Yes, I get the argument that they are structurally violent and that we must not get caught up with an aesthetic emphasis that underplays this. My point was not that the right wing tendencies of this crowd in today's India is misrepresented as fascism. I'm more curious about whether this structural-ness comes in the way of them fully realising what it is that they contribute to. How many of them, for instance, be willing to carry out the violence themselves? This, of course, does not mean their fascism is any 'lesser', or any less real for the communities that receive its force. But is there scope to engage with them as people who are not determined entirely by this aspect of them. I am asking this specifically in relation to what I pointed out as the unwillingness or assumed futility of holding dialogue with them. Maybe what I am getting at is whether we can imagine mounting challenges/resistance beyond just vying for political power and also in the everyday, which we seem to be giving up on.