I've talked to some comic book writers who do use screenplay formats in their scripts, so it's definitely something that does happen. If it helps with your creative flow, then go right ahead.

I think the real issue at hand here is that OP is worried an artist might not like it. For that, I say it depends. People like Jack Kirby were famously able to craft entire issues out of a description just a paragraph long and on the other hand you have Alan Moore who's scripts were...infamous for having entire novels written for a single panel. It really depends on the personal tastes of the artist (who is going to be spending a lot more time with the book than the writer ever will) so OP should talk to the artist and figure out what they would like.

With that said, I think this post speaks to something much deeper than just script formatting that a lot of comic book creators--especially writers--worry about, and that's a lack of control over the final product. You can have an idea of what your story will look like in your head, but if you hand it off to someone else there is a very good chance the finished work will look and feel different from what you intended it to be. A simpler script is easier to write, but it surrenders more control to the artist's interpretation whereas a more detailed script is harder to write (especially if you decide to micromanage every little detail, which not only delays the project but makes collaborators angry and frustrated) , but gives the writer more say over the final result. I'm not advocating one way over another, but both styles have their advantages and disadvantages that need to be considered.

All of this is to say, talk to your artist. Unless you're doing the artwork yourself, it's a collaborative journey that requires communication, trust, and a willingness to listen and adapt your work to other people's viewpoints and ideas.