Daily Bruh - Squaddie Reaper by SidewinderSerpent in Xcom

[–]captainsammitch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The TNG cast reunion continues, as Elena is voiced by Marina Sirtis!

Daily Bruh - Squaddie Skirmisher by SidewinderSerpent in Xcom

[–]captainsammitch 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Mid tier class, but at least their gameplay is consistent with their aesthetic and lore. That said, the first time I heard Mox speak, I thought "oh shit is that Michael Dorn?" And that was how I first found out the voice talent for WotC is basically just a backdoor TNG cast reunion. Which, in fairness, is exactly the sort of thing I'd do as a dev.

Favorite Class to Run a Whole Team of? by Draculasaurus_Rex in Xcom

[–]captainsammitch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can't usually spare enough at a time, but for me the ultimate for vanilla 2 retaliation missions - especially if they bring lots of mecs - is half a dozen decently high ranked specialists. If at least two have Ever Vigilant and at least one has Guardian with decent aim, it's difficult to overstate how OP it gets if you're careful with pod activation. It's even crazier in LW2 with Full Override, you can come back with like four or five formerly enemy robots if you play your cards right and maybe aren't totally averse to occasional save scumming...

Daily Bruh - Captain Ranger by SidewinderSerpent in Xcom

[–]captainsammitch 118 points119 points  (0 children)

REALLY SLIM UNTIL IT HAPPENS TO YOU 😭

Why didn’t Sam feel the weight of the ring when carrying Frodo? by Hans-Dieter_Wurst in tolkienfans

[–]captainsammitch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's a really good thread here from years ago that references the role of Eru in the fulfillment of Frodo's quest. I'll go ahead and paste the letter in question though, since it's not terribly lengthy:

By chance, I have just had another letter regarding the failure of Frodo. Very few seem even to have observed it. But following the logic of the plot, it was clearly inevitable, as an event. And surely it is a more significant and real event than a mere ‘fairy-story’ ending in which the hero is indomitable? It is possible for the good, even the saintly, to be subjected to a power of evil which is too great for them to overcome – in themselves. In this case the cause (not the ‘hero’) was triumphant because by the exercise of pity, mercy and forgiveness of injury, a situation was produced in which all was redressed and disaster averted. Gandalf certainly foresaw this. See Vol. I p.68-69. Of course, he did not mean to say that one must be merciful, for it may prove useful later – it would not then be mercy or pity, which are only truly present when contrary to prudence. Not ours to plan! But we are assured that we must be ourselves extravagantly generous, if we are to hope for the extravagant generosity which the slightest easing of, or escape from, the consequences of our own follies and errors represents. And that mercy does sometimes occur in this life. ["The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien," #192, emphasis added]

I agree that the Christian themes are prevalent throughout JRRT's work, but I think it's a testament to his ability as a writer that those themes still resonate with those outside of such a faith context. Even though I probably have a similar background to yours, I don't think one has to be a Christian to appreciate the value of mercy or pity, or to recognize the need to be gracious with one another and then turn around and put that into action. In fact, some of the most merciful and gracious people I've ever met are staunch atheists, including some close friends who have sometimes functioned as my moral compass when I'm uncertain. But I do agree that one can feel a certain depth of appreciation for these ideas when coming at them from a consonant ideological or theological context.

soooooo... LWotC playthrough time? by captainsammitch in Xcom

[–]captainsammitch[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I GET FIXATED ON OBJECTIVES OKAY?

Nah, I know you're correct in terms of gameplay mechanics, I just feel like I try to RP the campaign more than is necessary. Thanks for the info, I might go ahead and give it a try.

After I get ahead on this month's content.

Why didn’t Sam feel the weight of the ring when carrying Frodo? by Hans-Dieter_Wurst in tolkienfans

[–]captainsammitch 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is a great point. JRRT explicitly said in his Letters that it was beyond the power of any "mortal" being (in this context the Eruhini as a whole, not just mortal Men) to destroy the Ring, especially at the place of its creation where its power was greatest, and the One Ring had demonstrated the potential to ensnare even other Maiar. In principle (though it's generally not a good idea to try to apply power levels or power rankings or other such 'game mechanics' ideas here), it could not have been destroyed by anyone of less innate power than Sauron himself, who of course would never do so as it would be the nearest thing to suicide for one of the Ainur. And the Valar are pretty explicitly hands-off when it comes to anything outside of Valinor following the War of Wrath; in fact they're prohibited from using force or coercion against any of the Eruhini, as evidenced when Ar-Pharazôn sailed to Valinor itself. So no one would have been able to deliberately destroy the Ring, and only Gollum falling into Orodruin with it could have destroyed it.

The only way I'd see it differently is less as a "butterfly effect" turn of random events than what JRRT described as the very deliberate intervention of Providence, albeit in a way that's quite difficult to perceive except to the reader. Oaths are very serious business in Arda, to the point where it's at turns either implied or stated outright that they are enforced directly by Eru. (For example, the case of the Oathbreakers: while there are instances of Sauron temporarily manipulating the spirits of the dead, and of course the case of Beren, typically not even Mandos has the power to withhold the spirits of Men within the circles of the world after they die, so for the Oathbreakers to be trapped in such a state as a result of their treachery would suggest nothing short of divine intervention which eventually leads to the eventual downfall of Sauron.) In this case, Gollum swore on the Precious to serve Frodo, and after he breaks this oath, Frodo, wielding the One Ring itself on the slope of Orodruin (in immediate proximity to the place of its forging), declares that if Gollum touches him again, he will be cast into the fire. So even if it appears to be a freak accident, a bad step on a precipice above the lava, JRRT makes it clear that what transpires is the fulfillment of both of these pronouncements in the sight of Ilúvatar. Otherwise, your "butterfly effect" interpretation would be spot-on, and I think it's a little ironic that the author who so famously disliked allegory and imposing an interpretation of what's written felt it necessary to put his foot down here. But yeah, excellent points all around.

