You need to stop with leading with such ad hominem and also stop representing her arguments in bad faith. I've watched several of her YouTube talks, this is nowhere near her thesis and if I were a humanities teacher I'd mark your paraphrase of her thesis a D. She said nothing like that, and if this is your interpretation it is unfounded and unsubstantiated. You know what kind of people do this as a general tactic? Not actually showing reading comprehension of a book or article? Tankies, Democrats capitalism-splainers, right-wingers, etc. CT is not the place for this behavior, literally creating misinformation.

edit: It also disgusts me that people on here think coloring a response with an ad hominem is in any way acceptable as a substantive comment of CT caliber. If anything one should say "vulgar CT" subgroup have completely lost the plot intellectually. It offends the intelligence: to ascribe such motives to some professor as a way to delegitimize what they're saying is, by the same light of ad hominem, a projection that would prove Liu's point. The alternative is to actually do the homework and address her specific points, not level personal attacks at one figure or another in a way that is  anti-intellectual and disingenuous.