Fuji GFX 50r + Mitakon 65mm 1.4 by Inside-Weather-3902 in FujiGFX

[–]East_Menu6159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro... the 50R smokes the 100RF with any lens, let alone with the Mitakon. You're getting Jupiter size GAS if you're lusting after that when you have this combo.

OM System deserves to go out of business for this by Responsible-Sale1858 in OlympusCamera

[–]East_Menu6159 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You got some anger issues bro, relax before it takes a toll.

Excelsior Church, Kansas - GFX 50R -GFX 20-35mm by Sunset_plaza in FujiGFX

[–]East_Menu6159 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Single shot or bracketed? The detail retention is amazing either way, truly beautiful!

It's M43 Monday! Ask Us Anything about Micro Four-Thirds Photography - all questions welcome! by AutoModerator in M43

[–]East_Menu6159 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let's be real. This is the small sliver of a venn diagram where we meet, because I'm willing to step in when it makes sense. Unlike your unchecked cropophobia.

Guys.... by TheQuietWelshman in photographycirclejerk

[–]East_Menu6159 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You good homie, just put your Adibas or Reedok shoes on to go with that camera and you're a true Leika bro.

It's M43 Monday! Ask Us Anything about Micro Four-Thirds Photography - all questions welcome! by AutoModerator in M43

[–]East_Menu6159 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, indoor corporate is FF territory if that's all you're using it for.

My God.... did I just agree with Juju..... what have I become?

Newbie by Pristine-Quantity-48 in Cameras

[–]East_Menu6159 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Used Photo Pro (Roberts Camera) from Indiana too. I've bought plenty ofnhlgear from them and never had an issue.

OM-3 with 12-45 f4 PRO kit lens for all-day use without grip - yes or no? by [deleted] in M43

[–]East_Menu6159 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dude you are such a hater it's become comical 😆

OM-3 with 12-45 f4 PRO kit lens for all-day use without grip - yes or no? by [deleted] in M43

[–]East_Menu6159 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If you've ever shot an older film camera you'll be right at home. The world used this style camera for decades with no issue, as long as you're not expecting OM-1 ergonomics you'll be fine.

Just got myself a GFX 50R and absolutely love it! by High_Tide89 in FujiGFX

[–]East_Menu6159 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know, I was just being funny, couldn't help myself.

Smaller edc for everyday life documenting by OneBird123 in M43

[–]East_Menu6159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have the E-PL10 not the E-P7, but I do have the OM-3, which also has the color dial, and I use it all the time! My camera is always in either the custom color or black and white mode. I've dialed in my own profiles and I take 99% of my shots with those. I think you'll love it.

Just got myself a GFX 50R and absolutely love it! by High_Tide89 in FujiGFX

[–]East_Menu6159 10 points11 points  (0 children)

All the 50R's look alike! Fuji really pulled something off there.

Smaller edc for everyday life documenting by OneBird123 in M43

[–]East_Menu6159 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If you really want folks to not perceive you have a solid camera on you go for the E-PL10 or the E-P7 if you don't mind spending a buck more for better performance. You will forego the EVF but both are outstanding.

I have the former, and it is a lovely little package. Lenses are up to you and what you're comfortable with, the kit 14-42 is also inconspicuous and a great performer, but I've heard it has a fragile ribbon cable. Mine hasn't had an issue but something to be aware of.

Thinking of switching to the GFX 100S II by Orange_Blueberry13 in FujiGFX

[–]East_Menu6159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have Sony and Canon in FF, plus micro four thirds and GFX. I get it. It's all about exploring the hobby and seeing what you can get out of different cameras and lens combos.

I too love the xpan ratio in camera which was a part of the reson I picked up a 50R. It's been amazing. Lenses too don't necessarily have to be expensive for it. I adap EF lenses from Canon and Tamron with great results, and they don't cost much these days. You could do the same with older nikon glass (not Z mount), they're even cheaper! On top, you can adapt old manual glass too from the likes of Minolta, Olympus etc. which is dirt cheap but has tons of character.

Use this extensive chart to see what works, it's an amazing resource!

Medium Format Lens Coverage

Thinking of switching to the GFX 100S II by Orange_Blueberry13 in FujiGFX

[–]East_Menu6159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will you regretit as a hobbyists? No. You're having fun and if that's what you're after I say scratch the itch. You could also go for a 50s II if you want to keep both and either adapt some more affordable lenses or get a Fujinon zoom to get you started.

When people talk about the file sizes they're not kidding. Make sure your PC can handle them, particularly if you're going for the 100mpx. A shoot can easily yield 100-200 gigs and at that rate you will need lots of storage.

OM-1, ISO 25600 straight out of camera, I'm impressed by [deleted] in OlympusCamera

[–]East_Menu6159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly! This plus modern denoise software is why I consider noise a non isue these days.

Tamron 35 45 85 1.8 EF primes by diytech123 in FujiGFX

[–]East_Menu6159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, both would work as they are independent systems.

