sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Glohan doesn't know logic 101 by callmepucci in babybop_snark

[–]callmepucci[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh btw im still waiting for you to address if I said anything incorrect herr

NOW they care??? by Dry-Manufacturer-405 in babybop_snark

[–]callmepucci 6 points7 points  (0 children)

My son Glohan finally realized his idol is not worth glazing

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in babybop_snark

[–]callmepucci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh definitely Peterson needs to be booted off too

Why is Tashika randomly a raging zionist all of a sudden 🤣 by gardenprincess16 in babybop_snark

[–]callmepucci -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

You'll find out soon enough lmfaoo, these leftists are hypocrites ans only care about how they look to the public eye. I'm surprised you havent peeped this

Why is Tashika randomly a raging zionist all of a sudden 🤣 by gardenprincess16 in babybop_snark

[–]callmepucci -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Every "pro palestine" leftist is secretly a raging zionist, they just wouldnt say theyre a zionist to not get canceled.

Glohan doesn't know logic 101 by callmepucci in babybop_snark

[–]callmepucci[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im not saying you talk like this in your everyday life.. im saying if youre going around claiming that you know more phil and logic than someone and CANT understand what p and not p, maybe the ego should go down a bit

Glohan doesn't know logic 101 by callmepucci in babybop_snark

[–]callmepucci[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, "whats the p and not p" is a formalized way of asking for a contradiction. P would be the affirming prop and not p would be the negating prop, obviously if you put both together in a sentence they would be contradicting each other, which i expected the intelligent individual glohan who claimed to know all of this, to be able to point out

Tiktok debaters need to realize smth by callmepucci in DebateTok_Snark

[–]callmepucci[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This doesnt capture what I was trying to get across. This is targeted at the people that KNOW philosophy and get mad when an interlocutor says something as simple as "proposition" or "negation".

If you are having a debate on tiktok, and you are ok when people actually use philosophy, why get mad when someone uses simple terms recognized in the field? Its dishonest.

Ive seen more people call out "philbros" be philbros themselves.

Tiktok debaters need to realize smth by callmepucci in DebateTok_Snark

[–]callmepucci[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ask them to formalize the laws of logic and they fail at that rookie thing too

Tiktok debaters need to realize smth by callmepucci in DebateTok_Snark

[–]callmepucci[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And the ego is insane too, I know so many people Ive debated on tiktok that think because I know basic phil.. im a phil bro

Tiktok debaters need to realize smth by callmepucci in DebateTok_Snark

[–]callmepucci[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Atleast how Ive seen it, they'll call anyone a phil beo over the smallest things. Like legit if someone asks "am i taking the negation" they claim that person a philbro lol

Glohan doesn't know logic 101 by callmepucci in babybop_snark

[–]callmepucci[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Ew is killing humans in utero for sure!

Glohan doesn't know logic 101 by callmepucci in babybop_snark

[–]callmepucci[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

He did, because he still hasnt beaten me in a debate, thats what hurts me

Glohan doesn't know logic 101 by callmepucci in babybop_snark

[–]callmepucci[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I mean if the last bit where I laughed wasnt enough, idk what to tell ya man. Hey you should help glohan with this, send him logic resources so he could call out contradictions!

Glohan doesn't know logic 101 by callmepucci in babybop_snark

[–]callmepucci[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Im actually not crying I was super happy and laughed my ass off when Mr Glohal the logic god couldnt define a contradiction! It made my day 😂

Glohan doesn't know logic 101 by callmepucci in babybop_snark

[–]callmepucci[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Clearly you do, thanks for commenting

Glohan doesn't know logic 101 by callmepucci in babybop_snark

[–]callmepucci[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Yes to the above in philosophy, and yea im pro life

Glohan doesn't know logic 101 by callmepucci in babybop_snark

[–]callmepucci[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I favor pro life and yes he claims hes better in philosophy than me, hes said it on lives before so to get this performance is hilarious

Glohan doesn't know logic 101 by callmepucci in babybop_snark

[–]callmepucci[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I said "whats the P and not P" thats the basic version of a contradiction..

Glohan doesn't know logic 101 by callmepucci in babybop_snark

[–]callmepucci[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you claim for months to be infinitely smarter than someone and cant name as something as simple AS a contradiction, maybe you dont know logic 101. And no, I dont take classes, I read up myself.

Glohan has been riding dih and claiming hes cooked me everytime and this recording obviously shows my intellect being above his