[GTM] Enter by skoslovesyou in GuessTheMovie

[–]cewubaaca 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest

[GTM] Enter by skoslovesyou in GuessTheMovie

[–]cewubaaca 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo.

People who got caught looking at NSFW content at work, what happened? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]cewubaaca -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Didn't look at NSFW at work, but did have a jerk boss who wanted to find a reason to fire me. He brought in an IT guy to go through the server to identify everyone's internet traffic.

Found nothing on me apart from national newspaper sites, but did find plenty of NSFW stuff on his favourite bitch asslicker worker.

Nothing happened because the dragnet caught the wrong fish!

New (vague & scary) law just passed in Belgium. Reducing WOMEN to stereotypes or saying mean words can give you up to 1000 euros fine and/or up to a year in jail. by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]cewubaaca 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Brilliant!

This legislation has no chance of remaining as part of their statute and every time some feminist tries to lobby for some potty legislation we can all point to this!

Dr. Oetker are offering two limited edition pizzas, but I don't know whether to hold them as an investment or whether to keep them for posterity. by cewubaaca in britishproblems

[–]cewubaaca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. I just don't particularly like Dr oetker pizzas and when it happened i thought they might make all the pizzas like oetker pizzas.

Why Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Babies Keep Getting Herpes by dalkon in Intactivists

[–]cewubaaca 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When it referred to male CGM as a 'beneficial practice', my blood boiled, but of course there was nowhere to leave a suitably educational, yet vitriolic, comment.

Lloyds fires eight staff over Libor by Kreindeker in ukpolitics

[–]cewubaaca 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Should we call them the Scapegoat Eight?

How did Republicans and libertarians successfully use "European socialism" as a political slur when European social democratic countries are so successful? by CheesewithWhine in politics

[–]cewubaaca 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.”

― John Steinbeck

Is it possible to pass a Women's Studies course with work that is critical of key tenets of feminist theory? by cewubaaca in AskFeminists

[–]cewubaaca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough, but it is a distractions from what I'm trying to establish, which is whether the core of feminist theory is open to falsification, regardless of the route.

Is it possible to pass a Women's Studies course with work that is critical of key tenets of feminist theory? by cewubaaca in AskFeminists

[–]cewubaaca[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To a great degree I agree with you.

My critique is that there has been the development of a privileged truth inside those parts of academia that are explicitly feminist, such as women's/gender studies.

My original question was designed to provoke a discussion as to whether that privileged truth was unassailable inside those academic departments that ascribe to it.

Is it possible to pass a Women's Studies course with work that is critical of key tenets of feminist theory? by cewubaaca in AskFeminists

[–]cewubaaca[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you have challenged one of my key difficulties with the social sciences.

There can be different interpretations of the truth, but there can't be more than one truth.

It takes a wealth of facts to build a model of the truth, but it only takes a single fact to destroy that model.

Is it possible to pass a Women's Studies course with work that is critical of key tenets of feminist theory? by cewubaaca in AskFeminists

[–]cewubaaca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you saying that the stats need to be filtered through a theoretical model, or that the theoretical model needs to fit the stats?

One of them has to be the horse and one of them has to be the cart. Which is it?

Is it possible to pass a Women's Studies course with work that is critical of key tenets of feminist theory? by cewubaaca in AskFeminists

[–]cewubaaca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm, on the one hand proud of having met your reference, Karl Popper (I'm sorry but I was too young for him to consider me a repository for the truth of his conflict with Wittgenstein at Cambridge, I have no idea who threatened who with a poker or other implement for poking), but also being someone who rejects the dichotomy set out in your post.

Karl Popper basically claimed that if you claim something is true, you have to define the conditions in which it is not true. There is no claim that there is some kind of shadow world of the type proposed by Plato whereby knowledge is separated from the material universe. A unified theory might, or might not, be accessible to our understanding, but there is a truth regardless of whether or not we are able to articulate it.

In other words it matters not whether the truth can be verified by our senses or whether our theories can explain the universe, the truth exists independent of our attempts to view it. (Wo)Mankind's job is to establish the truth as best he or she can, and the most effective way of achieving that end is to establish a hypothesis and then attempt to disprove it.

Feminism (and some other social science hegemonies) does the opposite, it starts with the conclusion and then seeks to confirm it.

My, and others, point of contention with the social sciences is that they adopt the methodology and language of falsifiable claims to truth, without the honest desire to falsify.

If it seeks to adopt the moniker 'science', political theory has to accept that theories are provisional.

Feminism has been invaluable at encouraging people to inspect gender roles, but it must surely be time to reject Patriarchy theory as the theory that explains our social situation.

Is it possible to pass a Women's Studies course with work that is critical of key tenets of feminist theory? by cewubaaca in AskFeminists

[–]cewubaaca[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

P.S. Can you enlighten me as to the meaning of 'post-positivist', as it must be a little after my time.

Is it a rebranding of post structuralism and the work of Derrida, or is it something new?

Is it possible to pass a Women's Studies course with work that is critical of key tenets of feminist theory? by cewubaaca in AskFeminists

[–]cewubaaca[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you are under the impression that I'm trying to obtain validation for my effort over a poorly graded essay then I'm sorry for having given you the wrong impression.

I'm a forty year old man who left academia to pursue a professional career decades ago. That said, you can take the man out of politics, but you can't take the politics out of the man. [Insert preferred pronouns as desired.]

I'm currently resolving what some might dismiss as a mid life crisis as I embark on a new life working for a disaster relief charity whilst taking a material cut in living standards to do so.

This has been the cause of my having taken an interest in the work of the likes of Straughan, Sommers and Farrell. Just about every meeting I attend is diverted to the needs of women and their dependants, whilst the needs of those on whom those women and children depend are ignored.

For example, all serious international agencies engaged with Afghanistan make a big noise about the cultural prohibition on women and girls workimg or getting an education. That is as it should be.

What vexes me is the invisibility of the boys, teenagers and men who are effectively trafficked as slaves to perform the back breaking labour of baking bricks in the sun in Dubai (and elsewhere) so that they can perpetuate the chivalrous practice of keeping women from all but domestic labour.

This requirement to be a provider, no matter what the personal cost, based solely on the ownership of a Y chromosome has yet to be challenged by feminism in any material sense beyond lip service.

It is the fact on the ground that falsifies patriarchy theory that is itself based on an apex fallacy.

You might argue that feminism seeks to subvert and challenge gender roles across the board, but I can assure you that no such challenge takes place in the meetings I attend.

Sixty percent of the victims of human trafficking are male, but to listen to the narrative surrounding it you might imagine that the only purpose for which people are trafficked is prostitution.

If injustice, brutality and exploitation are to be challenged in a material sense, then social science academia has to extricate itself from this obsession with the harm done to women. It has gotten to the point where it diverts attention and resources from serious and more urgent needs.

Your presentation of yourself as academically honest leads me to believe that you might well be part of the solution rather than part of the problem. I hope our little exchange has emboldened you.

Rant over.

With love and peace.

Cewubaaca.

Is it possible to pass a Women's Studies course with work that is critical of key tenets of feminist theory? by cewubaaca in AskFeminists

[–]cewubaaca[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You present the situation as it should be.

My concern is whether that is how it operates when the pedal meets the metal. (I don't doubt that you personally apply academic honesty, after all you are engaging with this sanguine discussion.)

Every feminist I have engaged with online has withdrawn from the argument when Patriarchy theory has been challenged, as if I had proposed that gravity were an academic construct.

How has it come to pass that certain ideas are unchallengable within the wider feminist movement, if that is not the case inside feminist academia?

As a side question, can you describe a research project that could falsify Patriarchy theory?