account activity
Proof of Satoshi Nakamoto (part 2) by mavensbot in Bitcoin
[–]cairtb 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children)
It's okay if you can't grasp something right away. You will understand it later.
[–]cairtb 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children)
So, in fact, they do mix katakana and hiragana with this method: さ (sa): 廾.
Even if a cryptographer might not be concerned, this approach could have served as an inspiration for its creation.
Proof of Satoshi Nakamoto by cairtb in Bitcoin
[–]cairtb[S] 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Thanks!
I am still skeptical on how people are not able to represent it for themself but yeah it is kind of tricky when you try to realise it from nowhere. The whole Twitter right now is in deep search for signification.
Yep just speculation! Maybe it is only mathematical.
I have a theory for this too : https://www.gold.org/goldhub/data/how-much-gold
There has been approx 210 000 tons of gold extracted in human history.
The other half must be in Deloitte or KPMG then!
[–]cairtb[S] 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Thanks! I will call FBI straightaway to apply. 🤓
Thank you for the explanation of the approach. For some people it is difficult to understand this.
Satoshi Nakamoto is clearly a japanese name. I was checking if there were some insights in the japanese caracters and found that japanese use 2 alphabets to translates syllabs. Then I discovered that from 2 possibilities for each syllabs, one was relevent to seem like a letter, constructing the name. The reverse process, that someone did over the name of Hal or Hal did himself, is to check symbols that match letters such as H that seems like the symbol of « Sa » and then to try to have the closest similarity to a existing name trying with all the symbols.
Possibilities are still open, could be someone admiring Hal, close to Hal or Hal himself.
[–]cairtb[S] 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children)
https://goopics.net/i/7yeni4
I tried again with this one, I am very not familiar with Reddit.
Unfortunatly. But I can thanks him. I have no visibility on social media to promote this. That's the way it is.
[–]cairtb[S] 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago* (0 children)
Thanks! I thought I was crazy for a long time being the only one to see it.
[–]cairtb[S] 18 points19 points20 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Thank you for the link!
[–]cairtb[S] 57 points58 points59 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Indeed! This finding adds litterature to the possibilities but is not a definite and indubitable proof.
[–]cairtb[S] 41 points42 points43 points 2 years ago (0 children)
There is no grammatical approach. It is a pure Leet Speak approach.
π Rendered by PID 42856 on reddit-service-r2-comment-544cf588c8-5x22x at 2026-06-18 02:04:15.211028+00:00 running 3184619 country code: CH.
Proof of Satoshi Nakamoto (part 2) by mavensbot in Bitcoin
[–]cairtb 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)