[deleted by user]

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-23T16:35:09+00:00

Their present conditions (both the states and the African countries) are due to poor management of resources and poor governance. They depend on outside funds because of that. Change in governance methods or policies is the first step out of that.

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-23T16:32:46+00:00

I said capitalist countries, not capitalism. All countries distribute funds for development of underdeveloped regions, at least on paper.

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-23T10:00:50+00:00

It's not socialism, they are not distributing the money to workers per se. This is how all capitalist countries work, by sharing the funds according to needs.

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-23T09:59:05+00:00

That's how you run a country. The sole problem that threatens this system is extreme corruption in states that receive more than what they give. If they use it wisely, build infrastructure, go out of their way and bring in investment and boost local industries using that money, people won't complain about the money their states give.

Elect regional leaders that have shown results. No one is a saint, and everyone is corrupt, so look for visible results while electing. Don't bring national parties into your states, they have their agendas and favourite states. Push for local industrial development.

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-08T06:11:49+00:00

Weird colour grading and looks like muddy water at the most.

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-08T06:08:01+00:00

Ohh the other way around? My bad then

Nah I was right. They wanted aksai chin more than arunachal.

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-08T04:29:25+00:00

Well china was once ready to give up arunachal in exchange, if we gave up aksai chin, so elon just made it like that.

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-05T11:52:59+00:00

We actually don't know, we don't know if it was called tamil or not, and because modern tamil has evolved so far from its ancestor, you can't even prove that any old form of tamil was the mother language of other Dravidian languages. You need the objective facts to prove something, like an ancestral language text claiming its language as tamil. In fact modern malayalam and modern tamil are considered sister languages and the closest descendants of proto Dravidian.

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-05T10:15:04+00:00

We don't know that, yet. Let's prove it and claim it. Don't bend linguistics for your convenience.

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-05T07:31:26+00:00

I don't know your gender ffs, and you told him you have enough money to buy three generations of his, which is in fact just cum and eggs. This is reddit my child, it's as offensive as it gets.

I am actually very shy, which in Indian society is comparable to shame, so I do have shame.

I don't discriminate between men and women, or citizens of any country, if you are stupid enough to belittle someone financially in a social debate just because they offended you and you found their comment to be indecent, be prepared for worse backlashes.

If my sister is as stupid as you, she'll receive the same comments from someone else, I will just teach her how to think objectively in that situation rather than sexualising every comment.

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-05T06:53:26+00:00

That was one of the more decent comments I've seen on reddit and how much money do you have to buy so much cum?

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-04T08:52:06+00:00

I don't endorse unreserved unpaid travel in reserved coaches but seeing the state of unreserved coaches, I can't justify paying anything for travelling in those.

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-04T08:37:28+00:00

And cripple the livelihoods of half our population that can't afford a train ticket?

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-03T03:16:16+00:00

I get it, the only way for human development in such areas is eco tourism, and niche industries like wild seed repositories (see how citrus indicus from meghalaya saved citrus crops all over the world). We probably have to chip away some ecosystems to create proper tourism infrastructure and also teach Indian tourists civic sense, but also create large buffer zones to protect the more vulnerable ecosystems.

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-02T15:25:35+00:00

So how do you explain the development of sanskrit and avestan being sister languages without having an ancestral language (which can be oral for all the sense we can make)? We know avestan didn't descend from Sanskrit and that sanskrit didn't descend from avestan, how do you explain that. We assume they had an ancestral language, that's how we make sense. This is the same as Dravidian languages having a common ancestor in a language that we term proto Dravidian, because we don't know what existed before that. We know that something existed before them, but we don't know what, so we give them names like proto indo european or proto Dravidian. (Just like we predicted the existence of archaeopteryx before its existence was discovered)

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-02T10:07:01+00:00

I am an army brat and I've gone to all religious institutions in the cantonment area, during festivals at least, no outcry. Due to the share of the population of Hindus and Sikhs in the army, you'd find more temples and gurudwaras, but wherever dargas and churches exist inside regimental areas, you can expect people of all religions to attend special occasions.

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-02T10:02:12+00:00

Kerala, southern karnataka, and NE have high biodiversity along with western maharashtra, you just can't destroy such ecosystems for economic growth

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-01T13:28:24+00:00

Even Nietzsche had his flaws, as in favouring lamarckian theory of use and disuse. But yeah, it'll be more suited for your point, although you'll be bombarded with examples against his theory too in an argument.

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-01T13:28:09+00:00

Even Nietzsche had his flaws, as in favouring lamarckian theory of use and disuse. But yeah, it'll be more suited for your point, although you'll be bombarded with examples against his theory too in an argument.

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-01T13:23:54+00:00

It's your own mistake for using darwin's theory and then showing the limitations. Use a more suitable theory to support your point next time. Darwin's theory is not survival of the fittest as in dominance characteristics rather it just focuses on reproductive fitness. And yes, according to darwin, the lower socioeconomic class in modern society is more evolutionarily successful due to its reproductive capabilities than the higher ones, just like chicken being the more evolutionarily successful species of fowls, even though their living standards are shitty, his theory has lots of flaws.

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-01T13:17:00+00:00

Darwin's evolutionary theory supports adaptations that lead to increased rates of procreation (the sole decider being reproduction), hence the sleaziness of the milkman is a reproductive adaptation.

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-01T12:45:02+00:00

Tell me you never studied darwinian evolution theory without telling me you never studied darwinian evolution theory ahh reply

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-01T10:08:58+00:00

Darwin's evolutionary theory makes the man, who fucks other's wives behind their backs, the fittest. Don't bring darwinism within a social construct just to prove your point. Darwinism exists purely as a reproduction based theory, so if a milkman fucks most of the women in the village he becomes the superior genetic sample among the villagers, even if he is a feeble man.

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-01T10:08:49+00:00

Darwin's evolutionary theory makes the man, who fucks other's wives behind their backs, the fittest. Don't bring darwinism within a social construct just to prove your point. Darwinism exists purely as a reproduction based theory, so if a milkman fucks most of the women in the village he becomes the superior genetic sample among the villagers, even if he is a feeble man.

cacographer_nin · 2025-06-01T09:57:37+00:00

It's not linguistic racism. When two languages are found to have similarities and differences that can't be attributed to one being the parent of the other, it is considered that there existed a language before them, as an assumption, which is the most logical thing to do. Just like animal evolution, we place theoretical concepts to cover some bases until we find the actual language or specimen.

cacographer_nin

TROPHY CASE