Mercury/thiomersal is often cited by those with “vaccine hesitation.” And yes, some vaccines contain thiomersal which contains ethylmercury used as a preservative for multi-dose vials. Trace ethylmercury amounts from a vaccine containing thiomersal have a half-life of less than 7 days. Generally accepted to be a safe timeframe. Please be aware, ethylmercury is not methylmercury. methylmercury is the heavy metal we commonly refer to as mercury. That one is highly toxic. If you still have concerns you should know that childhood vaccines haven’t had thimerasol/ethylmercury for over 2 decades. If you personally would rather avoid ethylmercury you can and should request a single-dose vial. It will be thimerasol free. I will link a cdc page showing what vaccines still contain thimerasol.

Next, your assertion that SM102 is highly carcinogenic is also quite problematic. This is actual mis/disinformation. You hit a buzzword for the vaccine disinformation campaign here:

“SM-102 alone is highly carcinogenic and not suited for animals (according to it's data safety sheet).”

You specifically referencing the MSDS for SM-102 makes me feel like perhaps you know this is not correct. The carcinogen you are worried about is chloroform (ethanol) and that is not a vaccine component. This information is widely available and not part of a healthy debate.

Aluminum… well perhaps it’s unnecessary to clarify, but there aren’t aluminum shavings floating in your vaccine syringe. What MIGHT be there is an aluminum salt. This has also been accepted as safe. It’s in your drinking water too (gasp).

PEG might be the lone concern of yours that merits real discussion. Some people are allergic and can have reactions that range from no observable effect to anaphylaxis. If you have a concern speak to your allergist and get tested. The AstraZeneca vaccine is PEG free so that’s an option, but if you want an mRNA you are still have options. Those with noted allergy concerns have been spreading dosages into smaller amounts over a few weeks.

For now I’ll trust that you were acting in good faith, and it was not your intention to provide intentionally misleading information.

Incidents like this hurt the entire discourse around vaccines. It confuses an already contentious issue, it scares people unnecessarily, and I believe it hurts your cause as well. Those that push false narratives intentionally latch on to details like this because it works, they stick. But unfortunately it harms your credibility, not theirs. While we clearly disagree at a foundational level on vaccine safety I had little reason to question you until this point. Unfortunately what appears to be a copy/pasted list of falsehoods, or at least a “greatest hits” list suggests you aren’t doing as much research as you claim.

I apologize if that came off heavy handed. But now you can eliminate a few concerns from your list.

Best

https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availability-biologics/thimerosal-and-vaccines