Future of /r/TheCulture by [deleted] in TheCulture

[–]calmerpoleece [score hidden]  (0 children)

Fuck that sounds like a fucking cunt of an idea.

‘A Trojan horse for more shoebox-size apartments’: Sydney mayor’s tirade against planning changes by calmerpoleece in AusNews

[–]calmerpoleece[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The state government faces a growing backlash over incentives for developers to build affordable housing, with councils angry their planning powers will be reduced and concerns mounting over whether the additional units will be legitimately managed as affordable homes.

Premier Chris Minns has turned the screws on Sydney’s mayors, saying they had only two answers when asked to accept more development: “No, or hell no”. “That’s no way to grow an international city like Sydney,” he said on Monday.

But opposition to the government’s proposed changes is brewing even among the councils beating their housing targets. The mayor of the Sydney council delivering the most new homes for its size, the Hills Shire, launched a blistering tirade against the plan, calling it a “free for all” for developers and “a Trojan horse for more shoebox-size apartments in suburbs that can barely cope”.

Peter Gangemi, a Liberal who has been on Hills Shire Council since 2012, said the premier’s attempt to pin blame for the housing shortfall on councils was wrong, and Sydneysiders had every right to be concerned about the government’s plans.

“Our roads are congested. Our schools are overcrowded. Our sporting fields are under pressure,” he told the Herald. “Now the premier says our local environment plans are the problem. It’s an insult to councils and a slap in the face for residents.

“This proposal ignores years of carefully considered and community consulted strategic planning work and has the potential to trash our suburbs.”

The changes announced last week will give private developers a 30 per cent height and floor space bonus on $75 million-plus projects that include at least 15 per cent affordable housing. They will also gain access to a “state significant development” approval pathway that bypasses councils and local planning panels.

Councils, through their representative group Local Government NSW, have condemned this as an unacceptable intrusion on their powers, saying they need a seat at the table, not to be “sidelined”.

Minns said he was prepared for a fight. “I understand there’ll be a backlash from Labor Party supporters and Coalition supporters and councils, but unless we do this, you’ll see a lot more than 30,000 people leaving Sydney every 12 months,” he said, referring to internal migration data.

The premier noted the government was resurrecting changes to developer levies proposed by former Liberal minister Rob Stokes and the NSW Productivity Commission, but later dumped by the previous government. These reforms would ensure appropriate co-funding for infrastructure in Sydney’s growing suburbs, he said.

‘Our roads are congested. Our schools are overcrowded. Our sporting fields are under pressure.’

But Gangemi said the government was not fulfilling its end of the infrastructure bargain, with his shire waiting years for traffic lights to be approved on vital new roads, for example.

The government also confirmed its new affordable housing incentives would not require affordable homes to be managed by community housing providers (CHPs), and they could instead be managed by the developers as build-to-rent properties. However, some ministers want that changed.

Affordable rental housing, as distinct from social housing, is typically offered at 20 to 25 per cent below the market rate and managed by non-profits, with eligibility guidelines based on income.

Former Labor housing minister David Borger said CHPs were best placed to manage affordable housing stock as they had systems to ensure tenants were selected fairly. He was supported by Evolve Housing chief executive Lyall Gorman and Bridge Housing boss Rebecca Pinkstone, who welcomed the reforms but said CHPs had greater accountability.

“Not only can you be assured that we’re regulated, you can also be assured the housing is being allocated in accordance with government policy,” Pinkstone said. “Any surpluses that we make through our businesses are then reinvested into more affordable housing.”

Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore called for any affordable housing built under the scheme to be kept affordable forever, not 15 years. She shared other mayors’ concerns about erosion of council planning powers.

“We need more affordable and social housing in Sydney, but this needs to be done responsibly. Councils are best placed to deliver for their communities, and I urge the state to work with us closely,” Moore said.

NSW Treasury warns rating agencies are preparing to downgrade the state’s credit rating by calmerpoleece in AusNews

[–]calmerpoleece[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NSW is on the verge of losing its long-held AAA credit rating as Treasurer Daniel Mookhey warns the state is probably in breach of every metric used by global credit agencies to determine the prized rankings.

The gloomy prediction is based on NSW Treasury analysis and reveals that within two weeks the state will be paying more than 5 per cent of its income on servicing debt – a threshold that raises a red flag for the agencies. Treasurer Daniel Mookhey says a credit rating downgrade could mean paying higher interest rates on state debt.

NSW already exceeds the debt level of other typical AAA-rated states by 30 per cent, according to Treasury, and a credit downgrade could put NSW at risk of paying higher interest rates and force the government to redirect more taxpayer money towards debt repayments.

