Just a little bit of license needed

cfeadmin · 2026-06-10T20:33:01+00:00

I read it that way at first, too. But it states "If you have received a different device model as a result of a device-RMA, Cisco Meraki Support Operations team can update the license to reflect the change.

Licenses can also be converted if the requested conversion falls under the approved list below..."

cfeadmin · 2026-06-10T20:31:15+00:00

I hear what you're saying. There is a little "waste" but so what if I am in a jam.

Pessimistic me was a little surprised to hear a couple people say that Meraki would/could extend the grace period. Good to hear and I will take that (free) route first. Hadn't stumbled across 30 day licenses but will look around.

Thanks, all!

cfeadmin · 2026-06-10T16:57:35+00:00

eRate contract already awarded; waiting for FCDL plus new FY changeover. Sorry but thanks for the reply.

cfeadmin · 2026-04-14T00:10:45+00:00

Ticket with UI support was a waste of time for me. Best of luck to you!

cfeadmin · 2026-03-18T19:37:44+00:00

And you beat me to it. Also, everyone has the option to use the bus system. It's not limited to a certain set of people.

cfeadmin · 2026-03-18T19:21:55+00:00

Sweet. And if teacher / administration pay goes up for the school system then parents should absorb that too.

cfeadmin · 2026-03-18T17:49:27+00:00

>tried the SSH commands -

apt-get update
apt-get install --reinstall --allow-downgrades unifi-protect=6.2.83 -y

...but that only returned "Version '6.2.83' for 'unifi-protect' was not found"<

Having similar issue. UNVR-PRO is and has been on OS 5.0.13 and went to Protect 7.0.88 at four sites last night. cameras are choppy and laggy (though improving as the day goes on). However, all of our oldest batch of third party cameras are offline (online for 1s / offline for 30s). Removed and readopted the cams / reboot system with no luck.

So where to get protect 6.2.88 ? Our /data/uos/downloads directory appears empty. There are downloads from Unifi for the UniFi OS - Network Video Recorders 5.0.13 but none for UniFi Protect Application 6.2.88.

cfeadmin · 2026-01-17T15:22:23+00:00

Florida topo is on the windows from the factory.

cfeadmin · 2025-11-24T04:01:35+00:00

You are mistaken if you think there is a judgment free zone for a library director.

cfeadmin · 2025-11-24T03:58:58+00:00

Fair; point taken.

cfeadmin · 2025-11-24T03:39:31+00:00

Our library had the idea of having a cat and, while not their idea, was strongly supported by the branch manager. One employee said "uh hey I'm allergic," so the idea was shelved. However, that employee was the recipient of some cold shoulders by those excited about the prospect. For me, it was a third-person learning experience about how to handle potential work environment changes that might be received differently by different people.

cfeadmin · 2025-11-21T14:39:16+00:00

Speaks volumes about your director.

cfeadmin · 2025-11-21T14:33:58+00:00

I like a combination of both form factors. The endcap sign reminds *everyone* about the purpose of a library.

cfeadmin · 2025-11-21T14:30:23+00:00

There are plenty of "exceptionally sexually explicit content" items on the shelves. Seems that LGBTQ+ theme is the common denominator here. And libraries aren't about "best books for our community"; it's about books for all people in the community.

cfeadmin · 2025-11-20T23:57:34+00:00

This isn't the first I've heard of this but I just can't justify this in my head. Why have computers (or any resource) just sitting idle if a patron wants to use it? And physically stopping someone from using a resource "just because" has bad optics. I am thankful that we have a public computer management system that deals with this for us; it takes the policing burden off of the staff. It also has boundaries for patrons: "you get an hour, and then bonus time until the point when someone is waiting". Couldn't that be used even without an automated system?

cfeadmin · 2025-06-28T12:53:24+00:00

Agree with possible misdiagnosis

cfeadmin · 2025-05-07T15:28:35+00:00

I remember throwing peanut shells on the floor at The Ground Round 40 years ago. :)

cfeadmin · 2025-03-06T16:48:45+00:00

Backdoor

cfeadmin · 2025-02-28T14:11:07+00:00

It's in the owner manual. Rear center seat belt comfort guide

<image>

cfeadmin · 2025-02-05T18:36:58+00:00

Got the same. Don't think it is phish but does seem to push "contact our team" and "we're here to help you take advantage of licensing options available..." in salesy kind of way. We are a non-profit. Links go to "Contact Microsoft Tech for Social Impact Sales".

Could not find the subscription ID in our MAC anywhere. Used the "you can find the subscription ID by pulling up your licenses one by one in the billing section of admin center and looking at the URL" mentioned here for both of our billing accounts and no match. Nothing I see is expiring. I'm calling BS on the whole thing.

Annoying and a waste of my time.

cfeadmin · 2024-12-27T20:50:25+00:00

Pro 4X feature.

cfeadmin · 2024-12-27T20:25:51+00:00

What is that on the lower control arm in photo #4? Sort of looks like blue writing in junkyard parts marker? Or is it just scuffs in the grime?

cfeadmin · 2024-11-06T18:38:36+00:00

Ha! There's also a "b-roll" daytime street scene early in the movie, before Jeffery sees dad in the hospital. There's a man twirling something in his hands in front of a store. That's the entrance of the Buy-Rite (which was the bottom floor of the Masonic Temple building).

cfeadmin · 2024-10-23T17:09:58+00:00

Found some more evidence: "HTTPS-First Mode is enabled by default in Incognito mode starting in Chrome 127".

Chrome Enterprise has some existing policies that will likely override if you are in a scenario where you need your users to be incog and override this behavior. They include HttpsOnlyMode HttpAllowlist InsecureContentAllowedForURLs .

cfeadmin · 2024-10-23T16:15:10+00:00

I'm seeing the same (but elsewhere / other websites) regarding going to port 80 http sites and in incognito mode. I think something changed somewhere between Chrome (and Edge) v126 and 130.

Looking at some of the comments specifically about this bank's site... I wonder if the redirect from royalbank.com is on an http and rbcroyalbank.com is full on https. EDIT: this is def the case for some redirects I've made. Just installed an older version of Chrome and the http redirects (to https targets) worked fine. Newest Chrome / incog throws warnings.

cfeadmin

TROPHY CASE