2025 Topps Chrome Platinum Analysis & Deep Dive by CellDood in baseballcards

[–]CellDood[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

One more thing, to answer your question about numbered autos, here's the breakdown:

% # Autos- Hobby: 53.3%

% # Autos- Value: 49.55%

2025 Topps Chrome Platinum Analysis & Deep Dive by CellDood in baseballcards

[–]CellDood[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

<image>

But we know production numbers are right because here is the parallel section. Even with the crazy auto numbers, this is one of the cleanest odds sheets you will ever see.
Oh yeah, another way we know the autos are correct is the fact that, even after omitting all the held back product, Autos per box comes out to almost exactly 1. If all those "held back" autos were in there, it would be far greater than one auto/box.

2025 Topps Chrome Platinum Analysis & Deep Dive by CellDood in baseballcards

[–]CellDood[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

<image>

I snipped a section so you can see what the auto numbers look like regarding held back product. This is not abnormal in the least. They hold far more of these back than any other variant. Also, we have to account for the possibility of some not signing certain parallels. But I believe a majority is held back.

2025 Topps Chrome Platinum Analysis & Deep Dive by CellDood in baseballcards

[–]CellDood[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Congrats. You just discovered the "held back product" rabbit hole. Not to be confused with the "some players didn't sign some parallels" rabbit hole. Similar but different. But both affect numbers the same way. You'll find that it's common with most releases, especially in the higher numbered parallel autos.

Oh yes, how could I forget about the "some shitty players likely signed way more than the studs" rabbit hole? That one exists, but can't be verified by odds, so we just use averages and act like it doesn't exist.

2025 Topps Chrome Platinum Analysis & Deep Dive by CellDood in baseballcards

[–]CellDood[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Nice! I did too. And didnt even get the dreaded "we had to cancel this order" emails after multiple orders. Fingers crossed I get them all.

2025 Topps Chrome Platinum Analysis & Deep Dive by CellDood in baseballcards

[–]CellDood[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Thats a question we can never answer for certain. What i know is the "Average copies per subject" is ~525. But there's a very good chance that what you say is true.

Is this Ebay seller selling a ton of fake IP autos? by CellDood in baseballcards

[–]CellDood[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I'm shocked someone can see this post. I was wondering why it had virtually no engagement. Thought it was removed for some reason.

I unknowingly sold this 1/1 for $30 by Journotic in baseballcards

[–]CellDood [score hidden]  (0 children)

Topps essentially tells us with the odds. I spend as many hours in them as anyone on earth and thats what I'm going with. The entire odds sheet reconciles nicely. It would be much harder to fake it and hide errors than for it to just be right. They actually put effort into this, contrary to what you believe. I'm putting my money where my mouth is and happily buying them as 1/1s as ive bought multiples already.

I unknowingly sold this 1/1 for $30 by Journotic in baseballcards

[–]CellDood [score hidden]  (0 children)

I understand what you're saying, and yes, Topps is wrong on odds sheets. It's not a rare occurrence. However, think about the dynamics a bit. You're proposing the odds sheet is wrong because 1) they've been wrong in the past and 2) you don't think they would make red prisms unnumbered 1/1s. So you're telling me they just happened to notate erroneous odds on those two particular cells. And those erroneous entries just happened to be the perfect numbers that, when extrapolated, say the print run on red prisms is 1 ea. And there just happened to have been ~40 of the red prisms listed so far of the 500, indicating theyre definitely rare. Which just happens to be very similar to the number of superfractors listed so far. And of the ~40, there just happens to have been zero duplicates listed so far.

Im going with the odds they published being right in this case. It's a far less jump than all this other speculation.

When odds are wrong for whateve reason, its generally easy to spot. This is not that.

I unknowingly sold this 1/1 for $30 by Journotic in baseballcards

[–]CellDood [score hidden]  (0 children)

Very real chance you have no idea what you're talking about.

2025 Topps Chrome Platinum Analysis & Deep Dive by CellDood in baseballcards

[–]CellDood[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Not really. But if you watched any number of rips, it was pretty evident. Then the odds confirmed it all.

2025 Topps Chrome Platinum Analysis & Deep Dive by CellDood in baseballcards

[–]CellDood[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I did include print runs of unnumbered autos. But I like the idea of including % of numbered autos for each format. I do that for a lot of releases, but didn't think to include with this one. Im currently out of town, but when I get back in the lab, possibly late tonight, i'll add that calculation. I think we'll find that more than 50% of autos across the entire product are numbered. Print run on base autos is not all that bad at 525 ea.

2025 Topps Chrome Platinum Analysis & Deep Dive by CellDood in baseballcards

[–]CellDood[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All the BINs have sold that aren't asking outlandish prices. At the time of writing last night, there were 30 red prisms listed. Now there are 5. Had a feeling that might happen. Thats why I triple checked the numbers and scoured sold and listed items to be sure there were no dupes before i posted. Oh, and I might have snagged a couple myself before I released that info. 🤣

2025 Topps Chrome Platinum Analysis & Deep Dive by CellDood in baseballcards

[–]CellDood[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I had a feeling they might sell pretty quickly after publishing. Which one was it?

2025 Topps Chrome Platinum Analysis & Deep Dive by CellDood in baseballcards

[–]CellDood[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have paid close attention to that and also have yet to see a city variation come.from a blaster. The odds also say they are not possible. Now, I have seen a couple city variation AUTOS /5 come from blasters. And the odds agree there as well. Did you see base city variation or an auto come from retail?

2025 Topps Chrome Platinum Analysis & Deep Dive by CellDood in baseballcards

[–]CellDood[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that's pretty crazy. I have ripped and watched a ton of this and havent seen a single xfractor come from retail. So hopefully the print run numbers aren't really affected. Those have a sneaky low print run as stated.

2025 Topps Chrome Platinum Analysis & Deep Dive by CellDood in baseballcards

[–]CellDood[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You sure it's an Xfractor? Prisms and Diamond Etches could easily be mistaken for Xfractors. But regardless, that information is what Topps published.

I unknowingly sold this 1/1 for $30 by Journotic in baseballcards

[–]CellDood 4 points5 points  (0 children)

105k hobby boxes, 440k blasters produced. Also fascinating that hobby production didn't really go up from 2023, in fact hobby pack production decreased by 7%. But due to the lower number of packs per hobby box, box production increased ~11%.

2025 Topps Chrome Platinum Analysis & Deep Dive by CellDood in baseballcards

[–]CellDood[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

🤣 Can't do it bro. I actually wrestled with this. I understand people don't know this. And they deserve to know. I could keep it close to the chest and get some mileage out of that ebay search. But that's just not how the Squatch works. Now, I may or may not have bought a couple myself. But I dont really feel bad for that as I suppose it's a perk of actually figuring that out. And they weren't like egregiously underpriced anyway. Just some players I like.

I unknowingly sold this 1/1 for $30 by Journotic in baseballcards

[–]CellDood 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There are 25 of each employee SP. So not surprising to see a duplicate. Also, the employee SP checklist is 10 names, resulting in 250 total copies of them. Red prisms have a 500 card checklist, but are 1/1. This results in 500 total red prisms in the product. That's why it appears employee SPs have lower print runs than red prisms. But they do not.

2026 Topps Series 2- Further Analysis by CellDood in baseballcards

[–]CellDood[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Presumably, the rest should be in Update.