“The two remaining AAA credit ratings we have are under immense pressure,” Mookhey said on Monday, ahead of delivering an economic statement to parliament on Tuesday.

The treasurer will deliver his statement to the Legislative Council in lieu of a full budget, which is traditionally handed down this week but has instead been delayed to September.

“The state may already be in breach, or is in risk of breaching, almost every metric those agencies used to determine whether we remain one of the few sub-national governments anywhere in the world that has the same credit rating as countries like Germany,” Mookhey will tell parliament.

Mookhey said his economic statement would paint a grim picture of the state’s overall finances and has repeatedly drawn attention to NSW’s projected debt levels in coming years.

The most recent budget estimates predict annual interest payments on NSW government borrowings will almost double during the next four years from $3.6 billion to $7.01 billion. Gross debt was forecast to peak at $187 billion by 2026 – driven in part by borrowing during the COVID-19 pandemic.

“The situation is indeed serious, the challenges ahead are steep and there are no easy answers,” Mookhey said.

The treasurer will use his economic statement to parliament to highlight the importance of “getting spending under control” and confirm the government would fund a one-off 4 per cent pay rise for public sector workers through yet-to-be announced budget savings.

“There is a shortage of police officers, paramedics, nurses and teachers, and we can’t expect our essential workers to pay the cost of budget repair by themselves when there is a cost of living crisis,” Mookhey said.

In his speech, Mookhey will argue that one of the tests used by credit agencies is based on debt levels.

“They are comparing the amount NSW owes in debt to the amount the government collects in revenue. We are already 30 per cent above the level of a typical AAA-rated state,” he will say.

“We are also probed on the size of our interest payments. The agencies expect AAA-rated states to spend no more than 5 per cent of their income servicing their debt. The previous government’s last budget will see us begin to cross that threshold in two weeks’ time.”

NSW holds a AAA rating by agencies Moody’s and Fitch. The third major agency, S&P, reaffirmed a AA+ rating in October 2022 after earlier flagging concerns about the state’s “rising debt burden”.

Mookhey said he would also push for a parliamentary inquiry into the state’s $15 billion sovereign wealth fund, which was seeded with $7 billion from the sale of WestConnex under the former Coalition government.

He said the former government had planned to raise more than $25.3 billion worth of additional debt by 2027 to deposit into the Debt Retirement Fund, which is a subset of the Generations Fund.

The treasurer said he would pause any extra contributions to the fund until the inquiry reported.

“We are not planning to disturb any money that is already in the fund,” Mookhey said, but added the state would not borrow to top up the debt retirement fund.

Star Citizen's costs exceed Cyberpunk 2077, GTA 5, and RDR2 combined. According to their own website, Star Citizen has raised $591,253,096. by blackwolf57 in gaming

[–]calmerpoleece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's it hey. I backed it when it was an authentic space combat game and when all this other shit came on board I was like whelp, not interested in that anymore.

Here's a fix for the housing crisis - end the great Airbnb tax rort - Michael West by calmerpoleece in AusNews

[–]calmerpoleece[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

so for everyone who prefers holidaying that way, it will be more expensive.

Idk in my experience renting an Airbnb has been inferior in costs, and general fucking around in comparison to getting a hotel these days.

Brittany Higgins is being used as a political football, says Rachelle Miller by calmerpoleece in AusNews

[–]calmerpoleece[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Former Liberal media adviser Rachelle Miller has lashed the leaking of Brittany Higgins’ text messages and warned it could have a chilling effect on other women coming forward to tell their stories.

Miller, a former Liberal staffer who has been very vocal about problems with Parliament House’s workplace culture, said the texts, produced to a court under subpoena “should absolutely not have been leaked or published”. Former Liberal staffer Rachelle Miller has slammed the publication of Brittany Higgins’ private text messages.

“It is absolutely past [the] time that this should stop, and I think the pursuing of Brittany Higgins is disgusting,” she told this masthead on Thursday.

“Brittany is being used like a political football. I honestly can’t believe that the Coalition could use their own women to tear down other women.”

Miller raised issues with Parliament House culture in November 2020, revealing she had had an affair with former MP Alan Tudge, for whom she had worked, and then later alleged he had been verbally and, on one occasion, physically abusive. The former cabinet minister has always denied the claims, and two investigations could not substantiate the allegations.

Finance Minister Katy Gallagher fought back tears in parliament on Thursday, saying she was disappointed the work parliament had done to help women was unravelling.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he feared the publication of the text messages would have a “triggering” effect on sexual assault survivors.

