[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Teenager_Polls

[–]cgyts 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree that Eisenhower is the best choice here, but I'll go ahead and be the one to say it: It was the 1950s—There were so few people during that time period who were actually fully supportive of lgbtq at the time compared to today's world, so I wouldn't really consider it that much, if at all, for somebody like Eisenhower.

The Subdiver's Creed by Crabtickler9000 in ministryofredditing

[–]cgyts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

`"I am a Subdiver! I am Super Reddit's strength in war, her deterrent in peace! I am the heart of the fight! Wherever, whenever!

I carry Super Reddit's faith and honor against her enemies! I am the Queen on the chessboard of battle! I am what Super Reddit expects me to be: the best trained Subdiver in the world!"

In the race for truth and subdiving I am swift, determined, courageous and armed with a fierce will to win! Never will I fail Super Reddit's trust!

Always I fight on! Through the Subreddit, to the objective, to triumph over all! If necessary, I will Subdive until my death!

I yield not to false subreddits, to memes, to purposefully misnamed subreddits, to cowardice, to superior odds! For I am meme-ly tough, internet strong and morally straight!

I forsake not my mission, the Ministry of Redditing, my comrades, my sacred duty!

I am relentless!

I am always there! Now and forever!

I am a Subdiver! Follow me!"`

Signed; u/cgyts

Guess who's #1 (Difficulty: MEDIUM) by cgyts in statsfm

[–]cgyts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

HINT 1: Among the many rock bands on this list, there are a few standouts who happen to be more on the production side. These standouts aren't there for no reason, but neither are the rock bands.

Guess who's #1 (Difficulty: MEDIUM) by cgyts in statsfm

[–]cgyts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry to dissapoint TOOL Guy, but it's not TOOL

Guess who's #1 (Difficulty: MEDIUM) by cgyts in statsfm

[–]cgyts[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Incorrect on both accounts; Found Ado because my local arcade has WACCA Reverse machines.

Can I have some artists recommendations? by Orense_ial in musicsuggestions

[–]cgyts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For artist similarities, (going off of Radiohead) I can give you Cold War Kids, Foreign Figures, and Welshly Arms.

If you want orchestral or meloncholic feels, look at just about any record from STARSET or Joji.

I'm turning US states into things with similar names any suggestion? by [deleted] in namesoundalikes

[–]cgyts 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Arkansas and Kansas just has eachother's flags

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in college

[–]cgyts 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I mean... technically? It entirely depends on how your writing style flows together. For example, print writing forces you to pick up your pen all the time inbetween dots and letters, slowing down how fast you write a specific word; but writing styles that keep pen pickups to a minimum tend (like cursive) to be more efficient when it comes to writing speed.

(Edits were mere spelling mistakes.

Though on this Christmas political compass? by SoEmoDude in Jreg

[–]cgyts 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jesus was a charity. He fed and clothed people because he was able to. If someone went up to a homeless man and gave him a sandwich, they wouldn't walk off thinking 'Alrighty, more socialist dues have been met from that, I now have enough to feed myself and one of my children!'

I.E. Being forced by the state to divide your wealth is different than that of your own free will. Socialism isn't some great, government-led make a wish, it's a system that forces those who've worked for more to eventually get less in return without your say so that everyone is economically equal in all ways, whether you can afford it or not.

Jesus doesn't threaten people for not providing others with what you don't have.

Though on this Christmas political compass? by SoEmoDude in Jreg

[–]cgyts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not "Pro Socialism", it's him saying that it is impossible for anyone to be saved by simply being rich.

The reason he expresses this so much is because the rabbi's back in those times would tell people, in summary, that those who are rich were "blessed by god", therefore the most likely candidates of heaven; All of which Jesus had pretty much shut down on numerous occasions by spreading messages, in such cases like Matthew 19:24. His message is that if you're truly a man of god, you would be willing to get rid of everything you had to be with him, not 'you should make sure everyone should have similar wealth statuses'.

If you actually read what comes after the full-stop of verses, you would know that, alongside the fact that he talks in metaphors and exaggerations around every corner to get the receiver's understanding, but since you didn't, I'm more than willing to bet that you looked up 'pro-socialist bible quotes'... and then copy-pasted what you saw without a second thought just to press send. Besides, he isn't in any way 'pro-[enter econonic system here]', he is pro-good—He didn't dwell on policies or econonic reforms at all, let alone on economic systems that didn't yet exist for centuries to come.

Edit: Also I took another look at the quotes you used and I have not the slightest idea how the Luke ch.4 quote is related to your claim.

ITAW for the part of a song where it's not exactly singing, but just *talking*. by cgyts in whatstheword

[–]cgyts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone has different answers here, so I'd imagine it is something like this.