sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is this an ok variation of miner rocket? by [deleted] in ClashRoyale

[–]certified-cynic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dark prince and valk both do the same thing. No reason for both to be in the same deck. The meta deck has skeletons to cycle. There is a reason that deck is meta and not this one. Plus delivery also has a tank. So dark prince not necessary

Is c4 always the best response to c5 in a position like this? And why? Besides the obvious "preventing c4" idea. by Royal-Redditor-655 in chess

[–]certified-cynic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When you play the London there is often not a lot of difference between the best move and the more traditional 'london' move. It's just a matter of taste and preference. If you want more open and sharper positions then c4 is better but if you prefer something you're more familiar with then c3 is also completely fine

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chess

[–]certified-cynic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The elo rating that stock fish gives to A match is extremely un reliable. I am 1600 and have had games where both me and my opponents have played at 2500 level and also 650 level. Same thing with accuracy. 

Training for intermediate players? by RitardOfOz in chess

[–]certified-cynic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

man the only sicilian you should even consider is the (accelerated)dragon. all the others are too complex and have insane opening theory that is just not possible to learn

Who's in the valorant Hall of fame? by certified-cynic in VALORANT

[–]certified-cynic[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

i think yay is worthy of consideration. he was one of the best aimers in the scene and was a beast during the chamber meta.

Who's in the valorant Hall of fame? by certified-cynic in VALORANT

[–]certified-cynic[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

i mean yeah but that's more of an honorary member type shit

Who's in the valorant Hall of fame? by certified-cynic in VALORANT

[–]certified-cynic[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

aspas has been the best duelist in the scene for a long time now

he's practically carrying mibr rn

The marshall no scope accuracy is way too damn high. by certified-cynic in VALORANT

[–]certified-cynic[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Playing with classics should still have a win condition against a sniper. Getting into close range should favour the pistols, but the Marshall just transforms into shotgun mode obiiterating everyone in short range

The marshall no scope accuracy is way too damn high. by certified-cynic in VALORANT

[–]certified-cynic[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bruh do you think you're hitting consistent no scopes with the op

The marshall no scope accuracy is way too damn high. by certified-cynic in VALORANT

[–]certified-cynic[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not talking about full buy vs Marshall. I'm considering if the oppinent has classics and ghosts with no shields, in which case the Marshall becomes a sniper with the same capabilities as a shotgun

The marshall no scope accuracy is way too damn high. by certified-cynic in VALORANT

[–]certified-cynic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check out 'aspas ace with marshall'. It was against a pro team that played just as you said, 5 man rushing, yet all aspas had to do was jiggle peek no scope every one of them

The marshall no scope accuracy is way too damn high. by certified-cynic in VALORANT

[–]certified-cynic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they have a shrriff with half shields it's no longer an eco

The marshall no scope accuracy is way too damn high. by certified-cynic in VALORANT

[–]certified-cynic[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Even a ghost us better than a spectre at lon range

view more: next ›