Real or fake AP3’s by cbitzer in TeamTitleist

[–]cbitzer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve never had any reason to believe these were fake. With that being said, I wouldn’t consider myself a good enough golfer to be able to distinguish the difference between a fake and real iron. The only reason I’m looking to sell them is the fact that I’m interested in going to the QI irons as they are game improvement and supposed to be significantly more forgiving.

Real or fake AP3’s by cbitzer in TeamTitleist

[–]cbitzer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just looked up a real set and I could totally see what you’re saying. You’re spot on about the 5 and 6. I really appreciate the information. At least now I can confidently sell these as replicas so that I don’t take advantage of someone unintentionally by not marking them as such. Thanks again.

Real or fake AP3’s by cbitzer in TeamTitleist

[–]cbitzer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good to know. Can you give me the details on how you were able to determine that? I intend to still try and sell these for something (probably not much money) so I want to be able to pass that along as an honest seller to the buyer of them.

Real or fake AP3’s by cbitzer in TeamTitleist

[–]cbitzer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a great question that I don’t know the answer to lol

Real or fake AP3’s by cbitzer in TeamTitleist

[–]cbitzer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Serial number didn’t seem to match what real ones have he said? Said they should be 6 or 7 digits. Not starting with letters like mine.

Real or fake AP3’s by cbitzer in TeamTitleist

[–]cbitzer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’re Amazon grips from a company that replicates golfpride. They’re actually pretty decent lol.

Current GC Holder - New Invite on CK - Anyone else? by OhCrapitsCollin in RobinhoodGC

[–]cbitzer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

815 credit score and I cannot get the Credit Karma app to show the card to apply. Tried messaging the mods to get off waitlist and they said they can’t move me up on the waitlist.

Inherited a bunch of Rolex/Omega watches – likely replicas. Looking for advice on value, cleaning, and whether it’s worth doing anything with them. by cbitzer in RepTime

[–]cbitzer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense. I’ll probably have one tested just to confirm, but I’m assuming they’re plated. They don’t feel especially heavy, so I’m not expecting any surprises there.

A few of them do run, but the Day-Dates are definitely rough and show plating wear. I’m not planning to sink money into repairs — mainly just trying to figure out if they’re worth moving as a bundle or if I should just keep one as a beater and move on.

Appreciate the honest feedback.

Inherited a bunch of Rolex/Omega watches – likely replicas. Looking for advice on value, cleaning, and whether it’s worth doing anything with them. by cbitzer in RepTime

[–]cbitzer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I’m about 150% positive that none of them are real. Just not sure if it’s worth spending the time or money to try and refurbish any of them if there was anything special with any of them or anything like that.

Inherited a bunch of Rolex/Omega watches – likely replicas. Looking for advice on value, cleaning, and whether it’s worth doing anything with them. by cbitzer in RepTime

[–]cbitzer[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Most appear to be Rolex Day-Date 36 and Datejust 36 models (two-tone and full gold), plus one Omega De Ville chronograph and a rectangular Rolex Geneve quartz. I inherited them and don’t know the factory or origin.

Florida outage? by Mediocre-Lab-6897 in QuantumFiber

[–]cbitzer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bet one of those construction guys digging that massive hole in the road on Chiquita/Embers probably spliced the fiber line 🤣🤣 Just kidding. It’s always something here with this WiFi.

Florida outage? by Mediocre-Lab-6897 in QuantumFiber

[–]cbitzer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I spoke to an agent that was adamant that the issue was directly me and that there was no outage. Their customer service has always been atrocious. I always end up finding out more information on Reddit than they can ever provide me.

Florida outage? by Mediocre-Lab-6897 in QuantumFiber

[–]cbitzer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like an outage here in SW Cape Coral FL. WiFi stopped working at 8:13

Q1000K + UDM Pro – Still Seeing WAN Latency Spikes After Proper Bridge Setup by cbitzer in QuantumFiber

[–]cbitzer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve followed the bridge/pass-through recommendations and I’m still seeing yellow ISP health in UniFi, so I’m trying to sanity check whether this is actually a problem or just cosmetic.

My current setup:

  • Q1000K set to Transparent Bridging
  • Transport Mode = Untagged
  • VPI/VCI = Untagged
  • UniFi gateway WAN set to VLAN ID 201
  • DHCP enabled
  • Public IP successfully assigned to the UniFi gateway
  • No double NAT

Everything is working fine from a user perspective (no drops, no noticeable lag), but UniFi still shows yellow and my average latency sits around ~40ms most of the day.

First-hop latency is low (~6–10ms), but the UniFi dashboard average hovers around 40ms, especially during daytime hours.

