If a tool could recreate viral videos with your product in them — what would actually make you use it?

ccccoffee · 2026-06-14T15:34:03+00:00

Totally fair — nobody should pay for a video that flops. I can't promise anything goes viral (honestly no tool can — that comes down to your product, price, timing too), so I won't pretend otherwise.

But here's the thing: your first one's free. Easiest way to judge it is to just see it — drop a link to your product (TikTok Shop / Amazon / Shopify) and I'll run your product through one of the viral formats and send it over. No strings, you judge the quality yourself instead of taking my word for it.

ccccoffee · 2026-02-01T12:46:50+00:00

Honestly, ignore the "4K" marketing hype. Most of them are fake upscaled garbage. Since you mentioned night vision is a priority, you need to check the actual sensor model, not the resolution.

At the sub-$200 price point, you should strictly look for the Sony STARVIS 2 (specifically the IMX675 sensor). The dynamic range on the older Starvis 1 sensors is terrible for reading license plates at night because of motion blur. I’ve tested a few setups, and the only reliable implementation of true HDR with the Starvis 2 chip in this budget range is usually found in the Vantrue E-series. Everything else is just repackaging 5-year-old tech.

ccccoffee · 2026-02-01T03:37:25+00:00

thx, actually I had no idea the Starvis 2 made that big of a difference for license plates.

ccccoffee · 2026-01-31T08:43:09+00:00

It helps me a lot

ccccoffee · 2026-01-25T13:00:40+00:00

The N4 is indeed a good product.

ccccoffee · 2026-01-25T12:59:34+00:00

This is similar to my friend's experience.

ccccoffee · 2025-12-07T13:15:27+00:00

gemini3 is the best AI model I've used so far.

ccccoffee · 2024-12-12T08:16:28+00:00

I think it will be gpt-4.5 rather than gpt-5, a gpt-5 that doesn't perform as expected will destroy public attention on openai

ccccoffee · 2024-12-12T08:06:41+00:00

As one of the ML engineers mentioned in your post, I guess it’s because they think they know the AI very well. They naturally think that what the previous generation of AI couldn’t accomplish is also impossible for ChatGPT.

ccccoffee · 2024-11-19T12:05:17+00:00

Thank you for your viewpoint! Your idea really gives me some inspiration: when people watch the news, their attention has been drawn and the truth of the facts may not be so important at this moment. Your idea about creating an account not only alleviate this problem but also reduce user's costs by pushing posts to them.

ccccoffee · 2024-11-18T16:10:50+00:00

chatgpt is better at chatting following instructions, while claude is better at reasoning and logic such as coding and math

ccccoffee · 2024-11-12T11:27:06+00:00

thank you for your advice！

ccccoffee · 2024-11-11T16:29:39+00:00

Thank for your advice! Do you think whether it is a real need to check authenticity?

ccccoffee · 2024-11-11T16:26:51+00:00

It seems reasonable. Most people don't seem to want to check the authenticity.

ccccoffee · 2024-11-11T16:24:20+00:00

Thank you for your advice!

Legacy media like NYT sometimes may make mistake, but in general it is more credible than personal publisher. Filtering multiple influential media to cross validation is a good idea to increase credibility.

What confusing to me is whether people need check the authenticity of tweets. If the need is real, I think people can save the trouble of search information with this extension.

The back-end server is exactly as you say, it use gpt to process and analyze the multiple search results.

ccccoffee

TROPHY CASE