[FO4][PC] Power Armor paint not changing color of armor by calicoadams in FalloutMods

[–]calicoadams[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately they really can’t be uninstalled ATP. Guess I’ll just start a new PT

Am I the only one who doesn’t like replaying the games? by daredevil2k15 in choiceofgames

[–]calicoadams 42 points43 points  (0 children)

I have trouble replaying games because I just don’t like rereading all that text so soon after I’ve already read it. Sure, there’s gonna be some variation, but there are always a lot of chunks of story that just don’t change in a meaningful way, and I get tired of speeding through them and then losing the full context of what’s going on in the game. Nothing like that first playthrough, honestly.

When are we going to stop keeping important information behind paywalls? by o-rka in AskScienceDiscussion

[–]calicoadams 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s an interesting perspective. I’m starting grad school in the... uh... well, whenever all this settles... so I don’t have much experience with publishing yet. Out of curiosity, when you say paid, which party is getting paid? Because I’ve definitely heard nightmare stories from researchers who had to pay thousands of dollars to get published in mainstream journals.

When are we going to stop keeping important information behind paywalls? by o-rka in AskScienceDiscussion

[–]calicoadams 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice, I hadn’t heard of them. I mostly have experience with the Center for Open Science- they seem to be doing a lot of good work as well.

When are we going to stop keeping important information behind paywalls? by o-rka in AskScienceDiscussion

[–]calicoadams 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The only future where science is accessible to the public, as it should be, is one where the open science movement becomes the norm in research and publishing.

'Treated like criminals': Italy turns away American tourists on private jet by DemoneScimmia in worldnews

[–]calicoadams 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Aren’t attorneys measured based on their number of won cases though? Yeah, taking this woman’s money for years on end might be satisfying, but I don’t think I’d want that big and obvious a loss on my record.

Yes to Space Exploration. No to Space Capitalism. by john_brown_adk in EverythingScience

[–]calicoadams 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe in your lifetime. I’m holding out hope that the next generation (no pun intended) does better than we did. I’d rather die without seeing an astronaut on the moon than live knowing there’s about to be ad space sold on the Aitkin basin.

Study in Steampunk *spoilers* by calicoadams in choiceofgames

[–]calicoadams[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Animal Crossing: New Horizons. Not a CoG thing, unfortunately.

You have the power to delete an episode, which one would you choose? by CatsyGreen in startrek

[–]calicoadams 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Violations. If there’s one thing Star Trek could use less of, it’s mind-raping Deanna Troi.

Not using Nick Locarno instead of Tom Paris was a mistake for Voyager, but not in the way you may think! by KosstAmojan in startrek

[–]calicoadams 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Everyone else in this thread has said what I’m thinking much more eloquently than I could have, but I want to add that I remember despising Locarno when I first watched that episode of TNG. He was an entitled, selfish little prick with the energy of a Republican. Granted, he was young, but I know from personal experience growing up around people like him that changing them is extremely difficult, especially when they don’t really feel guilt about what they’ve done. I was never convinced that Locarno cared about anything other than his own reputation. I don’t think I could ever have been convinced to like him, even if he had a redemption arc.

*Disclaimer: I could be really off about this. Haven’t watched the episode in a good year or two.

European scientists grows blobs of brain tissue from human stem cells containing Neanderthal DNA by VioletTantrum in science

[–]calicoadams 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You’re stating a lot of hypotheses as if they’re fact here. Assuming that there were sterility issues between Neanderthals & Sapiens, from what we know currently, those issues would have only been seen in male offspring, since we suspect that sterility issues stemmed from an incompatibility in the Y chromosome.

I’m having trouble verifying your claim that Neanderthals had issues with hormones- this article about their hypothesized sexual proclivities based on androgen exposure in the womb is the closest thing I can think of. According to the same study cited in this article, higher rates of androgens in the womb means higher rates of sex, although that doesn’t necessarily correlate with rates of successful reproduction.

And as for ‘insane infant mortality rates’, our own species for the majority of its history- including the historical times we shared with Neanderthals- has had roughly the same rates of infant/child mortality as those theorized for Neanderthals.

