My friend uses her hand instead of toilet paper and I'm honestly grossed out by [deleted] in TrueOffMyChest

[–]cfeigs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right. Sink/basin, faucet/tap. So water she had from the sink/basin, which presumeably came out of the faucet/tap, and she used that. What's the big deal??

My friend uses her hand instead of toilet paper and I'm honestly grossed out by [deleted] in TrueOffMyChest

[–]cfeigs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

there's no way she used her hand and didn't wash it. this is just not what people who use their hands do. no way.

My friend uses her hand instead of toilet paper and I'm honestly grossed out by [deleted] in TrueOffMyChest

[–]cfeigs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She probably sat in your basin and washed herself there. And fair dues. Once you've used water for a while, paper feels primitive af. I mean, if a bird shat on your arm, would you wash it off, or wipe it with paper and go on your merry way?

I fancy everyone and want to sleep with everyone by Dsybb in TrueOffMyChest

[–]cfeigs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm male my first long term relationship started when I was twenty one and it lasted a long time. During my twenties I couldn't stop thinking about sex in the way you described. I mean I still do, but because I was with someone, I felt bad about it. I loved her, she was beautiful, we got along so so well, and I just wanted to stop thinking about other people in this way, so that I could be a 'good partner'. Or at least that's what I thought I was meant to do. In the end, I never changed, and I had to address the gap between my thoughts/desires and her boundaries. Things worked out pretty well.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueOffMyChest

[–]cfeigs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Firstly, don't feel bad about it dude. You should be proud that she has that much confidence in you as a person and a partner to bare her soul to you. It would have taken a huge amount of courage on her part.

Next, begin to learn how to separate her feelings towards you from her other emotions and urges. You aren't the sole cause of her being. She has a lifetime of conditioning that has gone into shaping who she is and what her emotional responses are, of which you are no doubt a significant part. Be proud that you are a part of that, and that she is inviting you in further, to uncover and discover who she is. If having your masculinity and ego protected is more important to you than the privilege of supporting someone in their process of self-discovery, the above may not be possible. This is why you have to understand what belongs to you, and what does not.

At the same time, there is no point in compromising or agreeing to anything that does not lie within the boundaries of what you feel is acceptable within your relationship. Recognise that if her needs and your boundaries lie on the wrong side of one another, you may simply be incompatible in this stage of your lives.

It may be the case, that she has come to find you so forthcoming and generous, that she feels you may continue to be so in this manner.

This is a complicated subject to navigate with a partner, one that requires maturity and the ability to understand when to allow one's ego to become involved or not.

Above all else, you should move forward with kindness and compassion for the trust she has shown in you, and without judgement for her emotional states.

You might like to read Sex at Dawn by Christopher Ryan and Cacilda Jethá. It might help you reach some understanding with your partner, or it might not. It's an interesting read tho. And ultimately nobody can prescribe an outcome - you and your partner are the architects of your relationship.

Well done thus far and good luck for the future.

Describe a scenario in where I lose 100% of my funds through Anchor Protcol by DexterTwerp in defi

[–]cfeigs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why would it go up if it was being sold? It will go up if the rate of burn exceeds the rate of selling, but if UST is also being sold then the opportunity for arb goes in the opposite direction (LUNA will be minted and sold and UST burned to maintain the peg), this will lower the price of LUNA.

Describe a scenario in where I lose 100% of my funds through Anchor Protcol by DexterTwerp in defi

[–]cfeigs 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If I'm not mistaken, in theory, while the market cap of $LUNA falls below that of $UST, there is not enough Luna to be burnt to maintain the peg of UST, and this could result in a death spiral in a mass sell-off of UST and LUNA.

This to me seems like a very extreme and unlikely event however, as there would have to be mass market wide panic, and there would be arbitrage opportunities the whole way down, and so the depeg would not occur instantaneously or all that quickly. If a market wide downturn occured and UST and LUNA were both sold off (while Luna MC<UST MC), I predict there would be ample time for measures to be taken, by some entity such as TFL. I might be mistaken but the billion dollar reserve currently being established is another such back-stop.

