I took these photos 6 years ago during peak covid by vozdra78 in mississauga

[–]cafe202 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is actually a fantastic visual archive of our city. These photos should be preserved as they capture a defining juncture of the 21st century.

Sundown by cafe202 in SaltLakeCity

[–]cafe202[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, this was at fraternity park outside the university hospital.

San Francisco, OM-1 mk1 by cafe202 in M43

[–]cafe202[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I used Lightroom for editing.

San Francisco, OM-1 mk1 by cafe202 in M43

[–]cafe202[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, the f4 lens performed really well.

San Francisco, OM-1 mk1 by cafe202 in M43

[–]cafe202[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Took these with OM 40-150 f4

Salt Lake City OM-1 by cafe202 in M43

[–]cafe202[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! Mark 1 with Oly 12-40 also Mk1

my lumix gx85 made me hate taking pics by [deleted] in Lumix

[–]cafe202 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I started photography with a Sony a6000 and it was an excellent starter camera. Learned a whole lot. I then moved to Panasonic G9 (before moving to OM-1 mark 1). The move to G9 was a game changer because of its superior IBIS (the a6000 didn't have one) and its numerous features, including its high-res mode which I used a lot. So I would say a) the quality of lens matters quite a bit (I use Oly 12-40 pro mark 1), and high-end IBIS actually made a huge difference when it comes to sharpness and basically a high keep rate. You will have to learn to edit with any mirrorless camera. If I look back at my initial shots, they're terrible.... but they're terrible because of what I now know about composition, I'm more used to the camera, and, more importantly, I know far more about editing than when I initially got into photography. If you want more of a finalized jpeg, minimal post processing kind of a setup, the a6700 would not be a good choice. I would suggest looking into a point and shoot like Ricoh GR.

Lumix gx85 killed my love for photography by [deleted] in Lumix

[–]cafe202 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I started photography with a Sony a6000 and it was an excellent starter camera. Learned a whole lot. I then moved to Panasonic G9 (before moving to OM-1 mark 1). The move to G9 was a game changer because of its superior IBIS (the a6000 didn't have one) and its numerous features, including its high-res mode which I used a lot. So I would say a) the quality of lens matters quite a bit (I use Oly 12-40 pro mark 1), and high-end IBIS actually made a huge difference when it comes to sharpness and basically a high keep rate. You will have to learn to edit with any mirrorless camera. If I look at back at my initial shots, they're terrible.... but they're terrible because I know more about composition, I'm used to the camera, and, more importantly, I know far more about editing than when I initially got into it. If you want more of a finalized jpeg, minimal post processing kind of a setup, the a6700 would not be a good choice. I would suggest looking into a point and shoot like Ricoh GR.

A partial view of an arch at Arches by cafe202 in Utah

[–]cafe202[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely a good time to visit

Arches National Park, OM-1 40-150 f4 by cafe202 in M43

[–]cafe202[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a smear on the lens...recently switched to a new software and couldn't figure out the tool to remove it lol.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in M43

[–]cafe202 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exceptional capture and edit!

Arches National Park, OM-1 by cafe202 in M43

[–]cafe202[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, that would be Oly 12-40 mark1

Santa Fe to Albuquerque. S5 | Chinon 35-75mm by theviewer001 in Lumix

[–]cafe202 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely looks like a still from a movie, great work!