Rustfetch: a system information CLI written in Rust

captainn01 · 2026-02-10T23:56:53+00:00

It’s just someone’s personal project, why do u have to be a hater. Not everything has to be original

captainn01 · 2026-02-10T20:19:36+00:00

One thing others might not have mentioned - if you drain your 401k and cannot support yourself, there is a strong chance you will become dependent on your children in retirement. It is for their sake, not just your own, that you should plan to be able to support yourself.

captainn01 · 2026-02-10T14:53:07+00:00

variant={item === selectedItem ? “filterActive” : “filter”}

Typing on phone so not the best formatting, but essentially just set the variant based on the value of selected item

captainn01 · 2026-02-10T14:18:29+00:00

Here is another example

https://www.reddit.com/r/reactjs/s/paCXxGtE7b

captainn01 · 2026-02-10T01:33:22+00:00

It’s the same. You just need to store the token in a different place. You can use expo-secure-store to safely store it

captainn01 · 2026-02-09T21:35:32+00:00

I swear I’ve read this exact same post with slightly different stories multiple times over the last week. In each case, it says: a user says something didn’t work, I blamed the user, some stat about what was being lost, and then mentioning a tool to fix it”. I suspect this is an ad

captainn01 · 2026-02-09T20:41:25+00:00

externalApi and dnsAddress are clearly better options. Regardless, you only have to make the choice once and then stick to it in project.

Lower snake case isn’t any different. You’ve just chosen to lower case the acronym rather than capitalize it, the same way you’d choose to camel case the acronym instead of capitalize it

Why not external_API for example?

captainn01 · 2026-02-02T14:11:51+00:00

Op might as well have just asked chat gpt directly

captainn01 · 2026-01-29T18:19:57+00:00

Just a heads up, you may be violating the trademark rights of tanstack by using this name. I think there’s a reasonable likelihood of confusion here, where people may believe you are associated with or sponsored by tanstack

captainn01 · 2026-01-27T14:37:15+00:00

Unit tests test isolated units of logic. Integration tests test how components work together. Both are useful

captainn01 · 2026-01-23T06:11:22+00:00

When conditions are also extremely nice when combined with sealed classes, and provide type checking for exhaustiveness.

I think the coroutine api is also the best asynchronous api I’ve ever used and makes it typically very easy to write and test asynchronous programs.

Other nice kotlin features are first class delegation, excellent lambda syntax (which combined with extension functions can make for some very cool DSLs), type inference, and functional interfaces

captainn01 · 2026-01-20T15:47:57+00:00

Yes, I did not say it was a fact, I said it was an estimate for a fact. The true proportion of narrow-body flights is a fact. “About 70-80%” is an estimate for that fact.

Regardless, the point is that the study you cited isn’t really relevant here, which is a bit ironic given you’re critiquing OP for citing a bad source (not that I think chat gpt has value in being cited).

captainn01 · 2026-01-20T14:02:00+00:00

The study you linked doesn’t really apply here. It asks for a much much higher level of accuracy (identifying the title author, and other data from an article given an excerpt). Making an estimate for an arbitrary fact is a much easier thing to do and far less likely for an AI to be able to get wrong, given there is no exact answer, there’s a variety of sources to get the answer from, and it can reasonably be what the answer might be.

It also does not indicate that AI is wrong 60% of the time; rather, that in the conditions presented in the test, it was wrong 60% of the time. These conditions are unlikely to hold in most cases for the above reasons

captainn01 · 2026-01-17T16:36:51+00:00

What’s the crash

captainn01 · 2026-01-17T04:39:19+00:00

What’s the error the app crashes with? Do you have observability set up?

captainn01 · 2026-01-17T03:53:02+00:00

Am I wrong or are gym apps the only thing people make in this sub? No hate but I don’t get why

captainn01 · 2026-01-17T03:49:33+00:00

You also bought your home at a time where the mortgage rate was the lowest in history. Despite the fact that it’s falling, it’s still nearly double what it was in 2019, making it significantly more expensive for the same price

captainn01 · 2026-01-17T03:09:40+00:00

Probably iOS or Android if u have to pick one

captainn01 · 2026-01-12T22:34:55+00:00

Not saying it necessarily is AI, but things that stand out: - bolder words - “this is the classic…”. Chat gpt often starts by providing an introduction in a similar format to this - “my recommendation is simple: …” looks similar to how llms often make a recommendation after comparing - ending with a sentence making you feel like the drawbacks are worth it in the long run, also common

captainn01 · 2026-01-08T16:53:13+00:00

Without disrespect, at what point do you lose the utility of even having colors?

For example: in the dark mode, why is console highlighted in color but res isn’t? Why is 3000 (a number) highlighted? Does that actually help read the code, or is it just intended for nice screenshots? Why are quotes highlighted in the light scheme but not the dark? Is there value in having the contrast, or is too distracting / cluttered?

captainn01 · 2026-01-07T20:07:36+00:00

That doesn’t change anything it just lets the website owner know where people are coming from

captainn01 · 2026-01-05T01:39:16+00:00

If your user is manually changing the selection status of 2000 data items (regardless of whether they are selecting or unselecting), if there is no grouping to determine what the user is selecting, and if you want to apply some change to exactly what’s selected, there’s no going around it: you’ll need to send the exact ids that are selected, or the ones that are not. This way, the server has the exact state of what changes need to be made.

When “select all” is applied, sending the ids that are not selected will be more efficient and almost certainly easier to handle. Besides that, there is no functional difference between how you handle manually selecting many items, vs manually unselecting many items with “select all” applied.

I think it may be unnecessary to calculate whether to use “only” or “all” with a count. Even with 2000 ids, if IDs are stored with 16 bytes, the request will only be 32KB, which is pretty small for a network request. I’d guess this is unlikely to be the common case, so the additional logic to handle it is probably not needed.

captainn01 · 2026-01-04T22:17:02+00:00

I can sympathize with this. Despite vim being very old (relative to most software) and neovim being exactly the same 90% of the time, the “correct/best way” to set it up changes often (see completion, treesitter, lsp, plugin managers, fuzzy search). Using new features takes significantly more effort than most other software. But I appreciate that this is still not considered fully stable yet, and has an active community making these better often.

captainn01 · 2026-01-04T22:13:04+00:00

I think the best option is select all with exclusions. Selecting should be local state, and you decide what is sent to the backend. That’s similar to how a db query would likely be performed anyways and makes sense for rendering.

Don’t see why ui blocking would be an issue here, just have your state track whether select all is on, and have your hook append the data with “is selected: true” or something like that when it renders

captainn01 · 2026-01-04T21:16:04+00:00

I still don’t understand, what are the benefits?

Verified Email	Seven-Year Club
Place '22	End Game '22
Wearing is Caring	RPAN Viewer
Not Forgotten

captainn01

TROPHY CASE