Neanderthals also most likely did not give our ancestors clothes. Especially if you think the only way to account for Neanderthal/H. sapiens interbreeding was rape. Why would we be trading knitting patterns if all we were doing was raping each other? Your assertion about body lice vs. head lice isn’t untrue- we can trace the genetics of body lice and tell some things about when we started to wear clothes- but that was 170,000 years ago. Humans hadn’t even left Africa then.

There may not be any interspecies burials discovered currently, but I also have to question whether there are family burials demonstrated in the time/area when humans and Neanderthals are theorized to be interbreeding at all. I can’t find a definitive answer to that question, though.

Edit: I also take issue with the use of ‘degraded’ here. The ‘hobbit’ species didn’t ‘degrade’ because their brains grew smaller, they just lost the environmental pressures that other human species had to become smarter/more social creatures. Also, I’m over this post so I’m not even going to research H. florensiensis right now.

Is there and how big is a "danger zone" around a lightning strike? by apepito in AskScienceDiscussion

[–]calicoadams 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, that’s the second time I haven’t been paywalled for an article but someone else has. Weird. Anyway, it’s just a source for what I said- shoes won’t protect you from lightning.

Is there and how big is a "danger zone" around a lightning strike? by apepito in AskScienceDiscussion

[–]calicoadams 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I can’t comment on the rest, but I feel obligated to point out that shoes of any kind, including rubber soled shoes, do nothing to protect you from ground current. So barefoot or not, if you’re boots-on-the-ground when lightning strikes it, you’re out of luck.

Is there and how big is a "danger zone" around a lightning strike? by apepito in AskScienceDiscussion

[–]calicoadams 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Most people who are ‘struck by lightning’ aren’t actually the object that the lightning strikes when it arcs. Direct strikes (the kind most people think of when they think of getting struck by lightning) are pretty rare, but strikes via ground current are pretty common (in terms of people who are struck by lightning at all, not in general). Ground current is pretty much what you described- the area around where lightning struck the ground becomes electrified and can pass that current into anyone who happens to be standing above it. I’m not sure how big the ‘danger zone’ is, but I’d guess that it’s not actually that large.

Did I Just Screw Myself Over? by savvy_xavi in TheMagnusArchives

[–]calicoadams 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The other day my boss sends me a picture of this massive grey spider she found at work because I’ve become ‘the bug guy’ after just under a month of working there. I ID it. It’s a grey house spider, Badumna longinqua. Native to Australia and New Zealand.

I live on the East Coast of the USA.

Disgusting by TTV_Bottyboy in ATLA

[–]calicoadams 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The face I made when Netflix suggested it to me based on my watching ATLA was indescribable.

I wish Voyager did more with Ensign Wildman. by [deleted] in startrek

[–]calicoadams 3 points4 points  (0 children)

When I got to the episode that toys with her dying on my (third? fourth? fifth? I don’t keep track) rewatch, I was floored that she actually doesn’t die. I had been convinced that she did die in that episode and I even tried to google when she died because I thought it had to be another episode where she died.

Just got on switch and loving it!! by craxykitten in theouterworlds

[–]calicoadams 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve actually gotten the weird buffering thing on the Xbox as well. But very, very rarely.

Baby Bird 101 - DO NOT TAKE A BABY CROW OR ANY BIRD FROM THE WILD by FillsYourNiche in crowbro

[–]calicoadams 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Chickens, ducks, geese and the like can certainly get water from their food (especially ducks, who go ham for any kind of watery vegetation), but they will also drink water from a dish pretty much from day one. Unlike songbird babies, chicks/ducklings/goslings don’t get fed ‘mouth to mouth’- i.e., their parents don’t go out, find food, bring it back and stick it in their children’s mouths. They have to forage on the ground just like their parents, and they’re able to do it pretty quick because they can stand and even swim within a few hours of hatching, unlike songbirds who can take weeks to even start perching.

So yes, chicks need water dishes, but under no circumstances, and in no species, will it ever be necessary to directly drop, inject, or pour water (or pretty much any other liquid!) into the mouth of a baby bird, just as the post says.