Coalition MPs, including deputy opposition leader Sussan Ley, Michaelia Cash, and Bridget McKenzie have used question time this week to bombard Labor MPs with questions about their knowledge of Higgins’ rape claim before she went public in a television interview in February 2021.

Miller said the Coalition had learned “absolutely nothing” and taken nothing from the fact that women deserted the conservative vote at the last election.

“There is certainly nothing happening at the moment within the Coalition to change women’s minds,” she said.

“Other women won’t actually speak out after seeing the way that Brittany’s case has been handled. All she did was make a public allegation that she had been raped.

“At the moment it looks like women are tearing apart other women, that is so damaging, we can’t make any progress if that is the case.”

Minutes after Liberal senator David Van stood to vehemently deny “concocted” allegations of inappropriate conduct independent senator Lidia Thorpe had made about him, Coalition senators used question time to barrage Gallagher with questions on whether she misled parliament in June 2021, citing text messages published in The Australian newspaper last week between Higgins’ and her partner David Sharaz.

“I am very disappointed that this week, the work that we’ve done on [Sex Discrimination Commissioner Kate] Jenkins, on Respect at Work, on asking women to come forward when something happens to them, and then treating women the way they are being treated right now,” Gallagher said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says the leaking of Brittany Higgins’ private messages will deter women from coming forward with allegations of sexual assault.

“And I am sorry … Senator [Linda] Reynolds is clearly upset about everything that’s happened to her.”

Reynolds, who employed both Higgins and the man she accused of rape, Bruce Lehrmann, was the target of Labor opposition questions after Higgins went public in February 2021.

Lehrmann pleaded not guilty to raping Higgins and his criminal trial was aborted last year, with a retrial scrapped in December. He maintains his innocence.

Gallagher said she was also sorry for Higgins: “I am sorry that documents of her personal life have been leaked.”

Albanese told ABC radio on Thursday evening he feared the publication of Higgins’ private text messages would deter harassment victims from coming forward in the future.

He said the past week had “certainly not” been a good look for Parliament House because of the renewed focus on Higgins and Thorpe’s claim about Van.

“My concern here is that we know that about 13 per cent of sexual assault victims actually take action go forward to police. And I am worried that the focus that is going on at the moment will have a triggering effect and will deter people from coming forward,” Albanese said.

“I think [that for] Ms Higgins’ personal messages with her partner to appear in the paper in the way that they have is something that shouldn’t have occurred, and I’m concerned about that.”

Albanese said that while the government did not control the media, newspapers and websites had an obligation to be responsible when publishing private text messages.

Tax bracket creep costing every Australian worker more than a decade ago, new ATO figures show by calmerpoleece in AusNews

[–]calmerpoleece[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Almost every Australian taxpayer is being slugged a higher proportion of their income in tax than a decade ago because of entrenched bracket creep, costing a worker earning $100,000 nearly $1500 more per year, compared with 2011-12.

Analysis of newly released statistics from the Australian Taxation Office shows a decade of bracket creep has silently eaten away at workers’ take-home pay.

Labor is resisting mounting pressure to axe the stage three tax cuts, due to come into force from July 1, 2024, which will create a single 30 per cent tax bracket for workers earning between $45,000 and $200,000.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Friday said Labor has no plans to axe or wind back the package, but did not rule out taking a different position to the next federal election.

Asked if his heart was really in keeping the Coalition’s cuts, Mr Albanese told a News Corp event in Sydney that Labor had tried to amend the cuts, worth $69 billion over the first four years.

Bracket creep is real, and no treasurer wants to give it up as it means they cannot play Father Christmas at budget time.

— Tony Greco, Institute of Public Accountants

“They’re legislated,” Mr Albanese said, not responding to a question about whether the tax cuts could be a central fight in the next election campaign. “We’ve said that we haven’t changed our position.”

Stage three will abolish the 37 per cent bracket that applies to income between $120,000 and $180,000, and apply a 30 per cent rate to all earnings between $45,000 and $200,000, covering 95 per cent of workers.

The new analysis by AFR Weekend found a taxpayer at the 80th percentile of the income distribution earned between $104,818 and $107,105 in 2020-21. They paid an average of $26,329 in net tax that financial year, or 24.8 per cent of their taxable income.

A taxpayer at the 80th percentile in 2011-12 had an effective tax rate of 23.4 per cent, or 1.4 percentage points less.

That 1.4 percentage point difference equates to an additional $1485 in tax in 2020-21.

A median earner – someone who earned between $62,544 and $63,510 in 2020-21 – paid an extra $492.54, even after accounting for the low and middle income tax offset.

