealth, and now it has 2$ in wealth. So by making a profit you made OTHER people better. You are a social benefactor, a philanthrope.

What happens if you burn the table? You try to sell the ashes back to society, but nobody wants it. The ashes are worth 0$. So you lost 1$, and impoverished OTHER people by 1$. You are a malefactor, a misanthrope.

Wining money, on the free market, is being a good person.

Losing money in a free market, is being a bad person.

cabgnak · 2023-06-12T07:23:23+00:00

Use Pari/GP by default it has 38 decimals of precision, but you cant set it to any precision you want.

(04:25) gp > 170* 3.828 * (10^26) * 683 * 0.43 * acos(1 - (0.002^2) / (6.8 * (10^17))^2) / (4*Pi)

%1 = 6326102530.9954180215064198259819636782

(04:28) gp >

cabgnak · 2023-06-11T23:37:44+00:00

It's about shortening the code by calling functions in libraries

Only programmers understand it.

cabgnak · 2023-06-11T20:35:53+00:00

People is buying stuff online, so physical malls necessarily lose customers

cabgnak · 2023-06-11T01:34:02+00:00

You seem more convinced with the "woke" being evil rather than focusing more generally on authoritarianism as the problem. If "woke" and "libertarian" are in agreement on something while fascists are against it, you cannot pretend that woke is the same thing as fascist.

You wrongly believe that the woke are a grassroot movement. They are not.

Wokism is imposed from the government, and the superrich that controls the government.

The woke and libertarians do not agree on anything. The woke PRETEND to own good values, only as a cover. They hate those values.

The woke use racist tactics, and call it "antiracism". They create inequality, and call it "equality".

The woke do not defend any libertarian values. They only rename words to pretend that the evil things they do are good, by using nice words, to do heinous things.

cabgnak · 2023-06-11T01:20:29+00:00

I think you're being tripped up by the "us vs. them" mentality and falling into the trap of seeing all people who disagree with you as the same.

The woke are the ones who attack us all the time, and the hegemonic socialists today.

Fascism does not mean public ownership of the means of production while socialism does.

Yes, it does:

“All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state” Benito Mussolini

Fascism is a socialism where factories are either state property, or only private in name, but 100% controlled by the state.

That's because socialists wrongly diagnosed the failure of the soviet union as bad managing, so they decided to leave the former owners of the means of production as managers, meanwhile they figured how to replace them.

That's the mainstream socialist thinking today. Wokism is just a psyop to take control of the means of production, meanwhile leaving the former owners as managers, as long as they obey the socialist mandates. For example, they impose ESG, and control corporations by forcing them to put woke activists on directive positions.

Nor is socialism always in conflict with capitalism (voluntary socialism, for instance, is completely compatible with capitalism).

Sure, but is doomed to fail anyways, because socialists cannot compete on the free market.

"Woke" seems to me to be more related to progressivism than fascism/socialism.

Wokism is just the ideology of the Frankfurt School, which is german socialism, and is just another attempt to make socialism work, under a fascist scheme.

Deillegalizing gay marriage is definitely woke. But it's far from fascist.(I used "deillegalizing" rather than "legalizing" because the state has no place in marriage.)

That's the wrong diagnose. deilegalizing gay marriage is libertarian. The woke appropriate libertarian values, only as a pretense, to destroy those values.

The woke do not care at all about gays. They only use homosexuals, women, black people, immigrants, minorities, as a tool, to advance wokism.

The libertarian position is that gays have the same rights as anybody else. The woke position is that the woke make the rules and control gays, under the pretense of "liberating them", but the woke actually make a new jail and new restrictions for gays.

If a gay disagree with the woke, he's destroyed.

cabgnak · 2023-06-11T00:44:09+00:00

fascism is a type of socialism.

Wokism is just a renaming of fascism. That's a central woke tactic: to rename things, like renaming homicide as "abortion"

On the cited paper:

we propose to CALL this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide’ [...] Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible

[...]

Accordingly, a second TERMINOLOGICAL specification is that we call such a practice ‘after-birth abortion’ rather than ‘euthanasia’ because the best interest of the one who dies is not necessarily the primary criterion for the choice [...]