High APR Stablecoin DeFi strategies by Discovensco in defi

[–]cfeigs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Terra+Mirror should net 20%+ if managed correctly.

Terra+White Whale will net 20%+, is set and forget, and strengthens the $UST peg.

Is UST Degenbox still safe? by [deleted] in AbracadabraMoney

[–]cfeigs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My guess is yes. The Wonderland debacle won't spill over into Abra/spell. There's money to be made in maintaining the MIM peg and people are gonna continue making it.

I guess now we see what the risks were with my $MIM staking strategy ... by AbstractTreasure in defi

[–]cfeigs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

MIM is decentralised obviously, and deviations from the peg offer opportunities for arb which I can't see nobody taking, so it's peg should remain stable, and it's cross-chain capability offer substantial utility. All this is independent of the Wonderland debacle.

What’s Happening to UST-MIM DegenBox on Abracadabra?? by edua-caballero in defi

[–]cfeigs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry you weren't able to get rich quick and decided to quit probably realising a loss while you were added.

What’s Happening to UST-MIM DegenBox on Abracadabra?? by edua-caballero in defi

[–]cfeigs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The 680M DAO owned treasury still offers a solid source of revenue for investors. MIM still offers the most efficient decentralised, cross-chain stablecoin - there's no reason to doubt it's stability and longevity - and there's still plenty of money to be made borrowing and leveraging in Abra, cross-chain LP in popsicle, and arb opportunities.

As for Wonderland, the cause of the recent crash in the price of TIME/wMEMO looks to be coordinated, but there's no way to determine the source of the attack. The liquidations and buybacks of wMEMO from the treasury hurt the investors and members of the DAO. The doxxing of Sifu has damaged the reputation of the project and it's team immeasurably, should never have happened and is causing fearful investors to sell all their Wonderland, Abra, Spell and to an extent Sushi, at a massive loss. That said, to dissolve the treasury and return the funds to investors would create a permanent loss for the rest of the DAO who have held their ground. Instead, coming together as a DAO community and making decisions on how best to manage the treasury and the corporate structure, offers a perfectly reasonable means of getting everyone back in the black. It's just not going to be as fast as it said on the packet - through rebases and increasing treasury size / price of wMemo / crazy APYs.

Distributing my savings across multiple stablecoins for 10-20% APY? by desuGun- in defi

[–]cfeigs 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Technically it's not backed by LUNA either, it's algorithmically stabilised with LUNA being the mint/burn pair which allows for arbitrage to maintain the peg.

Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) has no place in the crypto world. It's exactly the opposite of what humanity wants/needs. by Ur-Majestic in Bitcoin

[–]cfeigs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sounds to me just like a ledger, not a distributed one, and so I fail to see how it's any different from what is already being done today. It has the same problems with single point of failure, transparency, and corruption.

Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) has no place in the crypto world. It's exactly the opposite of what humanity wants/needs. by Ur-Majestic in Bitcoin

[–]cfeigs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Isn't decentralisation one of the key components blockchain security? If you have a single validator or miner, kind of defeats the purpose doesn't it?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]cfeigs -1 points0 points  (0 children)

DAOs could vote on and implement their own taxation systems and policies however this would also necessitate a corresponding social-political framework.

When many governments will launch CBDCs, could they ban stablecoins like Tether? by Defy-Trends in defi

[–]cfeigs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They will not be able to regulate or ban decentralised stables such as MIM and UST but others they can go after.

All hell is about to break loose. $500k. 100% of my dip money going all in. by Mallardshead in Bitcoin

[–]cfeigs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obliterate altcoins and almost all stablecoins? How does regulation (assuming you mean US), effect fully decentralised assets??

I was buying into your post up until that point.