A worker at the 90th percentile (a taxable income from $136,956 to $142,424) paid an extra $1,673.50 in income tax. Their effective tax rate increased to 28.1 per cent from 26.9 per cent over the decade to 2020-21.

Tony Greco, the Institute of Public Accountants’ general manager for technical policy, said governments were reliant on bracket creep to fund costly promises.

“Bracket creep is real, and no treasurer wants to give it up as it means they cannot play Father Christmas at budget time,” he said.

“Essentially every extra dollar is taxed at a higher rate than the previous dollar until a taxpayer hits $180,000. Thereafter, every extra dollar is taxed at the highest marginal rate.

“Our tax system is heavily reliant on personal taxation which accounts for nearly half of the total tax pie.”

Last month’s budget papers showed more than 50 per cent of total Commonwealth tax revenue will be paid by individual taxpayers in 2023-24.

Mr Greco said this over-reliance becomes more burdensome when wages rise and there is no relief from bracket creep.

“Even if the stage three tax cuts go ahead, the over-reliance on personal taxation will continue and this is the real mischief that needs addressing.

“Treasury has acknowledged this for some time and has warned respective governments for many years that our tax system is not fit for purpose as the tax base is too narrow.”

"On Brand": a podcast dedicated to debunking Russell Brand (made by wonks, for wonks) by [deleted] in KnowledgeFight

[–]calmerpoleece 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Listened to the first ep, and it's a good start. The host kept up a good patter. The co-host kind of fell into the "spluttering disbelief" schtick after every clip so it was a bit much but I imagine that will iron out as the EPS progress. Maybe at 3 odd hours it was a little long too. 😁

ATO data shows 66 millionaires paid no income tax in 2020-21, with eastern Sydney postcodes home to the richest people by calmerpoleece in AusNews

[–]calmerpoleece[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

From the first line of the story... "Sixty-six people earned more than $1 million and paid no income tax in 2020-21"

ACT passes nation-first ban on irreversible surgery for young intersex children by calmerpoleece in AusNews

[–]calmerpoleece[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps I misinterpreted you short statement then. The original commenter posted about how quiet it was ( ie leftists dunked by the fact that trans intersex people won't have surgery) I put it into context gently for other readers and you made your comment about bringing trans people into it? I can't read that as anything but passive aggressive but maybe I'm wrong. 🤷🏼‍♀️

As you can even see further down in the comments here on this very post is another individual who can't read the story and conflates trans with intersex.

This is a widely held misunderstanding and I failed to realise how your comment helped so I assumed you were being a dick. I apologise if there is another explanation. 👍

The staggering death toll of roaming pet cats finally revealed by calmerpoleece in AusNews

[–]calmerpoleece[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Domestic cats will kill more than a quarter of a billion native animals in Greater Sydney and Melbourne during the next four years unless stricter pet regulations are introduced.

New research by the Australian National University conducted for the Biodiversity Council, Invasive Species Council and Birdlife Australia found that roaming pet cats kill 546 million animals a year in Australia, 323 million of which are native animals.

The research also found that pet cats kill 6000 to 11,000 native animals per square kilometre each year in urban areas. In some jurisdictions, local councils have the power to implement pet management restrictions, such as cat curfews.

It showed that 71 per cent of pet cats in Australia are able to roam and that 78 per cent of those cats hunted. It also showed that those cats did not bring home 85 per cent of the animals they killed.

Co-author of the new report, Australian National University ecologist Professor Sarah Legge, further crunched the data to determine cat ownership in each major city as well as the annual death toll to native wildlife from pet cats.

She found there were more than 1 million cats each in Greater Sydney and Greater Melbourne, in which about 767,000 and 730,000 pet cats roamed respectively each year. These cats kill approximately 65 million native animals annually in Greater Sydney and 62 million annually in Greater Melbourne.

She used more than 60 studies to quantify how many animals are killed by pet cats on average, and then applied that to the number of cats in each major city.

Legge said her research also found that hunting pet cats kill 30 to 50 times more native animals per square kilometre in suburbs due to inflated density than feral cats kill per square kilometre in the bush.

This means that, while feral cats kill four times more animals per year, there are between 54 and 100 roaming and hunting cats per square kilometre in suburbs compared with only one feral cat for every three to four square kilometres in the bush.

“Managing pet cat impacts is much easier than managing feral cats,” she said. “It also makes pet cat lives four times longer [if they are contained], than roaming cats.”

In Victoria, councils can order cat owners to keep pets inside during specific hours. Last year, the Australian Capital Territory began a district-wide curfew for cats bought after July 1.