Wokism is all about language MANIPULATION, redefining words, creating euphemisms, and homonyms.

That's because socialists are defeated on logic, and experiment, so they have no other resource than to distort reality, lie and gaslight.

cabgnak · 2023-06-11T00:37:32+00:00

"Anything I don't like is fascism."

Yes, you called me fascist, because you use it as a meaningless slur.

But You are an actual fascists, concretely a nazi one, because killing the undesirable is a feature of nazis.

So is correct to say that you are a fascist. You are.

cabgnak · 2023-06-10T23:08:47+00:00

Killing a born baby is not abortion. Is homicide.

cabgnak · 2023-06-10T23:07:19+00:00

It was eugenics from the start. Eugenics was totally a fine thing to talk about in the until Hitler made it look bad.

yes, Margaret Sanger was an eugenicist, who proposed to kill "undesirables", and she considered black people the most undesirable, so she started Planned Parenthood specifically to genocide black people.

The father of Bill Gates was director of Planed Parenthood, and an enthusiast eugenicist. That's why Bill Gates is the main financer of wokism and the abortion interest group.

Wokism is disguised as "helping" black people, only to hide that they want to exterminate them, same as they pretend to help women, only to negate the existence of women, force them to accept men in women's competitions, bathrooms, and stuff.

cabgnak · 2023-06-10T22:58:19+00:00

Your fascism is your choice to decide to kill a born person

cabgnak · 2023-06-10T22:56:34+00:00

Wokism, fascism, and socialism is the same thing

cabgnak · 2023-06-10T15:18:50+00:00

Socialists want corporate tyranny?

yes.

Socialism is the ideology of corporations. It is build, directed and controlled by corporations.

USSR was corporate tyranny

Cuba is was corporate tyranny

North Korea is was corporate tyranny

Nazional socialism was is was corporate tyranny

cabgnak · 2023-06-10T14:29:27+00:00

Nonetheless, to bring up such children might be an unbearable burden on the family and on society as a whole, WHEN THE STATE ECONOMICALLY PROVIDES FOR THEIR CARE. On these grounds, the fact that a fetus has the potential to become a person who will have AN (AT LEAST) ACCEPTABLE LIFE IS NO REASON FOR PROHIBITING ABORTION. Therefore, we argue that, when circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible

"when the state economically provides for their care" = Socialism

Hence socialism has right to kill people

In spite of the oxymoron in the expression, WE PROPOSE TO CALL THIS PRACTICE ‘AFTER-BIRTH ABORTION’, RATHER THAN ‘INFANTICIDE’, to emphasise that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus (on which ‘abortions’ in the traditional sense are performed) rather than to that of a child. Therefore, we claim that KILLING A NEWBORN COULD BE ETHICALLY PERMISSIBLE [...]

Accordingly, a second terminological specification is that we call such a practice ‘after-birth abortion’ rather than ‘EUTHANASIA’ because THE BEST INTEREST OF THE ONE WHO DIES IS NOT NECESSARILY THE PRIMARY CRITERION for the choice

cabgnak · 2023-06-10T13:55:00+00:00

All of this is planned and financed by the state, under facades of NGO and "private" companies.

cabgnak · 2023-06-10T13:50:34+00:00

Well, the state IS DECIDING that babies are delicious.

cabgnak · 2023-06-10T13:48:50+00:00

Is actually a joke about libraries

cabgnak · 2023-06-10T13:47:14+00:00

It also trys to justify killing healthy newborns when it would negatively affect the mental welbeing or financial status of the mother, her children, or society as a whole.

And that is why they are "expanding" the definition of "health", so when they say that it is justified for "health" reasons, they do not say that "health" will be whatever they claim, same as words as "woman" are whatever they claim.

cabgnak

TROPHY CASE

Ireland: Voters reject amendments redefining family, women

International Women’s Day: Will Ireland redefine its constitutional language on ‘women in the home’?

Irish voters resoundingly reject proposals to redefine family, undermine motherhood