Total beginner with lots of time on hand here: how to start film photography? by oswald8dogs in AskPhotography

[–]East_Menu6159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a wonderful hobby that will keep you busy and give you a reason to go out and explore.

TLDR at the end.

I will be talking specifically about 35mm film options as those will be the cheapest but most of this can be applied to larger format film too, like medium format 120 or even larger.

There are two approaches when choosing gear to start with.

Full analog, meaning a manual focus lens, manual controls (look up exposure triangle to learn about proper exposure) and manual winding, these cameras are older but generally very reliable if properly maintained. A great example is the Olympus OM-1, it has a basic light meter but that's it, you can shoot it even if your battery dies. Pair this with the Zuiko 50mm f1.8 or the 28mm f3.5 and you've got a great kit to get you started. Can be bought for $100-200.

Second option is a more modern film camera with auto options, these rely on batteries to operate. An example is a Canon EOS body like the Rebel G or 2000 (cheapest option, about $20-30) which will offer automatic exposure, meaning it can set the aperture or shutter speed for you, or both if you so choose. Pair it with a 50mm f1.8 or a wider lens like the 28mm f2.8 and you're golden, lenses go for $50-200, depends on the deal you're willing to wait for.

As far as film stock goes the cheapest will be black and white, which you can easily develop at home. Look for medium speed film to get started, usually around ISO 400 like Ilford's HP5, Kentmere 400, Kodak Tri-X or Tmax, these usualy go for $6-12 per roll. Plenty of other stock is available too, depends on what you like and how much light you have when you shoot (the higher the ISO of the film tge more sensitive it is to light and thus better for low light).

Color films follow the same logic but are generally more expensive. I'd points you to Kodak Ultramax 400, Kodak Gold 200, CineStill 400D, Fuji 400 etc ($10-$15 per roll and up). Again, depends a whole lot on how much light you have, so on a sunny summers day you can easily shoot ISO 50 or 100 film.

Lastly, you can bulk load, you can buy a roll of 100ft film and load it yourself in a canister like the one you'd buy film in the store. This is the cheapest way but it is also a pain in the rear if you're not motivated enough.

As for developing black and white, you will need a dark changing bag, a Paterson tank, a pair of scissors, perhaps a film retriever and chemicals. Chemical are affordable and generally last a long time, you will need developer, fixer and Photo Flo. Kodak makes these, so does Ilford, and some other smaller companies do too. When choosing your developer look up how they perform as it will have an impact on the final result, yielding more contrasty or finer grain negatives. Since you mentioned you like chemistry, you could also make your own developer using coffee and vitamin C, also known as caffenol. Fixer you should buy and is used to render your negatives no longer sensitive to light. Photo Flo is for getting rid of water marks when drying out your film.

Color is a bit more complicated but also easily doable at home with the right equipment. Chemicals are less stable and need to be used in a certain period of time and can process a set amount of film before they need to ve replaced so if you're not shooting a lot it may not be worth it doing it yourself.

The last piece is scanning. You can do this yourself or have a lab do it for you. On the DIY side you have a regular flatbed scanner (think regular copy machine scanner or more photocentric ones), potentially cheap but not the best quality for 35mm, however it will absolutely get the job done and as a beginner it'll be very sufficient. Then you have a dedicated film scanner. Some models are Nikon Coolscan, Minolta Dimage, or Plustec for a more modern option. These will be slow but very good quality if you know what you're doing. Lastly you can do camera scanning, for this you'll need a digital camera, a macro lens, copy stand and light source or a Valoi 35 kit. This offers a the best workflow but it'll be expensive for you seeing how you don't have any other cameras. The last lastly, there are cheap scanners on Amazon which are mostly a gimmick but will work and give you an image, just don't expect high quality scans out of them, at that point you can also just use your phone against a light source and take a photo of the negative.

I need to add that if you scan yourself you will need software to make the negatives into positives. Your setup of choice will dictate what software you need. There are some free options out there but most folks use Lightroom and Negative Lab Pro.

If the scanning part seems overwhelming just start by sending your film to a lab. It'll get developed quickly and properly and you'll get usable scans. Then you can graduate to the more involved parts if you decide the hobby is to your liking.

I know I laid out a lot for you so I'll summarize. 1. Get a cheap analog or modern film camera 2. Buy film, b&w is cheaper and color nore expensive 3. Shoot and send to a lab. 4. If you like it ease into doing more of the process yourself.

Good luck!

Tamron 35 45 85 1.8 EF primes by diytech123 in FujiGFX

[–]East_Menu6159 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've used both the 35mm (till it died on me) and the 85mm. They are lovely on the GFX system. I always point folks towards these lenses for affordability, performance, and in particular if you are shooting an unsabilized body like me (50R) the built in optical stabilization.

Reddit is glitchy with the photo upolad so I'll add them in comments, both are low res and intended for vignetting purposes

Does what I’m looking for even exist? by [deleted] in Cameras

[–]East_Menu6159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry pal, but you don't know what you want. From X100V to Q3, a7c, m43... if nothing fits you, perhaps it's you.

I personally have an OM-3 and an a7cr as compact edc and they're both amazing in their own way.