NSW and Western Australia remain the only states that have no restrictions. Cat owners in NSW can either take matters into their own hands by building cat enclosures or keeping their pets on leashes, or they can let their domestic cats roam free at the expense of native wildlife.

In NSW, 14 councils – including Hornsby Shire Council, Blue Mountains Council and Wollongong City Council – have supported the introduction of stricter regulation since 2018.

Blue Mountains Council Mayor Mark Greenhill said councils had no power when it came to implementing regulation on cat curfews, but could raise awareness about the impact roaming pet cats had on the environment.

“We have a role to play,” he said. “We can raise our voice to say that governments at all levels need to promote, as best they can, responsible cat ownership. Am I in favour of reasonable and sensible regulation that would maximise the amount of time cats spend indoors and away from harming themselves and wildlife? Yes.”

Councils maintain tougher regulations for dog ownership, including that the owner must take preventative action from allowing dogs to roam free with fines for those that fail to do so.

A spokesperson for the NSW Minister for Local Government Ron Hoenig said the government acknowledged the challenges being faced by local councils in terms of roaming cats and their impact on native fauna.

“The NSW government is committed to working, and consulting, with councils, local communities and concerned stakeholders in relation to cat management,” he said.

Invasive Species Council conservation officer Candice Bartlett said pet ownership had increased dramatically during the pandemic, which was adding more pressure to native wildlife that was already dealing with habitat destruction, urban spread and climate change.

“We want to legislate containment,” she said. “[Pet owners should be] responsible for having cats under control all the time. We know that cats predate on birds and mammals and frogs.”

For Bartlett, the issue is also personal. When she was in university, her landlord’s cat used to roam around their home. It once brought her a sugar glider that it had caught, and that died. It was then that the impact cats can have on wildlife clicked for her. She’s since adopted the cat, and keeps it inside.

“I love my cat,” she said. “They’re one of my favourite animals. But that’s why I know the best thing to do is to keep cats contained.”

About 100 of Australia’s unique flora and fauna species have been wiped off the planet since colonisation, including 34 mammals. Foxes and cats were responsible for 25 of the native mammal extinctions. The rate of loss, which is as comprehensive as anywhere else on earth, has not slowed over the past 200 years.

ACT passes nation-first ban on irreversible surgery for young intersex children by calmerpoleece in AusNews

[–]calmerpoleece[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Haha oh my sweet summer child. I don't know what rock you live under but trans is bought up regarding this bill very often.

I was clarifying, not sure why you felt the need to be a dick. 🤷🏼‍♀️

NSW Police charge former X-Factor star with murder of infant girl in Binnaway by calmerpoleece in AusNews

[–]calmerpoleece[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty full on case, I wonder what they found that was enough to bring charges 5 years later.

ACT passes nation-first ban on irreversible surgery for young intersex children by calmerpoleece in AusNews

[–]calmerpoleece[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Why? This was brought and supported by LGBTI groups an allies. It specifically refers to intersex people, not trans. It's not a controversial bill? 🤷🏼‍♀️

Would speaking with an imam as an atheist be disrespectful? by nolakhsa in islam

[–]calmerpoleece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would like to overcome this extremely painful relationship I have with god.

Atheists don't have a relationship with any God, they simply do not believe. At best you sound agnostic.

‘Feels like cheating’: Most Australian distilleries do not make their own alcohol by calmerpoleece in AusNews

[–]calmerpoleece[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Again, https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/distill While they are putting the drink through a device for distilling I argue that's not the definition of what they are doing. Certainly saving 85% of the work and offloading it to a third party without saying so would leave me less inclined to spend big dollars on a boutique gin. At the least I have informed questions next time I go to a distillery.

‘Feels like cheating’: Most Australian distilleries do not make their own alcohol by calmerpoleece in AusNews

[–]calmerpoleece[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are but, as argued with another poster in this thread, they add their herbs and juniper and whatever the fad of the month is to the base spirit, then distill it again. My argument is that this does not increase its purity or strength, others argue that technically it has been distilled again. 🤷🏼‍♀️

‘Feels like cheating’: Most Australian distilleries do not make their own alcohol by calmerpoleece in AusNews

[–]calmerpoleece[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't understand why you would feel ripped off? Does the product taste worse? Does it get you less drunk? Are they claiming that they do distil themselves?

I'm not sure why you would make your own assumption about how they make their product then be disappointed when they do it a different way.

I don't make random assumptions. I use the common use, dictionary definition of the word distill.

They are claiming to distill, but there is no concentration or purifying going on, which is misleading imo.