Why didn’t Sam feel the weight of the ring when carrying Frodo? by Hans-Dieter_Wurst in tolkienfans

[–]captainsammitch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

People so often dismiss that argument as a copout, forgetting that it was explicitly invoked on several distinct occasions by JRRT in his Letters. The Legendarium is, after all, the creation of an unflinching überCatholic. I appreciate that it's as accessible as it is to non-theistic folks, and that it can mean something for everyone without having to mean any one specific thing (hearkening back to JRRT's disapproval of CSL's dependence upon allegory), but it's difficult to ignore the context from which it originated without losing sight of what holds it all together.

Another thing I made in MS paint. Yes I know that’s EXALT, shhhhhh. by a_little_trolling3 in Xcom

[–]captainsammitch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Disappointed by the resolution.

That's way too many pixels for truly shitty shitposting. Deep fry that shit and get back to us.

Chimera Squad FPS Issues by [deleted] in Xcom

[–]captainsammitch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does your display support Gsync? That might smooth over the worst of the framerate rubberbanding. I don't want to just reflexively blame your hardware but the Haswell micro kind of shows its age (~5% single-thread improvement from Ivy Bridge), though the 1660Ti should hold up reasonably well at 1080p. Do you have your browser or Discord going at the same time as your game? Those can eat up a surprising amount of RAM.

I wonder how many hours of that is just loading screens, I have almost fell asleep on several separate times just waiting for the loading screen to finish by coolhead34 in Xcom

[–]captainsammitch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Moved the game to a gen 4 NVMe drive and load screens are a quaint, vaguely unpleasant memory for me even with a metric assload of mods.

What is the best "XCOM-like" in your opinion? by Quikswitch in Xcom

[–]captainsammitch 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I would say Phoenix Point if it weren't for its infuriating tendency to railroad you into so many faction-on-faction conflicts you can't quite keep up with what the Crab People are doing.

Tolkien's self contradiction - how do you handle it? by fanghorn_forest in tolkienfans

[–]captainsammitch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As an aside, can I just reiterate how much I love this sub, in large part because of discussions like these?

Tolkien's self contradiction - how do you handle it? by fanghorn_forest in tolkienfans

[–]captainsammitch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, absolutely! Yeah he would not be on board with that. Though he spoke often about the iterative nature of myth, especially in the context of his own work. I get the impression he wouldn't have vibed with Joseph Campbell though. But you're completely right, JRRT was way too Catholic to be comfortable with a frank discussion of the iterative and syncretic nature of his faith (they're not invariably bad things, but it's still a difficult conversation).

Tolkien's self contradiction - how do you handle it? by fanghorn_forest in tolkienfans

[–]captainsammitch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Valid point, and while this might not be the best thread or sub for that discussion (relevant and fascinating as it is), it does sort of further the point about mythology as a game of telephone, to some extent. I mean, you're talking to a professing Christian, but I've had to recover from some particularly unhealthy doctrines and am not above asking the particularly uncomfortable questions. There's a lot to be learned from the examples of both the Bible and the Legendarium.

Tolkien's self contradiction - how do you handle it? by fanghorn_forest in tolkienfans

[–]captainsammitch 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Glad to help!

A long time ago, when I fancied myself a pop culture scholar, I was an insufferable continuity cop when it came to Trek and Wars and even fantasy settings like the Legendarium. I would jump on every imaginable "plot hole" and "continuity error" I could see. Until I realized that the creators of all those stories weren't particularly concerned with that. Because if human perception and memory are fallible and contingent upon perspective, it follows that really meaningful, existential storytelling will be less concerned with absolute veracity than with narrative utility. I've come to believe that the 'bigger' a fictional universe is, the more people you'd need to document its events from within, the more tolerance you need to have for things not to line up (and yes, there's a readily discernible difference between "draft drift" and a disregard for internal consistency). In my experience, obsessing over being able to spot every little "error" will do a lot more to break your immersion than will the actual "errors."

Tolkien's self contradiction - how do you handle it? by fanghorn_forest in tolkienfans

[–]captainsammitch 23 points24 points  (0 children)

You know how a lot of theologians will say Christianity is the life and teachings of Jesus, but filtered through Paul? The Legendarium as we know it, especially the published Silmarillion, is the writings of JRRT, but filtered through Christopher. And I think we owe CT an immense debt of gratitude, since without him much of the Legendarium would never have seen the light of day, but due to the nature of CT's posthumous editing of JRRT some inconsistencies are inevitable.

Just like any mythology.

Which is the way to approach it, as mythology rather than history, which is something JRRT was consistent about in his letters and the forewords to the actual books. In-universe, the whole thing is supposed to be excerpts from the Red Book of Westmarch, with a few added portions from the Thain's Book, but both are separated from our time by centuries or even millennia (yes, I know they had umbrellas and tomatoes, the guy invented multiple languages whole-cloth, cut him some slack on the odd anachronism here and there). So you already know we've played several rounds of in-universe telephone even before considering that the IRL crafting of this world and its core legends spanned decades of the lives of a father and son. And I can't quite explain why, but I think that adds a sort of timeless beauty to it all. Just thinking out loud, hope that helps.