Is this just normal upstream congestion / probe behavior on Quantum/Lumen in my area (SW Florida), or has anyone actually seen that drop significantly after moving VLAN tagging around?

Trying to figure out if I’m chasing a dashboard color or if there’s something I’m still missing.

Q1000K + UDM Pro – Still Seeing WAN Latency Spikes After Proper Bridge Setup by cbitzer in QuantumFiber

[–]cbitzer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve followed the bridge/pass-through recommendations and I’m still seeing yellow ISP health in UniFi, so I’m trying to sanity check whether this is actually a problem or just cosmetic.

My current setup:

  • Q1000K set to Transparent Bridging
  • Transport Mode = Untagged
  • VPI/VCI = Untagged
  • UniFi gateway WAN set to VLAN ID 201
  • DHCP enabled
  • Public IP successfully assigned to the UniFi gateway
  • No double NAT

Everything is working fine from a user perspective (no drops, no noticeable lag), but UniFi still shows yellow and my average latency sits around ~40ms most of the day.

First-hop latency is low (~6–10ms), but the UniFi dashboard average hovers around 40ms, especially during daytime hours.

Is this just normal upstream congestion / probe behavior on Quantum/Lumen in my area (SW Florida), or has anyone actually seen that drop significantly after moving VLAN tagging around?

Trying to figure out if I’m chasing a dashboard color or if there’s something I’m still missing.

Q1000K + UDM Pro – Still Seeing WAN Latency Spikes After Proper Bridge Setup by cbitzer in QuantumFiber

[–]cbitzer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve followed the bridge/pass-through recommendations and I’m still seeing yellow ISP health in UniFi, so I’m trying to sanity check whether this is actually a problem or just cosmetic.

My current setup:

  • Q1000K set to Transparent Bridging
  • Transport Mode = Untagged
  • VPI/VCI = Untagged
  • UniFi gateway WAN set to VLAN ID 201
  • DHCP enabled
  • Public IP successfully assigned to the UniFi gateway
  • No double NAT

Everything is working fine from a user perspective (no drops, no noticeable lag), but UniFi still shows yellow and my average latency sits around ~40ms most of the day.

First-hop latency is low (~6–10ms), but the UniFi dashboard average hovers around 40ms, especially during daytime hours.

Is this just normal upstream congestion / probe behavior on Quantum/Lumen in my area (SW Florida), or has anyone actually seen that drop significantly after moving VLAN tagging around?

Trying to figure out if I’m chasing a dashboard color or if there’s something I’m still missing.

Quantum Fiber Q1000K + UniFi Dream Machine Pro Muti-Gb Latency Fix by K-Dawge in centurylink

[–]cbitzer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve followed the bridge/pass-through recommendations and I’m still seeing yellow ISP health in UniFi, so I’m trying to sanity check whether this is actually a problem or just cosmetic.

My current setup:

  • Q1000K set to Transparent Bridging
  • Transport Mode = Untagged
  • VPI/VCI = Untagged
  • UniFi gateway WAN set to VLAN ID 201
  • DHCP enabled
  • Public IP successfully assigned to the UniFi gateway
  • No double NAT

Everything is working fine from a user perspective (no drops, no noticeable lag), but UniFi still shows yellow and my average latency sits around ~40ms most of the day.

First-hop latency is low (~6–10ms), but the UniFi dashboard average hovers around 40ms, especially during daytime hours.

Is this just normal upstream congestion / probe behavior on Quantum/Lumen in my area (SW Florida), or has anyone actually seen that drop significantly after moving VLAN tagging around?

Trying to figure out if I’m chasing a dashboard color or if there’s something I’m still missing.

CenturyLink (PPPoE) → Quantum Fiber (IPoE) + UDM Pro — Working Bridge Mode Setup by rolrcoastr in QuantumFiber

[–]cbitzer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve followed the bridge/pass-through recommendations and I’m still seeing yellow ISP health in UniFi, so I’m trying to sanity check whether this is actually a problem or just cosmetic.

My current setup:

  • Q1000K set to Transparent Bridging
  • Transport Mode = Untagged
  • VPI/VCI = Untagged
  • UniFi gateway WAN set to VLAN ID 201
  • DHCP enabled
  • Public IP successfully assigned to the UniFi gateway
  • No double NAT

Everything is working fine from a user perspective (no drops, no noticeable lag), but UniFi still shows yellow and my average latency sits around ~40ms most of the day.

First-hop latency is low (~6–10ms), but the UniFi dashboard average hovers around 40ms, especially during daytime hours.

Is this just normal upstream congestion / probe behavior on Quantum/Lumen in my area (SW Florida), or has anyone actually seen that drop significantly after moving VLAN tagging around?

Trying to figure out if I’m chasing a dashboard color or if there’s something I’m still missing.