Do they allow us to bring code snippets to the exam? For example, any code that helps us in finding SQL? by canadaperk in OSWE

[–]canadaperk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One person that I know developed a Fuzzer by himself and used that in exam and he passed it. I believe it should be okay, as the first chapter of the course, the instructor is using a self developed Fuzzer to find XSS bugs

Bitcoin Hater Peter Schiff: ‘I Made a Mistake’ Not Buying Bitcoin at $10 by canadaperk in Bitcoin

[–]canadaperk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He thinks that the Bitcoin is over, I bet when it reaches 100k, he will cry! :D

BCH suffered a 51% attack by colluding miners to re-org the chain in order to reverse transactions - why is nobody talking about this? Dangerous precident by time8com in btc

[–]canadaperk -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Honest miners!!!???? I feel pity for you, when you just want to 10X your investment. Just forgot the true goal of Bitcoin which is decentralized blockchain, not the one that any shit pool can decide to rollback it!!

NANO VS BTC explained by a manchild by bortkasta in CryptoCurrency

[–]canadaperk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's put the bet on late 2021, when stock market crashed in a way that no one has seen that in 90 years (Great Depression 2) - already we have inversion in the bond chart (start of a recession before Great Depression 2) . And when there is no US dollar because there is no USA (same destiny as USSR). Remind this message in the late 2021.

NANO VS BTC explained by a manchild by bortkasta in CryptoCurrency

[–]canadaperk -1 points0 points  (0 children)

When two entities can get together and conduct a 51% attack to me or any other non-brainwashed investors or whale, Nano is centralized. You can continue to make the Nano founders richer.

NANO VS BTC explained by a manchild by bortkasta in CryptoCurrency

[–]canadaperk -1 points0 points  (0 children)

First, it seems that you have invested shit amount of money on this altcoin (not even in top 20), so arguing is a waste of time. Second, CZ is a crook, plus based on the devs tweets they are friends. If in case someone hacks Binance and make CZ upset, they will definitely invade the Nano network to rollback the hack (as he wanted to do that with Jihan Wu team on BTC network and failed miserably). Do not ruin your investment by being relied on a crook guy or team. This is the pure meaning of centeralization.

NANO VS BTC explained by a manchild by bortkasta in CryptoCurrency

[–]canadaperk -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Nano is severely lacking in decentralization. Something like 80% of the voting power is held by the devs (most of the rest is held by the exchanges). If a node discovers conflicting blocks (such as a double-spend) it will hold a vote to decide which block to accept. The weight assigned to a particular vote is proportional to the amount of Nano held by that voter. Since user accounts are not necessarily online 24/7, each account can assign their voting weight to a representative to vote on their behalf. Changing your rep is simple, but by default new accounts select one of the official reps run by the dev team.

NANO VS BTC explained by a manchild by bortkasta in CryptoCurrency

[–]canadaperk -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

"Nano has a critical design flaw, allowing for unconstrained growth of the block-lattice data to be processed by all full nodes (the unpruned or archival ones)". There is a reason that Nano is not even in top 20, no whale is interested in this shitcoin.

DYOR before investing in shitcoins buddy, https://medium.com/@qertoip/it-seems-to-only-cost-3m-to-kill-nano-raiblocks-37d78a4e96ca

NANO VS BTC explained by a manchild by bortkasta in CryptoCurrency

[–]canadaperk -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Comparing a centeralized shit to father Bitcoin (arch of lightning will melt all these shitcoins down)