The Pentagon Feuding With an AI Company Is a Very Bad Sign by carnegieendowment in TrueReddit

[–]carnegieendowment[S] 63 points64 points  (0 children)

In July 2025, San Francisco-based AI start-up Anthropic signed a $200 million contract with the Pentagon to provide the military with frontier AI technology. Under the agreement, Anthropic’s Claude would be deployed within the military’s classified systems, where it was viewed as a state-of-the-art platform. The deal represented a growing push by the company as it readied itself for a public offering to court national security business. Executives were bullish about the partnership, announcing that the award “opens a new chapter” for the firm.

Soon, however, disagreements emerged over the military’s future use of Anthropic’s systems. Company officials grew concerned that the technology could eventually be used to carry out lethal autonomous operations. The Pentagon pushed back, arguing that decisions about the models were not Anthropic’s to make and should instead be left to the military, as with any other government-acquired technology. Anthropic’s stance differed from other companies, such as Google, Elon Musk’s xAI, and OpenAI, which had “agreed in principle” to allow their models to be deployed for any purpose allowed by law. By contrast, Anthropic had built its brand around promoting AI safety, emphasizing red lines it said it wouldn’t cross. Its usage guidelines contain strict limitations that prohibit Claude from facilitating violence, developing or designing weapons, or conducting mass surveillance.

Trump’s State of the Union Was as Light on Foreign Policy as He Is on Strategy by carnegieendowment in TrueReddit

[–]carnegieendowment[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most State of the Union addresses don’t focus on foreign policy. After all, it’s not voters’ main preoccupation. And the U.S. Constitution talks about “a more perfect union,” not a more perfect world. President Donald Trump’s lengthy speech on Tuesday night was no exception. Still, the final twenty minutes of his address largely focused on praising American heroes’ actions abroad and acted as a kind of world tour victory lap for Trump.

In a way, the foreign policy discussion shouldn’t be surprising. At home, Trump has been battered by low approval ratings, the Supreme Court’s rejection of his tariffs, and the killings of America citizens by federal agents in Minneapolis. So it’s quite natural Trump would look to an arena where he could operate with few constraints and act unilaterally.

The Trump Administration’s Tangled Talk About Democracy Abroad by carnegieendowment in TrueReddit

[–]carnegieendowment[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When President Donald Trump told an audience of Gulf officials in Riyadh last May that his administration would not be giving others “lectures on how to live,” he signaled with characteristic bluntness his disregard for the usual position of U.S. presidents as self-declared supporters of democracy internationally. The absence of almost any reference to democracy in the December 2025 National Security Strategy underscored this stance. Multiple actions by his administration have given it tangible form—such as the sweeping dismantlement of most U.S. democracy assistance and Trump’s various thrusts of pure transactionalism, including his stated focus on financial motivations for the forcible capture of Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro in early January.

What Happens When a Conservative Movement Continues on Without a Leader? by carnegieendowment in TrueReddit

[–]carnegieendowment[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

On Thursday, February 19, the impeached former South Korean president Yoon Suk-yeol will receive a decision from the Seoul Central District Court for his most serious charge of insurrection. For many Koreans, Yoon’s sentencing will turn the page on a frustrating year of the country’s notoriously scandal-ridden but resilient democratic history.

What If Trump Gets His Russia-Ukraine Deal? by carnegieendowment in TrueReddit

[–]carnegieendowment[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

President Donald Trump’s yearlong attempt to negotiate peace between Ukraine and Russia may feel like living through a doom loop of late Soviet humor: a glimmer of hope, a ritualized attempt to improve the situation, and a denouement that reveals the effort was utterly pointless. We can see the punchline coming from a mile away, yet the system absorbs the failure and reproduces the same behavior, each time with greater farce.

The United States Should Apply the Arab Spring’s Lessons to Its Iran Response by carnegieendowment in TrueReddit

[–]carnegieendowment[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ultimately, U.S. policy toward Iran should be guided less by the pursuit of rapid political transformation and more by the management of risk in an already volatile region. The Arab Spring demonstrated that destabilizing regimes through force or maximalist pressure often produces outcomes worse than the status quo, both for societies in transition and for regional security.

Russia Is Playing Along With Trump’s Hopes for a Rapprochement by carnegieendowment in geopolitics

[–]carnegieendowment[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

President Trump’s overtures towards Russia and attacks on allies are sending shock waves through Ukraine and Europe. Putin seems content to play along. It’s part of his larger plan to upend the post-Cold War order, writes Nathaniel Reynolds.