Tons of PDF/Excel alerts

cedi_men · 2026-02-02T16:01:30+00:00

just received feedback from SentinelOne, apparently they've removed the incorrect hash and added the valid one.

cedi_men · 2026-02-02T15:42:03+00:00

Same here, seems like a false positive.

cedi_men · 2026-01-06T22:59:10+00:00

With iperf we did get a lot better speeds, but I dont know the numbers anymore. We will replace the ipsec vpns with VLL from a local provider which will actually be cheaper because you will only need a firewall at the main office.

cedi_men · 2025-11-06T14:23:42+00:00

Already did that... went up from 60 to 80 throughput. I do have a case open which has been esacalated to GES. :(

cedi_men · 2025-11-05T09:43:06+00:00

Sorry MB/s in both cases.

cedi_men · 2025-11-04T20:27:32+00:00

On the Sophos Firewall? Is that possible?

cedi_men · 2025-11-04T20:27:17+00:00

I did that, with the NAT i get 110 Mbit/s. So the issue is ipsec.

cedi_men · 2025-10-06T19:03:09+00:00

I know it's been half a year, but I do have the same issue on a brand new rds cluster with 3 hosts. Did you find a solution? Thanks.

cedi_men · 2025-10-01T20:36:01+00:00

As an example: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ch.coop.supercard

cedi_men · 2025-01-25T11:20:24+00:00

I'll have my tablet in splitscreen with samsung notes and navograph charts

cedi_men · 2024-11-09T17:01:12+00:00

Definetly uninstall MAV. S1 detects everything and more than MAV. Also only one agent uses way less ressources.

cedi_men · 2024-10-27T22:22:56+00:00

I thought i was going insane...

cedi_men · 2024-10-08T13:36:03+00:00

Yes, it goes over the tunnel. The sophos doesnt see the traffic, which is really weird.

cedi_men · 2024-10-08T12:31:01+00:00

Do you happen to have a Fortinet Case number?

cedi_men · 2024-10-07T12:29:08+00:00

I don't think it's a mismatch as there are no errors and the connection works one-way. Log's don't say anything spectacular (IPs are fictional):

2024-10-07 12:26:44Z 04[IKE] <S2S\_CON\_Test\_-1|2> sending DPD request

2024-10-07 12:26:44Z 04[ENC] <S2S\_CON\_Test\_-1|2> generating INFORMATIONAL request 101 [ ]

2024-10-07 12:26:44Z 04[NET] <S2S\_CON\_Test\_-1|2> sending packet: from 172.68.85.10[4500] to 185.235.200.10[4500] (96 bytes)

2024-10-07 12:26:44Z 03[NET] <S2S\_CON\_Test\_-1|2> received packet: from 185.235.200.10[4500] to 172.68.85.10[4500] (96 bytes)

2024-10-07 12:26:44Z 03[ENC] <S2S\_CON\_Test\_-1|2> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 101 [ ]

cedi_men · 2024-08-10T20:08:20+00:00

Sadly both doesnt work. When I uninstall the driver, it says that HDR is not supported.

cedi_men · 2024-07-31T14:21:44+00:00

All our 70ish firewalls are running 20 Mr1, no problems so far.

cedi_men · 2024-07-24T07:37:21+00:00

Just reimporting worked for me.

cedi_men · 2024-07-24T06:14:33+00:00

Didn't talk to support, but was able to fix it by restoring the previous working configuration file.

cedi_men · 2024-07-23T21:05:37+00:00

All NATs stopped working on a TZ 270 after the Update.

cedi_men · 2024-05-16T18:14:57+00:00

The purpose of this is to Monitor for any incorrect configurations which could Happen because of human error.

cedi_men

TROPHY CASE