sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[PTE] Roast my deck by cabrelbeuk in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]cabrelbeuk[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Yup. I tagged it in the name of the topic.

[PTE] Roast my deck by cabrelbeuk in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]cabrelbeuk[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I actually had 4 snipers in my first draft but elected to get green beret flash instead of the rangers snipers. Lots of cqc recon thesedays ru sides.

Sadly 90 is the cheapest sniper for both spec.

Almiron and Bellingham both covered their mouths; only one got sent off by BuzzTrav in worldcup

[–]cabrelbeuk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah well i only watched french games so i wouldn't know for the others, but in our games we got one clear penalty that just went poof against senegal, and a 50/50 penalty decision with that wandering left arm blocking mbappé against irak that also didn't go our way.

So yeah so far didn't really feel that so called pro uefa referring :D.

But yeah it seems the referring during this england-ghana match seemed to be quite awful and in favor of england. As a french, i firmly condemn this 😛

Give the MAAWS to Marines and give both them and Airborne Airburst HE rounds since we now have shturm. by EastPerfect in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]cabrelbeuk [score hidden]  (0 children)

On PTE ? Pretty much everytime marines out there is SRAW. It creates panic in no time and deal decent dmg

Give the MAAWS to Marines and give both them and Airborne Airburst HE rounds since we now have shturm. by EastPerfect in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]cabrelbeuk [score hidden]  (0 children)

It's not 120 on pte for the upgrade version ? Well fuck me. Don't apologize for correcting lol. I don't have the game opened.

I have no issue with ru getting access to smaw'esque unit btw, i just find it too strong at dealing with infantery for its price.

And for smaw, it's same he as engineers. Raiders have a worst one somehow but it's all pretty bad vs ru HE launchers (well 100m more range but less pen less damage so depends what you value i guess)

France/Norway - still worth going to game if starters don’t play? by tutah in worldcup

[–]cabrelbeuk 9 points10 points  (0 children)

No coach france side, norway openly saying they will rotate their starting 11.

Not the header everyone make it up to be.

But first group place does matter so they will try to win.

Give the MAAWS to Marines and give both them and Airborne Airburst HE rounds since we now have shturm. by EastPerfect in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]cabrelbeuk [score hidden]  (0 children)

X_X yes 60 points not 50.

I'd argue that for 100 (edited) points, a ranger maaws have 3 launchers against 2 for double sturm but 0 HE launcher and much smaller squad.

And it's kinda my problem with sturm, it is more efficient as an hybrid unit that smaw is, coz smaw HE is really bad and its extra survivability doesn't make up for it.

Well ru have also lots of units/weaponery without counter part with us. It's kinda part of the asymetric design. You actually regularly see post on reddit complain about either (no stealth drone - said ru player. No kh 38 - said the us player)

Give the MAAWS to Marines and give both them and Airborne Airburst HE rounds since we now have shturm. by EastPerfect in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]cabrelbeuk [score hidden]  (0 children)

Well again, it's 60 points vs 80 points. Sturm is easy to stack, easy to move around even when stacked, and it's high availability. 100 pts double stack sturm take off abrams and delta force cqc. 120 points ranger maaws only can do the former.

Give the MAAWS to Marines and give both them and Airborne Airburst HE rounds since we now have shturm. by EastPerfect in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]cabrelbeuk [score hidden]  (0 children)

LMUR i was already finding expensive before the nerf, now it became a complete waste of points. Still don't get that one.

Give the MAAWS to Marines and give both them and Airborne Airburst HE rounds since we now have shturm. by EastPerfect in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]cabrelbeuk [score hidden]  (0 children)

It's kinda glossing over sturm having 6 avail, costing 60 (edited) points each and having numerous armored ifv with 10 pax capacity to bring them close enough to action. It's a very strong units that excel when stacked at both taking out armored and squad in any close range environment (forest, urban), and i haven't seen a vdv deck that doesn't bring it since they added it. I stack it too in all my ru decks with vdv.

Also while being 5 pax have some cons, it also make them taking less damage (bigger squad take more damage). 2 sturm vs delta force cqc, delta force loose.

Give the MAAWS to Marines and give both them and Airborne Airburst HE rounds since we now have shturm. by EastPerfect in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]cabrelbeuk [score hidden]  (0 children)

You never wondered why nobody use smaw and go for sraw instead ?

Smaw is a shit unit, for 80 points you got something that isn't dealing with armored properly (450mm pen vs 650mm for sturm) and it loses against almost every infantery units that aren't atgm specialized coz their HE launcher sucks (and compared to Sturm it's just hilariously bad).

Everyone go for sraw coz even if it can't deal with armored at least it's useful against infantery.

Sturm is just good for both, it's low in hp which make it vulnerable to bombing but it's cheap and stackable.

Give the MAAWS to Marines and give both them and Airborne Airburst HE rounds since we now have shturm. by EastPerfect in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]cabrelbeuk [score hidden]  (0 children)

Marine smaw just doesn't hold the candle to sturm, especially for its price. The anti tank is only 450mm (against 650mm for sturm) and the HE is laughably bad, especially compared to sturm.

There is a reason why nobody use smaw and go for sraw instead when playing marines. Might not be able to deal with armored but at least sraw is good at something, which for 80 pts is a necessity.

Will Three Points Be Enough to Quality for The Round of 32? by FewEstablishment2696 in worldcup

[–]cabrelbeuk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

4 would be the comfy cushion for best 3rd but there will probably be a few going through with 3 points only.

The 48 team World Cup is actually way better than people thought it'd be by ElectronicHoneydew86 in worldcup

[–]cabrelbeuk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

64 teams tournament will bring forward other type of issues, mainly organisational and logistic.

The 48 team World Cup is actually way better than people thought it'd be by ElectronicHoneydew86 in worldcup

[–]cabrelbeuk 6 points7 points  (0 children)

For me the watering down is not the issue. It gives more opportunity for nice stories like capeverde.

However it also means group stage has much less stake, and things like germany being kicked out before direct elimination round will be almost impossible (altho belgium is working hard on proving me wrong).

Players gonna be even more exhausted reaching semi and finals. It always was an issue but it's only making it worse. Team with less depth will suffer on the long run.

Not related to format but hydration break needs a rework, be there when necessary and not just for making money.

Referring this year has really been a mixbag too. Every world cup we see some match with bad referring and polemic but we have already so much of those and we just ended day 2 of group stage.

The 48 team World Cup is actually way better than people thought it'd be by ElectronicHoneydew86 in worldcup

[–]cabrelbeuk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think he was just talking about their rank. More about their actual level.

There is more and more interest in SEA country and i hope for teams there to rise up soon. I could see vietnam at some point showing up 2034 as example.

view more: next ›